Campaign Spending Limits and Political Advertising

References

• Adaval R., Monroe K. Automatic construction and use of contextual information for product and price evaluations. J. Consumer Res. (2002) 28(4):572–588Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alesina A. Credibility and policy convergence in a two-party system with rational votes. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1988) 78(4):796–805Google Scholar
• Alesina A., Rosenthal H.Partisan Politics, Divided Government and the Economy (1995) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere S., Iyengar S.Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate (1995) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Besley T., Coate S. An economic model of representative democracy. Quart. J. Econom.112(1):85–114Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhadury J., Griffin P. M., Griffin S. O., Narasimhan L. S. Finding the majority-rule equilibrium under lexicographic comparison of candidates. Soc. Choice Welfare (1998) 15(4):489–509Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black D.Theory of Committees and Elections (1958) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Brians C. L., Wattenberg M. P. Campaign issue knowledge and salience: Comparing reception from TV commercials, TV news, and newspapers. Amer. J. Political Sci. (1996) 40(1):172–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butters G. R. Equilibrium distributions of sales and advertising prices. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1977) 44(3):465–491Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cain B., Ferejohn J., Fiorina M.The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence (1987) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castanheira M. Why vote for losers? J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. (2003) 1(5):1207–1238Crossref, Google Scholar
• Che H., Iyer G., Shanmugam R. Negative advertising and voter choice. (2007) . Working paper, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
• Columbia Journalism Review Red news, blue news: A search for meaning in a fog of facts. (2004) 43(4):6Google Scholar
• Coupé T. Purchasing power…on the link between money and votes. (2000) . Working paper, ECARES, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
• Dixit A., Londregan J. Redistributive politics and economic efficiency. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (1995) 89(4):856–866Crossref, Google Scholar
• Downs A.An Economic Theory of Democracy (1957) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Dutter L. E. Voter preferences, simple electoral games, and equilibria in two-candidate contests. Public Choice (1981) 37(3):403–423Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economist, The Politics brief: You pays your money…. (1999) July 31):45–46Google Scholar
• Economist, The Mayor Ken. (2000a) April 27):16Google Scholar
• Economist, The Red Ken rides again. (2000b) March 9):61Google Scholar
• Economist, The Come on, do what you say. (2002) October 31):33Google Scholar
• Economist, The A survey of America. (2005) July 16):13–15Google Scholar
• Economist Intelligence Unit, The Hungary country profile. (2005) October 1):10–14Google Scholar
• Federal Election Commission Presidential Public Funding Program. (1997) October 9). Federal Election Commission, Washington, D.C., http://www.fec.gov/Google Scholar
• Ferejohn J., Kuklinski J.Information and Democratic Processes (1990) (University of Illinois Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Friedman W. Campaign buying unabated. Television Week (2003) 22(38):6Google Scholar
• Gerber A. Estimating the effect of campaign spending on senate election outcomes using instrumental variables. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (1998) 92(2):401–411Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman G. M., Shapiro C. Informative advertising with differentiated products. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1984) 51(1):63–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamlin A., Hjortland M. Proportional representation with citizen candidates. Public Choice (2000) 103(3–4):205–230Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinich M. J. Equilibrium in spatial voting: The median voter result is an artifact. J. Econom. Theory (1977) 16(2):208–219Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinich M., Ledyard J., Ordeshook P. A theory of electoral equilibrium: A spatial analysis based on the theory of games. J. Politics (1973) 35(1):154–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hotelling H. Stability in competition. Econom. J. (1929) 39(153):41–57Google Scholar
• Hume S. Perot ads are top-of-mind among voters. Advertising Age (1992) November 2):1Google Scholar
• Iyer G., Soberman D. A., Villas-Boas J. M. The targeting of advertising. Marketing Sci. (2004) 24(3):461–476Link, Google Scholar
• Kahn K. F., Kenney P. J. Do negative campaigns mobilize suppress turnout? Clarifying the relationships between negativity and participation. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (1999) 93(4):877–889Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaid L. L., Holtz-Bacha C.Political Advertising in Western Democracies: Parties and Candidates on Television (1995) (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Lau R. R., Sigelman L., Heldman C., Babbitt P. The effects of negative political advertisements: A meta-analytic assessment. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (1999) 93(4):851–875Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine R. The dynamics of multi-candidate elections; menu-dependent preferences. (2002) . Chap. 2. Ph.D. dissertation, Duke University, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
• Liu C. KMT proves smart strategy can overcome a small budget. Media Asia (2004) April 23):22Google Scholar
• Lynch J. G., Chakravarti D., Mitra A. Contrast effects in consumer judgments: Changes in mental representations or in the anchoring of rating scales? J. Consumer Res. (1991) 18(3):284–297Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martinez M. D. Turnout effects on the composition of the electorate: A multinomial logit simulation of the 2000 presidential election. (2002) . Working paper, University of Florida, Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
• Palda F.Election Finance Regulation in Canada: A Critical Review (1991) (The Fraser Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) Google Scholar
• Palda F. The economics of campaign spending limits. Economia delle scelte pubbliche. J. Public Finance and Public Choice (1996) 2–3:113–137Google Scholar
• Palda F., Palda K. Ceilings on campaign spending: Hypothesis and partial test with canadian data. Public Choice (1985) 45(3):313–331Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pattie C., Johnston R., Fieldhouse E. Winning the local vote: The effectiveness of constituency campaign spending in Great Britain, 1983–1992. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (1995) 98(4):969–983Crossref, Google Scholar
• Persson T., Tabellini G.Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Prat A. Campaign advertising and voter welfare. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2002) 69(4):999–1017Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prothero N., Jenkins C. Political outlook, in country report Switzerland. The Economist Intelligence Unit (2005) October 12):1–2Google Scholar
• Sahuguet N., Persico N. Campaign spending regulation in a model of redistributive politics. Econom. Theory (2006) 28(1):95–124Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sen A. Maximization and the act of choice. Econometrica (1997) 65(4):745–779Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stokes D. E. Spatial models of party competition. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (1963) 57(2):368–377Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strömberg D. Mass media competition, political competition, and public policy. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2004) 71(246):265–284Crossref, Google Scholar
• Surlin S. H., Gordon T. F. Selective exposure and retention of political advertising. J. Advertising (1976) 5(1):32–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• UK Government (1998) . The funding of political parties in the United Kingdom, chaired by Lord Neill of Bladen, QC, http://www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm40/4057/contents.htmGoogle Scholar
• Wonnacott T. H., Wonnacott R. J.Introductory Statistics for Business and Economics (1990) 5th ed.(Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Xiang Y. Media bias in the market of political news. (2006) . Chap. 3. Ph.D. dissertation, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, FranceGoogle Scholar