Is the Tendency to Engage in Entrepreneurship Genetic?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0761

References

  • Ahmed S. nAch, risk taking, locus of control and entrepreneurship. Personality and Individual Differences (1985) 6(6):781–782CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Akaike H. Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika (1987) 52:317–332CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aldrich H. E., Kim P., Ruef M., Lounsbury M. A life course perspective on occupational inheritance: Self-employed parents and their children. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (2007) (Elsevier, Amsterdam) 33–82Google Scholar
  • Aldrich H., Wiedenmayer G., Katz J., Brockhaus R. From traits to rates: An ecological perspective on organizational foundings. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth (1993) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 145–195Google Scholar
  • Aldrich H., Rosen B., Woodward W., Churchill N., Hornaday J., Kirchhoff B., Krasner O., Vesper K. The impact of social networks on business foundings and profit: A longitudinal study. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research (1987) (Babson College, Babson Park, MA) 154–168Google Scholar
  • Amit R., Muller E., Cockburn I. Opportunity costs and entrepreneurial activity. J. Bus. Venturing (1995) 10(2):95–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andrew T., Hart D. J., Sneider H., de Lange M., Spector T. D., MacGregor A. J. Are twins and singletons comparable? A study of disease-related and lifestyle characteristics in adult women. Twin Res. (2001) 4:464–477CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arvey R., Bouchard T., Segal N., Abraham L. Job satisfaction: Environmental and genetic components. J. Appl. Psych. (1989) 74(2):187–192CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron R. A. The cognitive perspective: A valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship's basic “why” questions. J. Bus. Venturing (2004) 19(2):221–239CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron R., Markman G. Beyond social capital: The role of entrepreneurs' social competence in their financial success. J. Bus. Venturing (2003) 18(1):41–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barrick M. R., Mount M. K. The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psych. (1991) 44:1–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bates T. Self employment entry across industry groups. J. Bus. Venturing (1995) 12:109–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Behrman J. R., Taubman P. Is schooling “mostly in the genes? J. Political Econom. (1989) 97:1425–1446CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benjamin J., Ebstein R. P., Belmaker R. H., Benjamin J., Ebstein R. P., Belmaker R. H. Genes for human personality traits: Endophenotypes of psychiatric disorders? Molecular Genetics and the Human Personality (2003) (American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.) 333–343Google Scholar
  • Benjamin J., Li L., Patterson C., Greenburg B. D., Murphy D. L., Hamer D. H. Population and familial association between the D4 dopamine receptor gene and measures of novelty seeking. Nature Genetics (1996) 12:81–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berridge K. C., Robinson T. E. What is the role of dopamine in reward: Hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Res. Rev. (1998) 28(3):309–369CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Betsworth D., Bouchard T., Cooper C., Grotevant H., Hansen J., Scarr S., Weinberg R. Genetic and environmental influences on vocational interests assessed using adoptive and biological families and twins reared together and apart. J. Vocational Behav. (1994) 44:263–278CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bitler M. P., Moskowitz T., Vissing-Jørgensen A. Testing agency theory with entrepreneur effort and wealth. J. Finance (2005) 60(2):539–576CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bouchard T. Genetic and environmental influences on intelligence and special mental abilities. Human Biology (1998) 70(2):257–259Google Scholar
  • Bouchard T., Propping J.Twins as a Tool of Behavioral Genetics (1993) (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK) Google Scholar
  • Bouchard T., Lykken D., McGue N., Segal N., Tellegen A. Sources of human psychological difference: The Minnesota study of twins reared apart. Science (1990) 12(October):223–228CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bouchard T. J., Loehlin J. C. Genes, evolution and personality. Behav. Genetics (2001) 31:243–273CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bouchard T. J., Segal N. L., Tellegen A., McGue M., Keyes M., Krueger R., DiLalla L. F. Genetic influence on social attitudes: Another challenge to psychology from behavioural genetics. Behavior Genetics Principles: Perspectives in Development, Personality, and Psychopathology (2004) (American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.) 89–104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Browne M. W., Hawkins D. M. Covariance structures. Topics in Applied Multivariate Analysis (1982) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 72–141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Browne M. W. Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. British J. Math. Statist. Psych. (1984) 37:62–83CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bulik C. M., Sullivan P. F., Wade T. D., Kendler K. S. Twin studies of eating disorders. Internat. J. Eating Disorders (2000) 27(1):1–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burke A. E., FitzRoy F. R., Nolan M. A. When less is more: Distinguishing between entrepreneurial choice and performance. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. (2000) 62:567–587CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Busenitz L. Entrepreneurial risk and strategic decision making. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. (1999) 35(3):325–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carey G.Human Genetics for the Social Sciences (2003) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cherny S. S., DeFries J. C., Fulker D. W. Multiple regression of twin data: A model-fitting approach. Behav. Genetics (1992) 22:489–497CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clouse V. A controlled experiment relating entrepreneurial education to students' start-up decisions. J. Small Bus. Management (1990) 28:45–53Google Scholar
  • Comings D., Rosenthal R. J., Lesieur H. R., Rugle L. J., Muhleman D., Chiu C., Dietz G., Gade R. A study of the dopamine receptor gene in pathological gambling. Pharmacogenetics (1996) 6(3):223–234CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper A., Woo C., Dunkelberg W. Entrepreneurs' perceived chances for success. J. Bus. Venturing (1988) 3(2):97–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cropanzano R., James K. Some methodological considerations for the behavioral genetic analysis of work attitudes. J. Appl. Psych. (1990) 75(4):433–439CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyphers L. H., Phillips K., Fulker D. W., Mrazek D. A. Twin temperament during the transition from infancy to early childhood. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry (1990) 29:392–397CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Delmar F., Davidsson P. Where do they come from? Prevalence and characteristics of nascent entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Regional Development (2000) 12:1–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Delmar F., Shane S. Does business planning facilitate the development of new ventures? Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(12):1165–1185CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Wit G., van Widen F. A. A. M. An empirical analysis of self employment in the Netherlands. Small Bus. Econom. (1989) 1:263–272CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eaves L. J., Eysenck H. J., Martin N. G.Genes, Culture and Personality: An Empirical Approach (1989) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Ebstein R. P., Novick O., Umansky R., Priel B., Osher Y., Blaine D. Dopamine D4 receptor (D4DR) exon III polymorphism associated with the human personality trait novelty-seeking. Nature Genetics (1996) 12:78–80CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evans D., Leighton L. Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1989) 79:519–535Google Scholar
  • Fairlie R. The absence of African-American owned businesses: An analysis of the dynamics of self-employment. J. Labor Econom. (1999) 17(1):80–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Falconer D.Introduction to Quantitative Genetics (1989) (Longman Group, Harlow, Essex, UK) Google Scholar
  • Gaglio C. M., Katz J. A. The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Small Bus. Econom. (2001) 16(2):95–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gartner W. Who is an entrepreneur? Is the wrong question. Amer. J. Small Bus. (1988) 12(4):11–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gartner W., Carter N., Acs Z., Audretsch D. Entrepreneurial behaviour and firm organizing proceses. Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research (2003) (Kluwer, Boston) 195–222Google Scholar
  • Gottfredson L. S., Savickas M. L., Spokane A. R. The nature and nurture of vocational interests. Vocational Interests: Their Meaning, Measurement, and Use in Counseling (1999) (Davies-Black, Palo Alto, CA) 57–85Google Scholar
  • Hakim A. J., Cherkas L. F., Grahame R., Spector T. D., MacGregor A. J. The genetic epidemiology of joint hypermobility: A population study of female twins. Arthritis & Rheumatism (2004) 50(8):2640–2644CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hettema J. M., Neale M. C., Kendler K. S. Physical similarity and the equal environment assumption in twin studies of psychiatric disorders. Behav. Genetics (1995) 25:327–335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hull D., Bosley J., Udell G. Renewing the hunt for the Heffalump: Identifying potential entrepreneurs by personality characteristics. J. Small Bus. Management (1980) 18:11–18Google Scholar
  • Jang K. L., Livesley W. J., Vernon P. A. Heritability of the big five personality dimensions and their facets: A twin study. J. Personality (1996) 64:577–591CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joreskog K. New developments in Lisrel: Analysis of ordinal variables using polychoric correlations and weighted least squares. Quality Quantity (1990) 24:387–404CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keller L., Bouchard T., Arvey R., Segal N., Dawes R. Work values: Genetic and environmental influences. J. Appl. Psych. (1992) 77(1):79–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kendler K. S., Eaves L. J. Models for the joint effects of genotype and environment on liability to psychiatric illness. Amer. J. Psychiatry (1986) 143:279–289CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kendler K. S., Thornton L. M., Pedersen N. L. Tobacco consumption in Swedish twins reared together and reared apart. Arch. General Psychiatry (2000) 57:886–892CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kendler K. S., Neale M. C., Kessler R. C., Heath A. C., Eaves L. J. A test of the equal environment assumption in twin studies of psychiatric illness. Behav. Genetics (1993) 23:21–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kolvereid L. Organisational employment versus self employment: Reasons for career choice intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice (1996) 20(3):23–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krueger N. Growing up entrepreneurial. Acad. Management Proc. (1993) Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  • Lichtenstein P., Pedersen N. L., McClearn G. E. Genetic and environmental predictors of socioeconomic status. Behav. Genetics (1992) 22:731–732Google Scholar
  • Luthje C., Franke N. The “making” of an entrepreneur: Testing a model of entrepreneurial intent among engineering students at MIT. R&D Management (2003) 33(2):135–147CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lykken D., Bouchard T., McGue M., Tellegen A. Heritability of interests: A twin study. J. Appl. Psych. (1993) 78(4):649–661CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacGregor A., Spector T., Sneider H., MacGregor A. Practical approaches to account for bias and confounding in twin data. Advances in Twin and Sib-Pair Analysis (2000) (Greenwich Medical Media, London) 35–52Google Scholar
  • Martin N. G., Eaves L. J. The genetic analysis of covariance structure. Heredity (1977) 38(1):79–95CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martin N. G., Martin P. G. The inheritance of scholastic abilities in a sample of twins: Ascertainment of the sample and diagnosis of zygosity. Ann. Human Genetics (1975) 39:213–218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McClelland D.The Achieving Society (1961) (Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGue M., Bouchard T. Adjustment of twin data for the effects of age and sex. Behav. Genetics (1984) 14:325–343CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGue M., Bouchard T. J. Genetic and environmental influences on human behavioral differences. Annual Rev. Neuroscience (1998) 21:1–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGue M., Wette R., Rao D. A Monte Carlo evaluation of three statistical methods used in path analysis. Genetic Epidemiology (1987) 429:129–155CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mesch G. S., Czamanski D. Occupational closure and immigrant entrepreneurship: Russian Jews in Israel. J. Socio-Economics (1997) 26(6):597–610CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moffitt T. E., Caspi A., Rutter M. Strategy for investigating interactions between measured genes and measured environments. Arch. General Psychiatry (2005) 62:473–481CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mohammed I., Cherkas L. F., Riley S. A., Spector T. D., Trudgill N. J. Genetic influences in gastro-oesophageas reflux disease: A twin study. Gut (2003) 52:1085–1089CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moloney D. P., Bouchard T. J., Segal N. L. A genetic and environmental analysis of the vocational interests of monozygotic and dizygotic twins reared apart. J. Vocational Behav. (1991) 39(1):76–109CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neale M. C.Mx Software (2004) (Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA) Google Scholar
  • Neale M. C., Maes H. H. M.Methodology for Genetic Studies of Twins and Families (2002) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Neale M. C., Cardon L. R.Methodology for Genetic Studies of Twins and Families (1992) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parker S. C.The Economics of Self-Employment and Entrepreneurship (2004) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pearlman E. M., Ganon J. A.Raising Twins: What Parents Want to Know, and What Twins Want to Tell Them (2000) (Harper Resource, New York) Google Scholar
  • Peeters H., Gestel S., Vlietinck R., Derom C., Derom R. Validation of a telephone zygosity questionnaire in twins of known zygosity. Behav. Genetics (1998) 28(3):159–163CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Plomin R., Daniels D. Why are children in the same family so different from one another? Behav. Brain Sci. (1987) 10(1):1–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Plomin R., Spinath F. M. Intelligence: Genetics, genes, and genomics. J. Personality Social Psych. (2004) 86:112–129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Plomin R., Walker S. O. Genetics and educational psychology. British J. Educational Psych. (2003) 73:3–14CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Plomin R., DeFries J. C., Loehlin J. C. Genotype-environment interaction and correlation in the analysis of human behavior. Psych. Bull. (1977) 84:309–322CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Plomin R., DeFries J. C., McClearn G. E.Behavioral Genetics: A Primer (1990) 2nd ed.(Freeman, New York) Google Scholar
  • Plomin R., DeFries J. C., McClearn G. E., McGuffin P.Behavioral Genetics (2001) 4th ed.(Worth Publishers, New York) Google Scholar
  • Plomin R., Lichtenstein P., Pedersen N. L., McClearne G. E., Nesselroade J. R. Genetic influence on life events during the last half of the life span. Psych. Aging (1990) 5:25–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reynolds P., Carter N., Gartner W., Greene P. The prevalence of nascent entrepreneurs in the United States: Evidence from the panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics. Small Bus. Econom. (2004) 23:263–284CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Riemann R., Angleitner A., Strelau J. Genetic and environmental influences on personality: A study of twins reared together using the self- and peer report NEO-FFI scales. J. Personality (1997) 65:449–475CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ritsila J., Tervo H. Effects of unemployment on new firm formation: Micro-level panel data evidence from Finland. Small Bus. Econom. (2002) 19:31–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rowe D. C.The Limits of Family Influence (1994) (Guilford Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Rowe D. C., Plomin R., DeFries J. C., Craig I. W., McGuffin P. Assessing genotype X environment interactions and correlations in a postgenomic world. Behavioral Genetics in the Postgenomic Era (2003) (American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.) 71–99CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ruef M., Aldrich H., Carter N. The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among U.S. entrepreneurs. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2003) 68:195–222CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scarr S. Developmental theories for 1990s: Development and individual differences. Child Development (1992) 63:1–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scarr S., Carter-Saltzman L. Twin method: Defense of a critical assumption. Behav. Genetics (1979) 9:527–542CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Segal N.Entwined Lives: Twins and What They Tell Us About Human Behavior (1999a) (Dutton, New York) Google Scholar
  • Segal N. New twin studies show…the career of your dreams may be the career of your genes. Psych. Today (1999b) 32(Sept.–Oct.):54–70Google Scholar
  • Segal N.Indivisible by Two: Lives of Extraordinary Twins (2005) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Sham P.Statistics in Human Genetics (1998) (Arnold, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Sham P. C., Walters E. E., Neale M. C., Heath A. C., MacLean C. J., Kendler K. S. Logistic regression analysis of twin data: Estimation of parameters of the multifactorial liability-threshold model. Behav. Genetics (1994) 24:229–238CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11:448–469LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S.A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus (2003) (Edward Elgar Publishing, Aldershot, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S., Venkataraman S. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:217–226Google Scholar
  • Singer J. J., MacGregor A. J., Cherkas L. F., Spector T. D. Where did I leave my keys? A twin study of self-reported memory ratings using the multifactorial memory questionnaire. Twin Res. Human Genetics (2005) 8(2):108–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson J., Ruef M., Lounsbury M. Closure versus exposure: Mechanisms in the intergenerational transition of self-employment. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (2007) (Elsevier, Amsterdam) 83–124Google Scholar
  • Souitaris V., Zerbinati S., Al-Laham A. Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. J. Bus. Venturing (2007) 22(4):566–591CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spector T., Cicuttini F., Baker J., Loughlin J., Hart D. Genetic influences on osteoarthritis in women: A twin study. British Medical J. (1996) 312:940–944CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stewart W., Roth P. Risk taking propensity differences between entrepreneurs and managers: A meta-analytic review. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86(1):145–153CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tambs K., Sundet J. M., Magnus P., Berg K. Genetic and environmental contributions to the covariance between occupational status, educational attainment and IQ: A study of twins. Behav. Genetics (1989) 19:209–222CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taubman P. The determinants of earnings: Genetics, family, and other environments; A study of white male twins. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1976) 66:858–870Google Scholar
  • Taylor M. Earnings, independence or unemployment: Why become self-employed? Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. (1996) 58(2):253–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thornton P., Flynn K., Acs Z., Audretsch D. Entrepreneurship, networks and geographies. Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research (2003) (Kluwer, Boston) 401–436Google Scholar
  • Turkheimer E., D'Onofrio B. M., Maes H. H., Eaves L. J. Analysis and interpretation of twin studies with measured environments. Child Development (2005) 76(6):1217–1233CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uusitalo R. “Homo entreprenaurus? Appl. Econom. (2001) 33:1631–1638CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Praag C., Cramer J. The roots of entrepreneurship and labour demand: Individual ability and low aversion. Economica (2001) 68(269):45–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Volkow N. D. Mediation of saliency in health and addiction. 157th Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association (2004) New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • White R., Thornhill S., Hampson E. Entrepreneurs and evolutionary biology: The relationship between testosterone and new venture creation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2006) 100:21–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • White R., Thornhill S., Hampson E. A biosocial model of entrepreneurship: The combined effects of nurture and nature. J. Organ. Behav. (2007) 28:451–466CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.