Coherence and Consistency of Investors' Probability Judgments

References

• Alpert M., Raiffa H., Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. A progress report on the training of probability advisors. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 294–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barber B., Odean T. Trading is hazardous to your wealth: The common stock investment performance of individual investors. J. Finance (2000) 55:773–806Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barber B., Odean T. Online investors: Do the slow die first? Rev. Financial Stud. (2002) 15:455–487Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N., Thaler R., Constantinides G. M., Harris M., Stulz R. A survey of behavioral finance. Handbook of the Economics of Finance (2003) (Elsevier, North-Holland, Amsterdam) 1052–1090Google Scholar
• Brier G. W. Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Monthly Weather Rev. (1950) 78:1–3Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budescu D. V., Wallsten T. S., Au W. T. On the importance of random error in the study of probability judgment. Part II: Applying the stochastic judgment model to detect systematic trends. J. Behav. Decision Making (1997a) 10:172–188Google Scholar
• Budescu D. V., Erev I., Wallsten T. S., Yates J. F. Introduction to special issue: Stochastic and cognitive models of confidence. J. Behav. Decision Making (1997b) 10:153–285Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budescu D. V., Kuhn K. M., Kramer K. M., Johnson T. Modeling certainty equivalents for imprecise gambles. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2002) 88:748–768Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daniel K. D., Hirshleifer D., Subrahmanyam A. Investor psychology and investor under- and overreactions. J. Finance (1998) 53:1839–1886Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daniel K. D., Hirshleifer D., Subrahmanyam A. Mispricing, covariance risk, and the cross section of security returns. J. Finance (2001) 5:921–965Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Bondt W. F. M., Thaler R., Jarrow R. A., Maksimovic V., Ziemba W. T. Financial decision making in markets and firms: A behavioral perspective. Finance, Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science (1995) 9(North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 385–410Chap. 13Google Scholar
• Du N., Budescu D. V. The effects of imprecise probabilities and outcomes in evaluating investment options. Management Sci. (2005) 51:1791–1803Link, Google Scholar
• Edwards W., Kleinmuntz B. Conservatism in human information processing. Formal Representation of Human Judgment (1968) (Wiley, New York) 17–52Google Scholar
• Erev I., Wallsten T. S., Budescu D. V. Simultaneous over- and underconfidence: The role of error in judgment processes. Psych. Rev. (1994) 101:519–527Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G., Hoffrage U., Kleinbolting H. Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psych. Rev. (1991) 98:506–528Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilovich T., Griffin D., Kahneman D.Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (2002) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser M., Langer T., Weber M. On the trend recognition and forecasting ability of professional traders. (2003) . CEPR Discussion Paper 3904, Center for Economic Policy Research, London, UKGoogle Scholar
• Hoch S. J. Counterfactual reasoning and accuracy in predicting personal events. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition (1985) 11:719–731Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jørgensen M., Teigen K. H., Moløkken K. Better sure than safe? Overconfidence in judgment based software development effort prediction intervals. J. Systems Software (2004) 70:79–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• Juslin P. An explanation of the hard-easy effect in studies of realism of confidence in one's general knowledge. Eur. J. Cognitive Psych. (1993) 5:55–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Juslin P. The overconfidence phenomenon as a consequence of informal experimenter guided selection of almanac items. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1994) 57:226–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Juslin P., Wennerholm P., Olsson H. Format-dependence in subjective probability calibration. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition (1999) 25:1038–1052Crossref, Google Scholar
• Juslin P., Winman A., Olsson H. Naive empiricism and dogmatism in confidence research: A critical examination of the hard-easy effect. Psych. Rev. (2000) 10:384–396Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A.Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keren G. Calibration and probability judgments: Conceptual and methodological issues. Acta Psychologica (1991) 77:217–273Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirchler E., Maciejovsky B. Simultaneous over- and underconfidence: Evidence from experimental asset markets. J. Risk Uncertainty (2002) 25:65–85Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klayman J., Busemeyer J., Hastie R., Medin D. L. Varieties of confirmation bias. Decision Making from a Cognitive Perspective (1995) (Academic Press, New York) 365–418Google Scholar
• Klayman J., Soll J., Gonzalez-Vallejo C., Barlas S. Overconfidence: It depends on how, what, and whom you ask. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1999) 79:216–247Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koriat A., Lichtenstein S., Fischhoff B. Reasons for confidence. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Learn. Memory (1980) 6:107–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn K. M., Budescu D. V. The relative importance of probabilities, outcomes, and vagueness in hazard risk decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1996) 68:301–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence M., Goodwin P., O'Connor M., Önkal D. Judgmental forecasting: A review of progress over the last 25 years. Internat. J. Forecasting (2006) 22:493–518Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein S., Fischhoff B. Do those who know more also know more about how much they know?: The calibration of probability judgments. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1977) 20:159–183Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein S., Fischhoff B., Phillips L. D., Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A.Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 306–334Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy A. H. A new vector partition of the probability score. J. Appl. Meteorology (1973) 12:595–600Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rottenstreich Y., Tversky A. Unpacking, repacking, and anchoring: Advances in support theory. Psych. Rev. (1997) 104:406–415Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russo J. E., Schoemaker P. J. H. Managing overconfidence. Sloan Management Rev. (1992) 33:7–17Google Scholar
• Seaver D. A., Von Winterfeldt D. V., Edwards W. Eliciting subjective probability distributions on continuous variables. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1978) 21:352–379Google Scholar
• Soll J. B. Determinants of overconfidence and miscalibration: The roles of random error and ecological structure. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1996) 65:117–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soll J. B., Klayman J. Overconfidence in interval estimates. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition (2004) 30:299–314Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teigen K. H., Jørgensen M. When 90% confidence intervals are 50% certain: On the credibility of credible intervals. Appl. Cognitive Psych. (2005) 19:455–475Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgments under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (1974) 185:1124–1131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Von Winterfeldt D., Edwards W.Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research (1986) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Winman A., Hansson P., Juslin P. Subjective probability intervals: How to reduce overconfidence by interval evaluation. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory Cognition (2004) 30:1167–1175Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yaniv I., Foster D. P. Graininess of judgment under uncertainty: An accuracy- informativeness trade-off. J. Experiment. Psych.: General (1995) 124:424–432Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yaniv I., Foster D. P. Precision and accuracy of judgmental estimation. J. Behavioral Decision Making (1997) 10:21–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yates J. F. External correspondence: Decomposition of the mean probability score. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1982) 30:132–156Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yates J. F.Judgment and Decision Making (1990) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar