The Effect of Digital Sharing Technologies on Music Markets: A Survival Analysis of Albums on Ranking Charts

References

• Adler M. Stardom and talent. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985) 75(1):208–212Google Scholar
• Alexander P. J. Digital distribution, free riders, and market structure: The case of the music recording industry. Rev. Indust. Organ. (2002) 20(2):151–161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakos Y., Brynjolfsson E., Lichtman D. Shared information goods. J. Law Econom. (1999) 42(1):117–155Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barua A., Konana P., Whinston A. B., Yin F. Driving e-business excellence. Sloan Management Rev. (2001) 43(1):36–44Google Scholar
• Bell A. M. Locally interdependent preferences in a general equilibrium environment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2002) 47:309–333Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belzil C. Unemployment insurance and unemployment over time: An analysis with event history data. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1995) 77(1):113–126Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bemuso.com Labels and publishers: All about record labels and music publishers. (2006) . Retrieved May 26, 2006, http://www.bemuso.com/musicbiz/labelsandpublishers.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Bhattacharjee S., Gopal R. D., Lertwachara K., Marsden J. R. Whatever happened to payola? An empirical analysis of online music sharing. Decision Support Systems (2006a) 42(2):104–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee S., Gopal R. D., Lertwachara K., Marsden J. R. Retailer strategies in the presence of online music sharing. J. Management Inform. Systems (2006b) 23(1):129–159Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee S., Gopal R. D., Lertwachara K., Marsden J. R. Impact of legal threats on individual behavior: An analysis of music industry actions and online music sharing. J. Law Econom. (2006c) 49(1):91–114Crossref, Google Scholar
• Billboard.com Billboard methodology. (2006) . Retrieved May 26, 2006, http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/about_us/bbmethodology.jspGoogle Scholar
• Boston W. Bertelsmann is betting that users, content rule with Napster deal. Wall Street J. (2000) November 2Google Scholar
• Bradburn M. J., Clark T. G., Love S. B., Altman D. G. Survival analysis part II: Multivariate data analysis—an introduction to concepts and methods. British J. Cancer (2003) 89:431–436Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradlow E. T., Fader P. S. A Bayesian lifetime model for the “Hot 100” billboard songs. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2001) 96:368–381Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Smith M. Frictionless commerce? A comparison of Internet and conventional retailers. Management Sci. (2000) 46(4):563–585Link, Google Scholar
• Chevalier J. A., Mazylin D. The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(3):345–354Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung K. H., Cox A. K. A stochastic model of superstardom: An application of the Yule distribution. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1994) 76(4):771–775Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crain W. M., Tollison R. D. Consumer choice and the popular music industry: A test of the superstar theory. Empirica (2002) 29(1):1–9Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cunningham B. M., Alexander P. J., Adilov N. Peer-to-peer file sharing communities. Inform. Econom. Policy (2004) 16(2):197–213Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Vany A., Walls W. D. Uncertainty in the movie industry: Does star power reduce the terror of the box office? J. Cultural Econom. (1999) 23:285–318Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Vany A., Walls W. D. Motion picture profit, the stable paretian hypothesis and the curse of the superstar. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (2004) 28(6):1035–1057Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhar R., Wertenbroch K. Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37:60–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evangelista B. CD Soars after net release. San Francisco Chronicle (2000) October 12Google Scholar
• Fader P. S. Expert Report of Peter S. Fader, Ph.D. in Record Companies and Music Publishers vs. Napster, July 26. (2000) . United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
• Gibson O. Gabriel's call to arms: OD2 has signed deals with all five major record labels to blaze a trail for paid-for music downloads on the net. Guardian (2003) April 28):46Google Scholar
• Goodley S. Disharmony over music pirates on the Internet. Telegraph (2003) January 9Google Scholar
• Google, Inc. Google Press Center Zeitgeist. (2006) . Retrieved May 26, 2006, http://www.google.com/press/zeitgeist.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Gopal R. D., Bhattacharjee S., Sanders G. L. Do artists benefit from online music sharing? J. Bus. (2006) 79(3):1503–1534Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gopal R. D., Sanders G. L., Bhattacharjee S., Agrawal M., Wagner S. A behavioral model of digital music piracy. J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commerce (2004) 14(2):89–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham J. Morpheus takes a stand—again. USA TODAY (2005a) March 10). http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/technology/2005-03-10-morpheus-usat_x.htmGoogle Scholar
• Graham L. iTunes more popular than most peer-to-peer file sharing services. NPD Group (2005b) June 7). http://www.npd.com/dynamic/releases/press_050607.htmGoogle Scholar
• Green H. Kissing off the big music labels. Businessweek (2004) September 6Google Scholar
• Hamlen W. A. Superstardom in popular music: Empirical evidence. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1991) 73(4):729–733Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harmon A. Suit settled for students downloading music online. New York Times (2003) May 2):A22Google Scholar
• International Federation of Phonographic Industry IFPI releases definitive statistics on global market for recorded music. (2005) . (August 2) London, UK, http://www.ifpi.org/site-content/publications/rin_order.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Kalbfleisch J. D., Prentice R. L.The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data (2002) (J. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiefer N. M. Analysis of grouped duration data. Contemporary Math. (1988) 80:107–139Crossref, Google Scholar
• King B. Napster: Music's friend or foe? Wired.com News (2000a) June 14Google Scholar
• King B. Napster's Good? Bad? Er, What? Wired.com News (2000b) June 15Google Scholar
• Knab C. Inside record labels: Organizing things. (2001) . Fourfront Media Music (August), http://www.musicbizacademy.com/knab/articles/insidelabels.htmGoogle Scholar
• Krider R. E., Weinberg C. B. Competitive dynamics and the introduction of new products: The motion picture timing game. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(February):1–15Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leibenstein H. Bandwagon, snob, and veblen effects in the theory of consumer demand. Quart. J. Econom. (1970) 64:183–207Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liebowitz S. Will MP3 downloads annihilate the record industry? The evidence so far. Adv. Stud. Entrepreneurship, Innovation, Econom. Growth (2004) 15:229–260Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liebowitz S. File sharing: Creative destruction or just plain destruction? J. Law Econom. (2006) 49(1):1–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacDonald G. M. The economics of rising stars. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1988) 78(1):155–166Google Scholar
• Mathews A. W. Sampling free music over the Internet often leads to a sale—Poll adds to conflicting data as recording industry sorts out web's impact. Wall Street J. (2000) June 15):A3Google Scholar
• Mathews A. W., Peers M. Teen music buying dropped last year, according to data. Wall Street J. (2000) June 26):B14Google Scholar
• Moe W. W., Fader P. S. Modeling hedonic portfolio products: A joint segmentation analysis of music compact disc sales. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38:376–385Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery A. L., Moe W. W. Should record companies pay for radio airplay? Investigating the relationship between album sales and radio airplay. (2000) . Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
• Musgrove M. RIAA plans to sue music swappers; no more warnings to individuals. Washington Post(June 26):E01Google Scholar
• Nelson P. Information and consumer behavior. J. Political Econom. (1970) 78(2):311–329Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oberholzer F., Strumpf K. The effect of file sharing on record sales: An empirical analysis. J. Political Econom. (2007) 115(1):1–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pastore M. Net users finding P2P music alternatives. (2001) October 11). http://www.clickz.com/stats/sectors/software/article.php/901921Google Scholar
• Peers M., Gomes L. Music CD sales suffer in stores near “wired” colleges, study says. Wall Street J. (2000) June 13):A4Google Scholar
• Ravid S. A. Information, blockbusters and stars: A study of the film industry. J. Bus. (1999) 72(4):463–492Crossref, Google Scholar
• Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) Yearend statistics. (2003) . Retrieved May 26, 2006, http://www.riaa.orgGoogle Scholar
• Rosen S. The economics of superstars. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1981) 71(5):845–858Google Scholar
• Seabrook J. The money note: Can the record business survive? New Yorker (2003) July):42–55Google Scholar
• Spellman P.Indie Power: A Business-Building Guide for Record Labels, Music Production Houses, and Merchant Musicians (2006) 2nd ed(MBS Business Media, Boston, MA) . http://www.mbsolutions.com/books/howtostart.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Stern C. Verizon identifies download suspects; firm says fight goes on to guard privacy. Washington Post (2003) June 6):E05Google Scholar
• Strobl E. A., Tucker C. The dynamics of chart success in the U.K. pre-recorded popular music industry. J. Cultural Econom. (2000) 24:113–134Google Scholar
• Towse R., Towse R., Khakee A. The earnings of singers: An economic analysis. Cultural Economics (1992) (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany) 209–217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walls W. D. Modeling movie success when “Nobody Knows Anything”: Conditional stable-distribution analysis of film returns. J. Cultural Econom. (2005a) 29:177–190Google Scholar
• Walls W. D. Modeling heavy tails and skewness in film returns. Appl. Financial Econom. (2005b) 15:1181–1188Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walls W. D., Rusco F., Ginsburgh V. Independent film finance, pre-sale agreements, and the distribution of film earnings. Economics of Art and Culture: Invited Papers at the 12th Internat. Conf. on the Association for Cultural Economics Internat. (2004) (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 19–32Contributions to Economic Analysis 260Google Scholar
• Yamada M., Kato H. A structural analysis of sales patterns of music CDs. INFORMS Marketing Sci. Conf. (2002) Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaGoogle Scholar
• Zeidler S. Streamcast says to mount peer-to-peer protest. Yahoo Technology News (2003) June 26). http:in.tech.yahoo.com/030627/137/25h1i.htmlGoogle Scholar