Method and Psychological Effects on Learning Behaviors and Knowledge Creation in Quality Improvement Projects

References

• Adler P. S., Goldoftas B., Levine D. I. Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(1):43–68Link, Google Scholar
• Algina J., Moulder B. C. A note on estimating the Jöreskog-Yang model for latent variable interaction using LISREL 8.3. Structural Equation Modeling (2001) 8(1):40–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile T. M.Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity (1996) (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) Google Scholar
• Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. F. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37(4):634–665Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson J. C., Gerbing D. W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psych. Bull. (1988) 103(3):411–423Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson J. C., Rungtusanatham M., Schroeder R. G. A theory of quality management underlying the Deming management method. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19(3):472–509Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyris C. Double loop learning in organizations. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1977) 55(5):115–124Google Scholar
• Bagozzi R. P., Yi Y. Multitrait-multimethod matrices in consumer research. J. Consumer Res. (1991) 17(4):426–439Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney M. Motorola’s second generation. Six Sigma Forum Magazine (2002) 1(3):13–16Google Scholar
• Benner M. J., Tushman M. L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28(2):238–256Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boiral O. ISO 9000: Outside the iron cage. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(6):720–737Link, Google Scholar
• Boomsma A., Hoogland J. J., Cudeck R., du Toit S., Sörbom D. The robustness of LISREL modeling revisited. Structural Equation Models: Present and Future (2001) (Scientific Software International, Chicago, IL) 139–168Google Scholar
• Breyfogle F. W.Implementing Six Sigma: Smarter Solutions Using Statistical Methods (1999) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Davenport T. H., Prusak L.Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Deming W. E.Out of the Crisis (1986) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• du Toit M., du Toit S.Interactive LISREL: User’s Guide (2001) (Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, IL) Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(2):350–383Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. C., Winslow A. B., Bohmer R. M. J., Pisano G. P. Learning how and learning what: Effects of tacit and codified knowledge on performance improvement following technology adoption. Decision Sci. (2003) 34(2):197–223Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K., Santos F., Pettigrew A., Thomas H., Whittington R. Knowledge-based view: A new theory of strategy? Handbook of Strategy and Management (2002) (Sage, London, UK) 139–164Google Scholar
• Ericsson K. A., Hastie R., Sternberg R. J. Contemporary approaches to the study of thinking and problem solving. Thinking and Problem Solving (1994) (Academic Press, San Diego, CA) 37–79Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fedor D. B., Ghosh S., Caldwell S. D., Maurer T. J., Singhal V. R. The effects of knowledge management on team members’ ratings of project success and impact. Decision Sci. (2003) 34(3):513–539Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S. Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(6):611–629Link, Google Scholar
• Fine C. H. Quality improvement and learning in productive systems. Management Sci. (1986) 32(10):1301–1315Link, Google Scholar
• Fiol C. M., Lyles M. A. Organizational learning. Acad. Management Rev. (1985) 10(4):803–813Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedlander F., Srivastva S. Patterns of individual and organizational learning. The Executive Mind: New Insights on Managerial Thought and Action (1983) (Jossey-Bass, San Franscisco, CA) 192–220Google Scholar
• Garvin D. A. Building a learning organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1993) 71(4):78–91Google Scholar
• Grant R. M. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. (1996a) 7(4):375–387Link, Google Scholar
• Grant R. M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996b) 17(Winter Special Issue):109–122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Wageman R. Total quality management: Empirical, conceptual, and practical issues. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(2):309–342Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harry M. J., Schroeder R.Six Sigma: The Breakthrough Management Strategy Revolutionizing the World’s Top Corporations (2000) (Doubleday, New York) Google Scholar
• Hu L.-T., Bentler P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling (1999) 6(1):1–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber G. P. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):88–115Link, Google Scholar
• Ittner C. D., Larcker D. F. The performance effects of process management techniques. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):522–534Link, Google Scholar
• Ittner C. D., Nagar V., Rajan M. V. An empirical examination of dynamic quality-based learning models. Management Sci. (2001) 47(4):563–578Link, Google Scholar
• Jackson S., Dutton J. Discerning threats and opportunities. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1988) 33:370–387Crossref, Google Scholar
• James L. R., Demaree R. G., Wolf G. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. (1984) 69(1):85–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• James W.The Principles of Psychology (1950) (Dover Publications, New York) . orig. pub. 1890Google Scholar
• Jöreskog K. G., Sörbom D.LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide (1996) (Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, IL) Google Scholar
• Kenny D. A., Judd C. M. Estimating the nonlinear and interactive effects of latent variables. Psych. Bull. (1984) 96:201–210Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397Link, Google Scholar
• Lapré M. A., Van Wassenhove L. N. Creating and transferring knowledge for productivity improvement in factories. Management Sci. (2001) 47(10):1311–1325Link, Google Scholar
• Lapré M. A., Mukherjee A. S., Van Wassenhove L. N. Behind the learning curve: Linking learning activities to waste reduction. Management Sci. (2000) 46(5):597–611Link, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D.Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation (1995) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Levin D. Z. Organizational learning and the transfer of knowledge: An investigation of quality improvement. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(6):630–647Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A., March J. G. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(Special Issue):95–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B., March J. G. Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1988) 14:319–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li G., Rajagopalan S. The impact of quality on learning. J. Oper. Management (1997) 15(3):181–191Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim K. K., Ahmed P. K., Zairi M. Managing for quality through knowledge management. Total Quality Management (1999) 10(4/5):S615–S621Google Scholar
• MacDuffie J. P. The road to “root cause:” Shop-floor problem-solving at three auto assembly plants. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):479–502Link, Google Scholar
• March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87Link, Google Scholar
• March J. G., Simon H. A.Organizations (1958) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Mardia K. V. Measure of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika (1970) 57:519–530Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., Schoorman F. D. An integration model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(3):709–734Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath R. G. Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(1):118–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Misztal B. A.Trust in Modern Societies (1996) (Polity Press, Cambridge, England, UK) Google Scholar
• Mukherjee A. S., Lapré M. A., Van Wassenhove L. N. Knowledge driven quality improvement. Management Sci. (1998) 44(11, 2):S35–S49Link, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Newell A., Shaw J. C., Simon H. A. Elements of a theory of human problem solving. Psych. Rev. (1958) 65(3):151–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson J. A., Zenger T. R. A knowledge-based theory of the firm–the problem-solving perspective. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(6):617–632Link, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(1):14–37Link, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I., Takeuchi H.The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation (1995) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunnally J. C.Psychometric Theory (1978) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Pande P. S., Neuman R. P., Cavanagh R. R.The Six Sigma Way: How GE, Motorola, and Other Top Companies Are Honing Their Performance (2000) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Pisano G. P. Knowledge, integration, and the locus of learning: An empirical analysis of process development. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15(Special Issue):85–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polanyi M.The Tacit Dimension (1966) (Doubleday, New York) Google Scholar
• Powell T. C. Total quality management as competitive advantage: A review and empirical study. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16(1):15–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ring P. S., Van de Ven A. H. Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13(7):483–498Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson J. P., Shaver P. R., Wrightsman L. S. Criteria for scale selection and evaluation. Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes (1991) (Academic Press, San Diego, CA) 1–16Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth A. V., Jackson W. E. Strategic determinants of service quality and performance: Evidence from the banking industry. Management Sci. (1995) 41(11):1720–1733Link, Google Scholar
• Ryan K. D., Oestreich D. K.Driving Fear Out of the Workplace: Creating the High-Trust, High-Performance Organization (1998) 2nd ed.(Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Sackmann S. A. Culture and subcultures: An analysis of organizational knowledge. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37(1):140–161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samson D., Terziovski M. The relationship between total quality management practices and operational performance. J. Oper. Management (1999) 17(4):393–409Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanders D., Hild C. A discussion of strategies for Six Sigma implementation. Quality Engrg. (2000) 12(3):303–309Crossref, Google Scholar
• Satorra A., Bentler P. M., von Eye A., Clogg C. C. Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. Latent Variables Analysis: Applications for Developmental Research (1994) (American Statistical Association, Alexandria, VA) 399–419Google Scholar
• Schulz M. Limits to bureaucratic growth: The density dependence of organizational rule births. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43(4):845–876Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumacker R. E. Latent variable interaction modeling. Structural Equation Modeling (2002) 9(1):40–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Senge P. It’s the learning: The real lesson of the quality movement. J. Quality Participation (1999) 22(6):34–40Google Scholar
• Shewhart W. A.Statistical Method from the Viewpoint of Quality Control (1939) (The Graduate School the Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
• Sitkin S. B., Sutcliffe K. M., Schroeder R. G. Distinguishing control from learning in total quality management: A contingency perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19(3):537–564Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snee R. D. Impact of Six Sigma on quality engineering. Quality Engrg. (2000) 12(3):ix–xivCrossref, Google Scholar
• Spender J. C. Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter Special Issue):45–62Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vera D., Crossan M., Easterby-Smith M., Lyles M. A. Organizational learning and knowledge management: Toward an integrative framework. Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management (2003) (Blackwell, Malden, MA) 122–141Google Scholar
• Victor B., Boynton A., Stephens-Jahng T. The effective design of work under total quality management. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(1):102–117Link, Google Scholar
• West S. G., Finch J. F., Curran P. J., Hoyle R. H. Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications (1995) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 56–75Google Scholar
• Winter S. G., Teece D. J. Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal (1987) (Ballinger Publishing, Cambridge, MA) 159–184Google Scholar
• Winter S. G., Baum J. A. C., Singh J. V. Organizing for continuous improvement: Evolutionary theory meets the quality revolution. Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations (1994) (Oxford University Press, New York) 90–108Google Scholar
• Zbaracki M. J. The rhetoric and reality of total quality management. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43(3):602–636Crossref, Google Scholar