Selecting a Selection Procedure

References

• Bechhofer R. E., Santner T. J., Goldsman D. M.Design and Analysis for Statistical Selection, Screening, and Multiple Comparisons (1995) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Bernardo J. M., Smith A. F. M.Bayesian Theory (1994) (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boesel J., Nelson B. L., Kim S.-H. Using ranking and selection to “clean” up after simulation optimization. Oper. Res. (2003) 51(5):814–825Link, Google Scholar
• Branke J., Schmidt C., Yao X., Burke E., Lozano J. A., Smith J., Merelo-Guervós J. J., Bullinaria J. A., Rowe J., Tino P., Kabán A., Schwefel H.-P. Sequential sampling in noisy environments. Parallel Problem Solving from Nature. Vol. 3242. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2004) (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York) 202–211Crossref, Google Scholar
• Branke J., Chick S. E., Schmidt C., Kuhl M., Steiger N., Armstrong F., Joines J. New developments in ranking and selection, with an empirical comparison of the three main approaches. Proc. 2005 Winter Simulation Conf. (2005) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ) 708–717Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butler J., Morrice D. J., Mullarkey P. W. A multiple attribute utility theory approach to ranking and selection. Management Sci. (2001) 47(6):800–816Link, Google Scholar
• Chen C.-H. A lower bound for the correct subset-selection probability and its application to discrete event simulations. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control (1996) 41(8):1227–1231Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen C.-H., Lin J., Yücesan E., Chick S. E. Simulation budget allocation for further enhancing the efficiency of ordinal optimization. Discrete Event Dynam. Systems: Theory Appl. (2000) 10(3):251–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen C.-H., Yücesan E., Dai L., Chen H. Efficient computation of optimal budget allocation for discrete event simulation experiment. IIE Trans. (2007) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Chen E. J., Kelton W. D. Sequential selection procedures: Using sample means to improve efficiency. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2005) 166(1):133–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chick S. E., Inoue K., Medeiros D. J., Watson E. J., Manivannan M., Carson J. Sequential allocation procedures that reduce risk for multiple comparisons. Proc. 1998 Winter Simulation Conf. (1998) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ) 669–676Google Scholar
• Chick S. E., Inoue K. New two-stage and sequential procedures for selecting the best simulated system. Oper. Res. (2001a) 49(5):732–743Link, Google Scholar
• Chick S. E., Inoue K. New procedures for identifying the best simulated system using common random numbers. Management Sci. (2001b) 47(8):1133–1149Link, Google Scholar
• Chick S. E., Inoue K. Corrigendum: New selection procedures. Oper. Res. (2002) 50(3):566Link, Google Scholar
• Chick S. E., Wu Y. Selection procedures with frequentist expected opportunity cost bounds. Oper. Res. (2005) 53(5):867–878Link, Google Scholar
• Dai L. Convergence properties of ordinal comparison in the simulation of discrete event systems. J. Optim. Theory Appl. (1996) 91(2):363–388Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Groot M. H.Optimal Statistical Decisions (1970) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Fu M. C., Hu J.-Q., Chen C.-H., Xiong X. Simulation allocation for determining the best design in the presence of correlated sampling. INFORMS J. Comput. (2007) 19(1):101–111Link, Google Scholar
• Goldsman D., Kim S.-H., Marshall W. S., Nelson B. L. Ranking and selection for steady-state simulation: Procedures and perspectives. INFORMS J. Comput. (2002) 14(1):2–19Link, Google Scholar
• Gupta S. S., Miescke K. J. Bayesian look ahead one stage sampling allocations for selecting the largest normal mean. Statist. Papers (1994) 35:169–177Crossref, Google Scholar
• He D., Chick S. E., Chen C.-H. The opportunity cost and OCBA selection procedures in ordinal optimization for a fixed number of alternative systems. IEEE Trans. Systems, Machines, Cybernetics C (2007) . ForthcomingCrossref, Google Scholar
• Inoue K., Chick S. E., Chen C.-H. An empirical evaluation of several methods to select the best system. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simulation (1999) 9(4):381–407Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim S.-H., Nelson B. L. A fully sequential procedure for indifference-zone selection in simulation. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simulation (2001) 11(3):251–273Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim S.-H., Nelson B. L., Henderson S. G., Nelson B. L. Selecting the best system. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Simulation (2006) (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 501–534Google Scholar
• Law A. M., Kelton W. D.Simulation Modeling and Analysis (2000) 3rd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Nelson B. L., Banerjee S. Selecting a good system: Procedures and inference. IIE Trans. (2001) 33(3):149–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson B. L., Goldsman D. Comparisons with a standard in simulation experiments. Management Sci. (2001) 47(3):449–463Link, Google Scholar