Research Note—Strategic Bid-Shading and Sequential Auctioning with Learning from Past Prices

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0691

References

  • Caillaud B., Mezzetti C. Equilibrium reserve prices in sequential ascending auctions. J. Econom. Theory (2004) 117(1):78–95CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coase R. H. Durability and monopoly. J. Law Econom. (1972) 15(1):143–149CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conlisk J., Gerstner E., Sobel J. Cyclic pricing by a durable goods monopolist. Quart. J. Econom. (1984) 99(3):489–505CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jeitschko T. D. Equilibrium price paths in sequential auctions with stochastic supply. Econom. Lett. (1999) 64(1):67–72CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jofre-Bonet M., Pesendorfer M. Estimation of a dynamic auction game. Econometrica (2003) 71(5):1443–1489CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Juda A. I., Parkes D. C. The sequential auction problem: An analysis and solution. (2006) . Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • McAfee R. P., Vincent D. Sequentially optimal auctions. Games Econom. Behav. (1997) 18(2):246–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P., Weber R., Klemperer P. A theory of auctions and competitive bidding II. The Economic Theory of Auctions (2000) (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK) 179–194Google Scholar
  • Myerson R. B. Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. (1981) 6(1):58–73LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vulcano G., van Ryzin G., Maglaras C. Optimal dynamic auctions for revenue management. Management Sci. (2002) 48(11):1388–1407LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zeithammer R. Forward-looking bidding in online auctions. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(3):462–476CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.