Cooperative Planning, Uncertainty, and Managerial Control in Concurrent Design

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0641

References

  • Adler P. S. Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: The case of the design/manufacturing interface. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(2):147–167LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L. Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1982) 27:420–434CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blackburn J., Hoedemaker G., Van Wassenhove L. Concurrent software engineering: Prospects and pitfalls. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1996) 43(2):179–188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boynton A., Zmud R. Information technology planning in the 1990s: Directions for practice and research. MIS Quart. (1987) 11(1):59–72CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell D., Stanley J.Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963) (Rand McNally, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Chin W. W.PLS-Graph User’s Guide, Version 3.0 (2001) . Soft Modeling Inc., http://www.cis.gsu.edu/∼ghubona/info790/PLSGRAPH3.0Manual.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Clark K., Fujimoto T., Ferdows K. Overlapping problem-solving in product development. Managing International Manufacturing (1989) (Elsevier Science Publications, North-Holland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) 127–152Google Scholar
  • Clark K., Wheelwright S.Managing Produce and Process Development (1993) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Danielson H. Telediagnosis in the context of digital image analysis. Telektronikk,(Telemedicine) (1993) 89(1):37–41Google Scholar
  • Davenport T.Process Innovation (1993) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Galbraith J. Organization design: An information processing view. Interfaces (1974) 4(3):28–36LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gerwin D., Barrowman N. An evaluation of research on integrated product development. Management Sci. (2002) 48(7):938–953LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hammer M. Reengineering work: Don’t automate, obliterate. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1990) 68(4):104–111Google Scholar
  • Hartviksen G., Rinde E. Telecommunication for remote consultation and diagnosis. Telektronikk,(Telemedicine) (1993) 89(1):23–32Google Scholar
  • Henderson R., Clark K. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:9–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson R., Cockburn I. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:63–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoedemaker G., Blackburn J., Van Wassenhove L. Limits to concurrency. Decision Sci. (1999) 30(1):1–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Horner-Reich B., Benbasat I. Measuring the linkage between business and information technology objectives. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(1):55–81CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Horwitch M., Thietart R. The effect of business interdependencies on product R&D—Intensive business performance. Management Sci. (1987) 33(2):178–197LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Joglekar N., Yassine A., Eppinger S., Whitney D. Performance of coupled product development activities with a deadline. Management Sci. (2001) 47(12):1605–1620LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Krishnan V., Bhattacharya S. Technology selection and commitment in new product development: The role of uncertainty and design flexibility. Management Sci. (2002) 48(3):313–327LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Krishnan V., Ulrich K. Product development decisions. A review of the literature. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):1–21LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Krishnan V., Eppinger S., Whitney D. A model-based framework to overlap product development activities. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):437–451LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence P., Lorsch J.Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (1967) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Lederer A., Mendelow A. The coordination of information systems plans with business plans. J. Management Inform. Systems (1989) 6(2):5–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loch C., Terwiesch C. Communication and uncertainty in concurrent engineering. Management Sci. (1998) 44(8):1032–1049LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McDonald H., Scott-Morton M. S. Business strategy development, alignment and redesign. The Corporation of the 1990s (1991) (Oxford University Press, New York) 159–186Google Scholar
  • McFarlan W. Portfolio approach to information systems. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1981) 59(5):142–150Google Scholar
  • Mihm J., Loch C., Huchzermeier A. Problem-solving oscillations in complex engineering projects. Management Sci. (2003) 46(6):733–750LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mitchell V., Zmud R. The effects of coupling IT and work process strategies in redesign projects. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(4):424–438LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mitchell V., Zmud R. Endogenous adaptation: The effects of technology position and planning mode on IT-enabled change. Decision Sci. (2006) 37(3):325–355CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nordrum I. Remote frozen section service: A telepathology project in Northern Norway. Human Pathology (1991) 22:514–518CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pich M., Loch C., De Meyer A. On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management. Management Sci. (2002) 48(8):1008–1023LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sabherwal R., Chan Y. Alignment between business and IS strategies. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(1):11–33LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Safoutin M. J. A methodology for empirical measurement of iteration in engineering design processes. (2003) . Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
  • Safoutin M. J., Smith R. P. Classification of iteration in engineering design processes. Tenth Internat. ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conf. (1998) Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  • Schrader S., Riggs W., Smith R. Choice over uncertainty and ambiguity in technical problem solving. J. Engrg. Tech. Management (1993) 10(1):73–100CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H.Administrative Behavior (1976) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Smith R., Eppinger S. Identifying controlling features in engineering design iteration. Management Sci. (1997) 43(3):276–293LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sommer S., Loch C. Selectionism and learning in projects with complexity and unforeseeable uncertainty. Management Sci. (2004) 50(10):1334–1347LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tatikonda M. V., Rosenthal S. R. Technology novelty, project complexity, and product development project execution success. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2000) 47(1):74–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Terwiesch C., Loch C. Measuring effectiveness of overlapping development activities. Management Sci. (1999) 45(4):455–465LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Terwiesch C., Loch C., De Meyer A. Exchanging preliminary information in concurrent engineering: Alternative coordination strategies. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(4):402–419LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.