Interior Additivity and Subjective Probability Assessment of Continuous Variables

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0790

References

  • Abramson B., Brown J., Edwards W., Murphy A. H., Winkler R. L. Hailfinder: A Bayesian system for forecasting severe weather. Internat. J. Forecasting (1996) 12:57–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bearden J. N., Wallsten T. S., Fox C. R. Contrasting stochastic and support theory accounts of subadditivity. J. Math. Psych. (2007) 51:229–241CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brenner L. A., Koehler D. J. Subjective probability of disjunctive hypotheses: Local-weight models for decomposition of evidential support. Cognitive Psych. (1999) 38:16–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brenner L. A., Rottenstreich Y. Focus, repacking, and the judgment of grouped hypotheses. J. Behavioral Decision Making (1999) 12:141–148CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooke R. M.Experts in Uncertainty: Opinions and Subjective Probability in Science (1991) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dougherty M. R. P., Hunter J. Probability judgment and subadditivity: The role of working memory capacity and constraining retrieval. Memory and Cognition (2003) 31:968–982CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erev I., Wallsten T. S., Budescu D. V. Simultaneous over- and underconfidence: The role of error in judgment processes. Psych. Rev. (1994) 98:506–528Google Scholar
  • Fischhoff B., Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. Debiasing. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 422–444CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischhoff B., Slovic P., Lichtenstein S. Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception Performance (1978) 4:330–344CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fox C. R. Strength of evidence, judged probability, and choice under uncertainty. Cognitive Psych. (1999) 38:167–189CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fox C. R., Clemen R. T. Subjective probability assessment in decision analysis: Partition dependence and bias toward the ignorance prior. Management Sci. (2005) 51:1417–1432LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fox C. R., Rottenstreich Y. Partition priming in judgment under uncertainty. Psych. Sci. (2003) 14:195–200CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fox C. R., Tversky A. A belief-based account of decision under uncertainty. Management Sci. (1998) 44:879–895LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fox C. R., Rogers B. A., Tversky A. Options traders exhibit subadditive decision weights. J. Risk Uncertainty (1996) 1:5–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilovich T., Griffin D., Kahneman D.Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (2002) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckerman D., Horvitz E., Nathwani B. Toward normative expert systems: Part I. The Pathfinder project. Methods Inform. Medicine (1992) 31:90–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Juslin P., Olsson H., Björkman M. Brunswikian and Thurstonian origins of bias in probability assessment: On the interpretation of stochastic components of judgment. J. Behavioral Decision Making (1997) 10:189–209CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A.Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney R., von Winterfeldt D. Eliciting probabilities from experts in complex technical problems. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1991) 38:191–201CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lindley D., Tversky A., Brown R. On the reconciliation of probability assessments. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A (1979) 142(Part 2):146–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Macchi L., Osherson D., Krantz D. H. A note on superadditive probability judgment. Psych. Rev. (1999) 106:210–214CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McClelland A. G. R., Bolger F., Wright G., Ayton P. The calibration of subjective probabilities: Theories and models 1980–94. Subjective Probability (1994) (Wiley, New York) 453–482Google Scholar
  • Merkhofer M. W. Quantifying judgmental uncertainty: Methodology, experiences, and insights. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics (1987) 17:741–752CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan M., Henrion M.Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Management (1990) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Osherson D., Shafir E., Krantz D. H., Smith E. E. Probability bootstrapping: Improving prediction by fitting extensional models to knowledgeable but incoherent probability judgments. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1997) 69:1–8CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ravinder H. V., Kleinmuntz D. N., Dyer J. S. The reliability of subjective probabilities obtained through decomposition. Management Sci. (1988) 34:186–199LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rottenstreich Y., Tversky A. Unpacking, repacking, and anchoring: Advances in support theory. Psych. Rev. (1997) 104:406–415CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Russo J. E., Kolzow K. J. Where is the fault in fault trees? J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception Performance (1994) 20:17–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Savage L. J. The elicitation of personal probabilities and expectations. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1971) 66:783–801CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schervish M. J. A general method for comparing probability assessors. Ann. Statist. (1989) 17:1856–1879CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • See K. E., Fox C. R., Rottenstreich Y. Between ignorance and truth: Partition dependence and learning in judgment under uncertainty. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition (2006) 32:1385–1402CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sloman S., Rottenstreich Y., Wisniewski E., Hadjichristidis C., Fox C. R. Typical versus atypical unpacking and superadditive probability judgment. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition (2004) 30:573–582CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spetzler C. S., Staël Von Holstein C.-A. Probability encoding in decision analysis. Management Sci. (1975) 22:340–352LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A., Fox C. R. Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psych. Rev. (1995) 102:269–283CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A., Koehler D. J. Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. Psych. Rev. (1994) 101:547–567CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winkler R. L. Scoring rules and the evaluation of probabilities. Test (1996) 5:1–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu G., Gonzalez R. Nonlinear decision weights in choice under uncertainty. Management Sci. (1999) 45:74–85LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.