Generating Objectives: Can Decision Makers Articulate What They Want?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0754

References

  • Baron J. Confusion of relative and absolute risk in valuation. J. Risk Uncertainty (1997) 14:301–309CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barrett R.Building a Values-Driven Organization (2006) (Elsevier, Burlington, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beach L. R.Image Theory: Decision Making in Personal and Organizational Contexts (1990) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bettman J. R., Luce M. F., Payne J. W. Constructive consumer choice processes. J. Consumer Res. (1998) 25(3):187–217CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clemen R. T. Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography (with discussion). Internat. J. Forecasting (1989) 5:559–583CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drucker P. F.The Practice of Management (1954) (Harper, New York) Google Scholar
  • Fischhoff B. Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception Performance (1975) 1(3):288–299CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischhoff B., Slovic P., Lichtenstein S. Fault trees: Sensitivity of assessed failure probabilities to problem representation. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception Performance (1978) 4(2):330–344CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fox C. R., Clemen R. T. Subjective probability assessment in decision analysis: Partition dependence and bias toward the ignorance prior. Management Sci. (2005) 51(9):1417–1432LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Franklin B.Letter to Joseph Priestly (1772) . (Reprinted in W. Isaacson, ed. 2005. A Benjamin Franklin Reader. Simon & Schuster, New York.)Google Scholar
  • Gilbride T. J., Allenby G. M. A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):391–406LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A.Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney R. L.Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Keeney R. L. Developing of a foundation for strategy at Seagate software. Interfaces (1999) 29(6):4–15LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney R. L., Raiffa H.Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (1976) (Wiley, New York) . (Reprinted by Cambridge University Press, 1993.)Google Scholar
  • Kerr N. L., Tindale R. S. Group performance and decision making. Ann. Rev. Psych. (2004) 55:623–655CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leon O. G. Value-focused thinking versus alternative-focused thinking: Effects on generation of objectives. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1999) 80(3):213–227CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lussier D. A., Olshavsky R. W. Task complexity in brand choice. J. Consumer Res. (1979) 6(2):154–165CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nietzsche F.The Wanderer and His Shadow (1879) . (Reprinted in G. Colli, M. Montinari, eds. 1980. Friedrich Nietzsche, Sämtliche Werke: Kritische Studienausgabe. de Gruyter, Berlin.)Google Scholar
  • Nutt P. C. Evaluating complex strategic choices. Management Sci. (1998) 44(8):1148–1166LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Payne J. W., Bettman J. R., Johnson E. J.The Adaptive Decision Maker (1993) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Payne J. W., Bettman J. R., Schkade D. A. Measuring constructed preference: Towards a building code. J. Risk Uncertainty (1999) 19(3):243–270CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peters T., Waterman R.In Search of Excellence (1982) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Rulke D. L., Galaskiewicz J. Distribution of knowledge, group network structure and group performance. Management Sci. (2000) 46(5):612–625LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Russo J. E., Kolzow K. Where is the fault in fault trees? J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception Performance (1994) 20(1):17–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. (1955) 69:99–115CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A., Slovic P., Sattah S. Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psych. Rev. (1988) 95(3):371–384CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.