The Role of Pre-Entry Experience, Entry Timing, and Product Technology Strategies in Explaining Firm Survival

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0737

References

  • Agarwal R., Bayus B. L. The market evolution and take-off of new product innovations. Management Sci. (2002) 48(5):1024–1041LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R., Sarkar M., Echambadi R. The conditioning effect of time on firm survival: A life cycle approach. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(8):971–994CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R., Franco A., Echambadi R., Sarkar M. Knowledge transfer through inheritance: Spinout generation, development and survival. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(4):501–522CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson P., Carroll G., Hannan M. Personal computer manufacturers. Organizations in Industry: Strategy, Structure, and Selection (1995) (Oxford University Press, New York) 37–58Google Scholar
  • Arthur B. W. Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events. Econom. J. (1989) 99:106–131Google Scholar
  • Baum J., Korn H., Kotha S. Dominant designs and population dynamics in telecommunications services: Founding and failure of facsimile service organizations 1965–1992. Soc. Sci. Res. (1994) 24:97–135CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bayus B. L. An analysis of product lifetimes in a technologically dynamic industry. Management Sci. (1998) 44(6):763–775LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Berndt E., Rappaport N. Price and quality of desktop and mobile personal computers: A quarter-century historical review. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91(2):268–273CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan T., Stern S., Trajtenberg M. Market segmentation and the sources of rents from innovation: Personal computers in the late 1980s. RAND J. Econom. (1997) 28:S17–S44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burgelman R. Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:24–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Busenitz L., Barney J. Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision making. J. Bus. Venturing (1997) 12(1):9–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll G., Hannan M.The Demography of Corporations and Industries (2000) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll G., Bigelow L., Seidel M., Tsai L. The fates of de novo and de alio producers in the American automobile industry: 1885–1981. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:117–137CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caves R. In praise of old I.O. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2007) 25(1):1–12CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caves R., Porter M. From entry barriers to mobility barriers: Conjectural decisions and contrived deterrence to new competition. Quart. J. Econom. (1977) 91(2):241–262CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chandy R., Tellis G. Organizing for radical product innovation: The overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(November):474–487CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chintagunta P., Erdem T., Rossi P., Wedel M. Structural modeling in marketing: Review and assessment. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(6):604–616LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Christensen C.The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Christensen C., Suarez F., Utterback J. Strategies for survival in fast-changing industries. Management Sci. (1998) 44(12):S207–S220LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Curry J., Kenney M. Beating the clock: Corporate responses to rapid change in the PC industry. California Management Rev. (1999) 42(1):8–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doraszelski U., Pakes A., Armstrong M., Porter R. A framework for applied dynamic analysis in IO. Handbook of Industrial Organization (2007) 3(Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) . Chap. 4Google Scholar
  • Dowell G., Swaminathan A. Racing and back-pedaling into the future: New product introduction and organizational mortality in the US bicycle industry: 1880–1918. Organ. Stud. (2000) 21(2):405–431CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ericson R., Pakes A. Markov-perfect industry dynamics: A framework for empirical work. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1995) 62:53–82CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gabel L.Competitive Strategies for Product Standards (1991) (McGraw-Hill, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Gort M., Klepper S. Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. Econom. J. (1982) 92(3):630–653Google Scholar
  • Hannan M., Freeman J. Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1984) 49:149–164CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helfat C., Lieberman M. The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of pre-history. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11(4):725–760CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iansiti M., Clark K. Integration and dynamic capability: Evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers. Indust. Corporate Change (1994) 4:557–605CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jenkins S. Survival analysis. (2005) . University of Essex Lecture Notes, July 18. Retrieved January 25, 2006 from http://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/teaching/degree/stephenj/ec968/pdfs/ec968lnotesv6.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Jones N. Competing after radical technological change: The significance of product line management strategy. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:1265–1287CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jovanovic B., Nyarko Y. Learning by doing and the choice of technology. Econometrica (1996) 64(6):1299–1310CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King A., Tucci C. Incumbent entry into new market niches: The role of experience and managerial choice in the creation of dynamic capabilities. Management Sci. (2002) 48(2):171–186LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper S. Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1996) 86(3):562–583Google Scholar
  • Klepper S. Firm survival and the evolution of oligopoly. Rand J. Econom. (2002) 33(1):37–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper S., Simons K. Dominance by birthright: Entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the U.S. television receiver industry. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10–11):997–1016CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Kulatilaka N. Options thinking and platform investments: Investing in opportunity. California Management Rev. (1994) 36(Winter):52–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lavin M.Business Information: How to Find It, How to Use It (1992) (Oryz Press, Phoenix, AZ) Google Scholar
  • Lieberman M., Montgomery D. First-mover (dis)advantages: Retrospective and link with the resource-based view. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(12):1111–1125CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Macieira J. Extending the frontier: A structural model of investment and technological competition in the supercomputer industry. (2006) . Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath M.Product Strategy for High Technology Companies (2001) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Meyer M., Roberts E. New product strategy in small technology-based firms: A pilot study. Management Sci. (1986) 32(7):806–821LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mishina Y., Pollock T., Porac J. Are more resources always better for growth? Resources stickiness in market and product expansion. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25:1179–1197CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nault B., Vandenbosch M. Eating your own lunch: Protection through preemption. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(3):342–358LinkGoogle Scholar
  • PC Tech Guide, The Historical perspective. (2004) . Retrieved February 20, 2006, http://www.pctechguide.com/02procs_Historical_perspective.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Penrose E.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1959) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R.External Control of Organizations (1978) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Porter M. How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1979) 57(2):137–145Google Scholar
  • Schilling M. Technological lockout: An integrative model of the economic and strategic factors driving technology success and failure. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(2):267–284CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson O. Letting the market work for you: An evolutionary perspective on product strategy. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(2):577–592CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stavins J. Estimating demand elasticities in a differentiated product industry: The personal computer market. (1995a) . Working Paper 95-9, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Stavins J. Model entry and exit in a differentiated-product industry: The personal computer market. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1995b) 77(4):571–584CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steffens J.New Games: Strategic Competition in the PC Revolution (1994) (Pergamon Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Stern I., Henderson A. Within-business diversification in technology-intensive industries. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25:487–505CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stinchcombe A., March J. G. Social structure and organizations. Handbook of Organizations (1965) (Rand McNally, Chicago, IL) 153–193Google Scholar
  • Swaminathan A. The proliferation of specialist organizations in the American wine industry, 1941–1990. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40:653–680CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swanson A. Form coherence and the fates of De Alio and De Novo organizations in the U.S. digital computer industry: 1951–1994. (2002) . Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Teagarden L., Echols A., Hatfield D. The value of patience and start-up firms: A re-examination of entry timing for emerging markets. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice (2000) 24(4):41–48CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy. Res. Policy (1986) 15(6):285–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tripsas M. Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(Special Issue):119–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M., Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31(3):439–465CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Utterback J.Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation (1994) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Utterback J., Kim L., Kleindorfer P. Invasion of a stable business by radical innovation. The Management of Productivity Technology in Manufacturing (1986) (Plenum Press, New York) 113–151Google Scholar
  • Wade J. Dynamics of organizational communities and technological bandwagons: An empirical investigation of community evolution in the microprocessor market. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16(Special Issue):111–133CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.