The Fragility of Time: Time-Insensitivity and Valuation of the Near and Far Future

References

• Abele A. E., Petzwold P. Pragmatic use of categorical information in impression formation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1998) 75:347–358Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ainslie G.Breakdown of Will (2001) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ainslie G., Haendel V., Gottheil E., Druley K., Skodola T., Waxman H. The motives of the will. Etiology Aspects of Alcohol and Drug Abuse (1983) (Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL) 119–140Google Scholar
• Ainslie G., Haslam N., Loewenstein G. F., Elster J. Hyperbolic discounting. Choice Over Time (1992) (Russell Sage, New York) 57–92Google Scholar
• Alessi S. M., Petry N. M. Pathological gambling severity is associated with impulsivity in a delay discounting procedure. Behav. Processes (2003) 64:345–354Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D., Loewenstein G. F. When does duration matter in judgment and decision making? J. Experiment. Psych.: General (2000) 129(4):508–523Crossref, Google Scholar
• Block R. A., Zakay D. Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. (1997) 4(June):184–197Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaiken S., Trope Y.Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology (1999) (The Guilford Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Chapman G. B., Coups E. J. Time preferences and preventive health behavior: Acceptance of the influenza vaccine. Medical Decision Making (1999) 19:307–314Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coller M., Williams M. B. Eliciting individual discount rates. Experiment. Econom. (1999) 2:107–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebert J. E. J. The role of cognitive resources in the valuation of near and far future events. Acta Psychologica (2001) 108(September):155–171Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishburn P. C., Rubinstein A. Time preference. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1982) 23(3):677–694Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S., Loewenstein G. F., O'Donoghue T. Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. J. Econom. Literature (2002) 40:351–374Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederickson B. L., Kahneman D. Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1993) 65:44–55Google Scholar
• Gilbert D. T., Gilovich T., Griffin D. W., Kahneman D. Inferential correction. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (2002) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 167–184Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilovich T., Griffin D. W., Kahneman D.Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (2002) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green L., Fristoe N., Myerson J. Temporal discounting and preference reversals in choice between delayed outcomes. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. (1994) 1(3):383–389Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green L., Myerson J., McFadden E. Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward. Memory Cognition (1997) 25(5):715–723Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green P. E., Srinivasan V. Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. J. Consumer Res. (1978) 5:103–123Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green P. E., Wind Y. New way to measure consumers' judgments. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1975) 107–117Google Scholar
• Griffin D. W., Dunning D., Ross L. The role of construal processes in overconfident predictions about the self and others. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1990) 59:1128–1139Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gyrd-Hansen D., Søgaard J. Discounting life-years: Whither time preference? Health Econom. (1998) 7:121–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsee C. K. The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation of preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1996) 46:247–257Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):363–391Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kenny D. A., Judd C. M. Consequences of violating the independence assumption in analysis of variance. Psych. Bull. (1986) 99:422–431Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keren G., Roelefsma P. Immediacy and certainty in intertemporal choice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1995) 63:287–297Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirby K. Bidding on the future: Evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards. J. Experiment. Psych. General (1997) 126(1):54–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirby K., Marakovic N. N. Modeling myopic decisions: Evidence for hyperbolic delay-discounting within subjects and amounts. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1995) 64:22–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laibson D. Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quart. J. Econom. (1997) 112(2):443–477Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liberman N., Trope Y. The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1998) 75(July):5–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G. F. Anticipation and the valuation of delayed consumption. Econom. J. (1987) 97(387):666–684Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G. F. Frames of mind in intertemporal choice. Management Sci. (1988) 34:200–214Link, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G. F., Loewenstein G. F., Elster J. The fall and rise of psychological explanations in the economics of intertemporal choice. Choice Over Time (1992) (Russell Sage, New York) 3–34Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G. F., Prelec D. Negative time preference. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1991) 81(2):347–352Google Scholar
• Luce R. D. Reduction invariance and Prelec's weighting functions. J. Math. Psych. (2001) 45:167–179Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D. The probability weighting function. Econometrica (1998) 66:497–527Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D. Decreasing impatience: A criterion for non-stationary time preference and hyperbolic discounting. Scandinavian J. Econom. (2004) 106(3):511–532Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D., Loewenstein G. F. Decision making over time and under uncertainty: A common approach. Management Sci. (1991) 37:770–786Link, Google Scholar
• Rachlin H., Raineri A., Cross D. Subjective probability and delay. J. Experiment. Anal. Behav. (1991) 55:233–244Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D. Is time-discounting hyperbolic or subadditive? J. Risk Uncertainty (2001) 23:5–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Redelmeier D. A., Kahneman D. Patient's memories of painful medical treatments—Real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures. Pain (1996) 66:3–8Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenthal R., Rosnow R. L.Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis (1991) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Senior N. W.An Outline of the Science of Political Economy (1836) (Clowes and Sons, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Shelley M. K. Outcome signs, question frames and discount rates. Management Sci. (1993) 39:806–815Link, Google Scholar
• Soman D. The mental accounting of sunk time costs: Why time is not like money. J. Behav. Decision Making (2001) 14:169–185Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sultan F., Winer R. S. Time preferences for products and attributes and the adoption of technology-driven consumer durable innovations. J. Econom. Psych. (1993) 14:587–613Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler R. H. Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Econom. Lett. (1981) 8:201–207Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (1974) 185(4157):1124–1131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varey C. A., Kahneman D. Experiences extended across time: Evaluation of moments and episodes. J. Behav. Decision Making (1992) 5:169–185Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zakay D. Attention allocation policy influences prospective timing. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. (1998) 5(1):114–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zauberman G., Bettman J. R., Malkoc S. A., Kim B. K. Time horizon neglect: Prospective duration insensitivity in consumer preference. (2007) . Working paper, Wharton Shool, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar