Ranking Contingent Monitoring Systems

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0693

References

  • Baiman S., Demski J. Economically optimal performance evaluation and control systems. J. Accounting Res. (1980) 18:184–220CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conlon J. R. Two new conditions supporting the first-order approach to multi-signal principal-agent problems. (2006) . Working paper, Department of Economics, University of Mississippi, University, MSGoogle Scholar
  • Demougin D., Fluet C. Ranking of information systems in agency models: An integral condition. Econom. Theory (2000) 17:489–496CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dewatripont M., Jewitt I., Tirole J. The economics of career concerns, Part I: Comparing information structures. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1999) 66:183–198CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dye R. A. Optimal monitoring policies in agencies. Rand J. Econom. (1986) 17:339–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eeckhoudt L., Schlesinger H. Putting risk in its proper place. (2005) . Working Paper 1462, Ifo Center for Economic Studies (CESifo), Munich, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  • Grossman S., Hart O. An analysis of the principal-agent problem. Econometrica (1983) 51:7–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hemmer T., Kim O., Verecchia R. E. Introducing convexity into optimal compensation contracts. J. Accounting Econom. (2000) 28:307–327CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmström B. Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. (1979) 10:74–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jewitt I. Information and principal-agent problems. (1997) . Mimeo, University of Bristol, Bristol, UKGoogle Scholar
  • Keenan D. C., Snow A. Greater downside risk aversion. J. Risk Uncertainty (2002) 24:267–277CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim S. K. Efficiency of an information system in an agency model. Econometrica (1995) 63:89–102CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim S. K., Suh Y. S. Conditional monitoring under moral hazard. Management Sci. (1992) 38:1106–1120LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kimball M. S. Precautionary saving in the small and in the large. Econometrica (1990) 58:53–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lambert R. A. Variance investigation in agency settings. J. Accounting Res. (1985) 23:633–647CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Menezes C., Geiss C., Tressler J. Increasing downside risk. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1980) 70:921–932Google Scholar
  • Rajan M. V., Sarath B. The value of correlated signals in agencies. Rand J. Econom. (1997) 28:150–167CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sinclair-Desgagné B. The first-order approach to multi-signal principal-agent problems. Econometrica (1994) 62:459–465CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Young R. A. A note on “Economically optimal performance evaluation and control systems”: The optimality of two-tailed investigations. J. Accounting Res. (1986) 24:231–240CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.