Resolving Inconsistencies in Utility Measurement Under Risk: Tests of Generalizations of Expected Utility

References

• Abdellaoui M. Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Management Sci. (2000) 46(11):1497–1512Link, Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H. Probability weighting in choice under risk: An empirical test. J. Risk Uncertainty (2001) 23(2):185–198Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H., Pinto J. L. A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis. Management Sci. (2000) 46(11):1485–1496Link, Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H., Pinto J. L. The validity of QALYs under non-expected utility. Econom. J. (2005) 115(April):533–550Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H., Schmidt U. A context-dependent model of the gambling effect. Management Sci. (2002) 48(6):802–812Link, Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt H., Pinto J. L., Wakker P. P. Making descriptive use of prospect theory to improve the prescriptive use of expected utility. Management Sci. (2001) 47(11):1498–1514Link, Google Scholar
• Bostic R., Herrnstein R. J., Luce R. D. The effect on the preference reversal of using choice indifferences. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1990) 13(2):193–212Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C., Edwards W. Recent tests of generalizations of expected utility theory. Utility: Theories, Measurement and Applications (1992) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) 207–251Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C. F., Hogarth R. M. The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. J. Risk Uncertainty (1999) 19(1–3):7–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cher D. J., Miyamoto J., Lenert L. A. Incorporating risk attitude into Markov-process decision models. Medical Decision Making (1997) 17(3):340–350Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conlisk J. Three variants on the Allais paradox. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1989) 79(3):392–407Google Scholar
• Delquié P. Inconsistent trade-offs between attributes: New evidence in preference assessment biases. Management Sci. (1993) 39(11):1382–1395Link, Google Scholar
• Delquié P. “Bi-matching”: A new preference assessment method to reduce compatibility effects. Management Sci. (1997) 43(5):640–658Link, Google Scholar
• de Wit G. A., van Busschbach J. J., de Charro F. T. Sensitivity and perspective in the valuation of health status. Health Econom. (2000) 9(2):109–126Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diecidue E., Schmidt U., Wakker P. P. The utility of gambling reconsidered. J. Risk Uncertainty (2004) 29(3):241–259Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doctor J. N., Miyamoto J. Deriving quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) from constant proportional time tradeoff and risk posture conditions. J. Math. Psych. (2003) 47(5):557–567Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doctor J. N., Bleichrodt H., Miyamoto J., Temkin N. R., Dikmen S. A new and more robust test of QALYs. J. Health Econom. (2004) 23(3):353–367Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer G. W., Hawkins S. A. Strategy compatibility, scale compatibility, and the prominence effect. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception Performance (1993) 19(3):580–597Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer G. W., Carmon Z., Ariely D., Zauberman G. Goal-based construction of preferences: Task goals and the prominence effect. Management Sci. (1999) 45(8):1057–1075Link, Google Scholar
• Gonzalez R., Wu G. On the form of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psych. (1999) 38(1):129–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gul F. A theory of disappointment aversion. Econometrica (1991) 59(3):667–686Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harless D., Camerer C. F. The predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories. Econometrica (1994) 62(6):1251–1289Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hershey J. C., Schoemaker P. J. H. Probability versus certainty equivalence methods in utility measurement: Are they equivalent? Management Sci. (1985) 31(10):1213–1231Link, Google Scholar
• Hertwig R., Ortmann A. Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? Behav. Brain Sci. (2001) 24(3):383–451Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller R. L., Kleinmuntz D. N. Is this the right time for a new decision analysis journal? Decision Anal. Soc. Newsletter (1998) 17(3Google Scholar
• Llewellyn-Thomas H., Sutherland H. J., Tibshirani R., Ciampi A., Till J. E., Boyd N. F. The measurement of patients’ values in medicine. Medical Decision Making (1982) 2(4):449–462Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCord M., de Neufville R. Lottery equivalents: Reduction of the certainty effect problem in utility assessment. Management Sci. (1986) 32(1):56–60Link, Google Scholar
• Miyamoto J. M., Eraker S. A. Parameter estimates for a QALY utility model. Medical Decision Making (1985) 5(2):191–213Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miyamoto J. M., Eraker S. A. A multiplicative model of the utility of survival duration and health quality. J. Experiment. Psych.: General (1988) 117(1):3–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison G. C. The endowment effect and expected utility. Scottish J. Political Econom. (2000) 47(2):183–197Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver A. The internal consistency of the standard gamble: Tests after adjusting for prospect theory. J. Health Econom. (2003) 22(4):659–674Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne J. W., Bettman J. R., Schkade D. A. Measuring constructed preferences: Towards a building code. J. Risk Uncertainty (1999) 19(1–3):243–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne J. W., Laughhunn D. J., Crum R. Translation of gambles and aspiration level effects in risky choice behavior. Management Sci. (1980) 26(10):1039–1060Link, Google Scholar
• Payne J. W., Laughhunn D. J., Crum R. Further tests of aspiration level effects in risky choice behavior. Management Sci. (1981) 27(8):953–958Link, Google Scholar
• Pinto-Prades J. L., Abellan-Perpiñan J. M. Measuring the health of populations: The veil of ignorance approach. Health Econom. (2005) 14(1):69–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pliskin J. S., Shepard D. S., Weinstein M. C. Utility functions for life years and health status. Oper. Res. (1980) 28(1):206–223Link, Google Scholar
• Quiggin J. Risk perception and risk aversion among Australian farmers. Australian J. Agricultural Econom. (1981) 25(2):160–169Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson A., Loomes G., Jones-Lee M. Visual analog scales, standard gambles, and relative risk aversion. Medical Decision Making (2001) 21(1):17–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rottenstreich Y., Hsee C. K. Money, kisses, and electric shocks: On the affective psychology of risk. Psych. Sci. (2001) 12(3):185–190Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rutten-van Mölken M. P., Bakker C. H., van Doorslaer E. K. A., van der Linden S. Methodological issues of patient utility measurement. Experience from two clinical trials. Medical Care (1995) 33(9):922–937Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shalev J. Loss aversion equilibrium. Internat. J. Game Theory (2000) 29(2):269–287Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith J. E., von Winterfeldt D. Decision analysis in Management Science. Management Sci. (2004) 50(5):561–574Link, Google Scholar
• Stalmeier P. F. M., Bezembinder T. G. G. The discrepancy between risky and riskless utilities: A matter of framing? Medical Decision Making (1999) 19(4):435–447Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starmer C. Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. J. Econom. Literature (2000) 38(2):332–382Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stiggelbout A. M., Kiebert G. M., Kievit J., Leer J. W. H., Stoter G., de Haes J. C. J. M. Utility assessment in cancer patients: Adjustment of time tradeoff scores for the utility of life years and comparison with standard gamble scores. Medical Decision Making (1994) 14(1):82–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sugden R. Reference-dependent subjective expected utility. J. Econom. Theory (2003) 111(2):172–191Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Fox C. Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psych. Rev. (1995) 102(2):269–283Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (1992) 5(4):297–323Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Sattath S., Slovic P. Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psych. Rev. (1988) 95(3):371–384Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu G., Gonzalez R. Curvature of the probability weighting function. Management Sci. (1996) 42(12):1676–1690Link, Google Scholar