Incorporating Asymmetric Distributional Information in Robust Value-at-Risk Optimization

References

• Artzner P., Delbaen F., Eber J. M., Heath D. Thinking coherently. Risk (1997) 10:68–71Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal A., Nemirovski A. Robust convex optimization. Math. Oper. Res. (1998) 23(4):769–805Link, Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal A., Nemirovski A. Robust solutions to uncertain programs. Oper. Res. Lett. (1999) 25:1–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal A., Nemirovski A.Lectures on Modern Convex Optimization: Analysis, Algorithms, and Engineering Applications (2001) (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia) MPS-SIAM Series on OptimizationCrossref, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D., Sim M. The price of robustness. Oper. Res. (2004) 52(1):35–53Link, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D., Pachamanova D., Sim M. Robust linear optimization under general norms. Oper. Res. Lett. (2004) 32:510–516Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cambell J., Lo A., MacKinlay A.The Econometrics of Financial Markets (1997) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Cariño D. R., Turner A. L., Ziemba W. T., Mulvey J. M. Multiperiod asset allocation with derivative assets. Worldwide Asset and Liability Modeling (1998) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) 182–204Google Scholar
• Chen W., Sim M. Goal driven optimization. Oper. Res. (2006) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Chen X., Sim M., Sun P. A robust optimization perspective on stochastic programming. Oper. Res. (2007) 55(6):1058–1071Link, Google Scholar
• Dowd K.Beyond Value at Risk: The New Science of Risk Management (1998) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Duffee G. The long-run behavior of firms' stock returns: Evidence and interpretations. (2002) . Working paper, Haas School of Business, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
• El Ghaoui L., Oks M., Oustry F. Worst-case value-at-risk and robust portfolio optimization: A conic programming approach. Oper. Res. (2003) 51(4):543–556Link, Google Scholar
• El Ghaoui L., Oustry F., Lebret H. Robust solutions to uncertain semidefinite programs. SIAM J. Optim. (1998) 9(1):33–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama E.Foundations of Finance (1976) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Föllmer H., Schied A., Sandmann K., Schönbucher P. Robust preferences and convex measures of risk. Advances in Finance and Stochastics (2002) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) 39–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jorion P.Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk (2000) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Konno H., Yamazaki H. Mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and its applications to the Tokyo stock market. Management Sci. (1991) 37(5):519–531Link, Google Scholar
• Larsen N., Mausser H., Uryasev S., Pardalos P., Tsitsiringos V. K. Algorithms for optimization of value-at-risk. Financial Engineering, e-Commerce and Supply Chain (2002) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) 129–157Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy H. Stochastic dominance and expected utility: Survey and analysis. Management Sci. (1992) 38(4):555–593Link, Google Scholar
• Markowitz H. M. Portfolio selection. J. Finance (1952) 7:77–91Google Scholar
• Rockafellar R. T., Uryasev S. Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk (2000) 2(3):21–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rockafellar R. T., Uryasev S. Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J. Banking Finance (2002) 26(7):1443–1471Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schönbucher P. Factor models for portfolio credit risk. (2000) . Working paper, University of Bonn, Germany. http://www.gloriamundi.orgGoogle Scholar
• Yamai Y., Yoshiba T. On the validity of value-at-risk: Comparative analyses with expected shortfall. Monetary Econom. Stud. (2002) 20(1):57–85Google Scholar