Mean Variance Vulnerability

References

• Allingham M. Existence theorems in the capital asset pricing model. Econometrica (1991) 59:1169–1174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow K., Enthoven A. Quasiconcave programming. Econometrica (1961) 29:779–800Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell D. E. One switch utility functions and a measure of risk. Management Sci. (1988) 34:1416–1424Link, Google Scholar
• Chamberlain G. A characterization of the distributions that imply mean-variance utility functions. J. Econom. Theory (1983) 29:185–201Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chipman J. S. The ordering of portfolios in terms of mean and variance. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1973) 40:167–190Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eeckhoudt L., Gollier C., Schlesinger H. Changes in background risk and risk taking behaviour. Econometrica (1996) 64:683–690Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eichner T. Comparative statics of properness in two-moment decision models. Econom. Theory (2005) 25:1007–1012Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eichner T., Wagener A. Variance vulnerability, background risk, and mean variance preferences. Geneva Papers Risk Insurance Theory (2003) 28:173–184Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farquhar P. H., Nakamura Y. Constant exchange risk properties. Oper. Res. (1987) 35:206–214Link, Google Scholar
• Fishburn P. C., Porter R. B. Optimal portfolios with one safe and one risky asset: Effects of changes in rate of return and risk. Management Sci. (1976) 22:1064–1073Link, Google Scholar
• Gollier C., Pratt J. W. Risk vulnerability and the tempering effect of background risk. Econometrica (1996) 64:1109–1123Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kimball M. Precautionary saving in the small and in the large. Econometrica (1990) 58:53–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kimball M. Standard risk aversion. Econometrica (1993) 61:589–611Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lajeri-Chaherli F. More on properness: The case of mean-variance preferences. Geneva Papers Risk Insurance Theory (2002) 27:49–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lajeri-Chaherli F. Partial derivatives, comparative risk behavior and concavity of utility functions. Math. Soc. Sci. (2003) 46:81–99Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lajeri-Chaherli F. Proper and standard risk aversion in two-moment decision models. Theory Decision (2005) 57:213–225Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lajeri F., Nielsen L. T. Parametric characterizations of risk aversion and prudence. Econom. Theory (2000) 15:469–476Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer J. Two-moment decision models and expected utility maximization. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1987) 77:421–430Google Scholar
• Nielsen L. T. Equilibrium in CAPM without a riskless asset. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1990) 57:315–324Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ormiston M. B., Schlee E. Mean-variance preferences and investor behavior. Econom. J. (2001) 111:849–861Google Scholar
• Owen J., Rabinovitch R. On the class of elliptical distributions and their applications to the theory of portfolio choice. J. Finance (1983) 38:745–752Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt J. W., Zeckhauser R. J. Proper risk aversion. Econometrica (1987) 55:143–154Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sinn H.-W.Economic Decisions Under Uncertainty (1983) (North-Holland, Amsterdam) Google Scholar
• Tobin J. Liquidity preference as behaviour towards risk. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1958) 67:65–86Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagener A. Prudence and risk vulnerability in two-moment decision models. Econom. Lett. (2002) 74:229–235Crossref, Google Scholar