A Queueing Analysis to Determine How Many Additional Beds Are Needed for the Detention and Removal of Illegal Aliens

References

• Bean F. D., de la Garza R. O., Roberts B. R., Weintraub S.At the Crossroads: Mexican Migration and U.S. Policy (1997) (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, MD) Google Scholar
• Bjerke J. Personal communication. (2004) . Statistician, office of detention and removal, bureau of immigration and customs enforcement. (December)Google Scholar
• Bush G. W. Bush on immigration: Excerpts from Bush's address on allowing immigrants to fill some jobs. New York Times (2004) January 8):A28Google Scholar
• Callahan R. Statement before the House Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims. (2005) . (March 10)Google Scholar
• Cinlar E., Lewis P. A. W. Superposition of point processes. Stochastic Point Processes, Statistical Analysis, Theory and Applications (1972) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) 549–606Google Scholar
• Dougherty M., Wilson D., Wu A. Immigration enforcement actions: 2004. (2005) . Report, Office of Immigration Statistics, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
• Eggen D. Immigration backlog forces justice to shift staffing. Washington Post (2004) December 14):A11Google Scholar
• Eick S. G., Massey W. A., Whitt W. Mt/G/∞ queues with sinusoidal arrival rates. Management Sci. (1993) 39:241–252Link, Google Scholar
• Espenshade T. J., Acevedo D. Migrant cohort size, enforcement effort, and the apprehension of undocumented aliens. Population Res. Policy Rev. (1995) 14:145–172Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feller W.An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications (1968) 13rd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Fischer M. J. Priority loss systems—Unequal holding times. Amer. Inst. Indust. Engineers Trans. (1980) 12:47–53Google Scholar
• Garcia M. J. FY 2005 budget request for the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (2004) . Statement before the Senate Appropriations Committee Subcommittee on Homeland SecurityGoogle Scholar
• Green L., Kolesar P. The pointwise stationary approximation for queues with nonstationary arrivals. Management Sci. (1991) 37:84–97Link, Google Scholar
• Hutchinson A. U.S. Department of Homeland Security “detention priorities”. (2004) . Memorandum by Under Secretary for Border and Transportation Security, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, D.C. (October 18). Retrieved on January 14, 2005, http://www.vdare.com/mann/detention_priorities.htmGoogle Scholar
• Jehl D. U.S. aides cite worry on Qaeda infiltration from Mexico. New York Times (2005) February 17):A10Google Scholar
• Kelly F. P.Reversibility and Stochastic Networks (1979) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Kolesar P., Green L. Insights on service system design from a normal approximation to Erlang's delay formula. Production Oper. Management (1998) 7:282–293Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laws C. N. Resource pooling in queueing networks with dynamic routing. Adv. Appl. Probab. (1992) 24:699–726Crossref, Google Scholar
• LeDuff C., Flores J. E. The everymigrant's guide to crossing the border illegally. New York Times (2005) February 9):A16Google Scholar
• Lipton E. The President's budget: Homeland security; more money for border activities. New York Times (2006a) February 7):A14Google Scholar
• Lipton E. Setbacks stymie bid to stockpile bioterror drugs. New York Times (2006b) September 18):A1Google Scholar
• Little J. D. C. A proof for the queuing formula L = λ W. Oper. Res. (1961) 9:383–387Link, Google Scholar
• Massey W. A., Whitt W. An analysis of the modified-offered-load approximation for the nonstationary Erlang loss model. Ann. Appl. Probab. (1994) 4:1145–1160Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKinley J. C. Tougher tactics deter migrants at U.S. border. New York Times (2007) February 21):A1Google Scholar
• Office of Immigration Statistics 2003 Yearbook of immigration statistics. (2004) . Chap. 8. (September)Google Scholar
• Office of Immigration Statistics 2005 Yearbook of immigration statistics. (2006) . (September)Google Scholar
• One Hundred Eighth U.S. Congress Intelligence reform and terrorism prevention act of 2004. (2004) December 17):108–458Pub. L.Google Scholar
• Ramanathan S. Personal communication. (2005) . Counsel and professional staff member, house select committee on homeland security. (May)Google Scholar
• Swarns R. L. Tight immigration policy hits roadblock of reality. New York Times (2006) January 20):A12Google Scholar
• Tangeman A. S. Endgame: Office of detention and removal strategic plan, 2003–2012. (2003) . Report, Office of Detention and Removal, Washington, D.C. (August 15)Google Scholar
• Turner J. Transforming the southern border: Providing security and prosperity in the post-9/11 world. (2004) . Report, House Select Committee on Homeland Security, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
• U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom Report on asylum seekers in expedited removal. Vol. I: Findings and recommendations. (2005) . U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, Washington, D.C. (February 8)Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Homeland Security Budget-in-brief, fiscal year 2006. (2005) . U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Justice Immigration and Naturalization Service institutional removal program. (2002) . Report 02-41, Office of the Inspector General, Washington, D.C. (September)Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Justice The Immigration and Naturalization Service's removal of aliens issued final orders. (2003) . Report I-2003-004, Office of the Inspector General, Washington, D.C. (February)Google Scholar
• U.S. Supreme Court. Opinion Zadvydas vs. Davis. (99-7791). (2001) June 28)). Retrieved on January 18, 2005, http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-7791.ZO.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Wein L. M., Liu Y., Motskin A.Analyzing the Homeland Security of the U.S.–Mexico Border (2007) (Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar