Does Component Sharing Help or Hurt Reliability? An Empirical Study in the Automotive Industry

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0791

References

  • Adler P. Shared learning. Management Sci. (1990) 36(8):938–958LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Allison P. D.Survival Analysis Using SAS: A Practical Guide (1995) (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) Google Scholar
  • Anzoni Y., Simon H. A. The theory of learning by doing. Psych. Rev. (1979) 86:124–140CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L.Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and transferring Knowledge (1999) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) Google Scholar
  • Baloff N. The extension of the learning curve. Oper. Res. Quart. (1971) 22:329–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benkard C. L. Learning and forgetting: The dynamics of aircraft production. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 90(4):1034–1054CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carley L. Big three brake symposium. Tech update. Brake and Front End (2002) NovemberGoogle Scholar
  • Cox D. R. Regression models and life tables. J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Ser B. (1972) 34(2):187–220Google Scholar
  • Dasgupta A., Pecht M. Material failure mechanisms and damage models. IEEE Trans. Reliability (1991) 40(5):531–536CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Desai P., Kekre S., Radhakrishnan S., Srinivasan K. Product differentiation and commonality in design: Balancing revenue and cost drivers. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):37–51LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dick A. R. Learning by doing and dumping in the semiconductor industry. J. Law Econom. (1991) 34:662–669CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fine C. Quality improvement and learning in productive systems. Management Sci. (1986) 32(10):1301–1315LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher M. L., Ramdas K., Ulrich K. T. Component sharing in the management of product variety: A study of automotive braking systems. Management Sci. (1999) 45(5):297–315LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta S., Krishnan V. A product family-based approach for integrated component and supplier selection. Production Oper. Management (1999) 8(2):163–182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hatch N. W., Mowery D. C. Process innovation and learning by doing in semiconductor manufacturing. Management Sci. (1998) 44(11):1461–1477LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Heese H. S., Swaminathan J. M. Product line design with component commonality and cost-reduction effort. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2006) 8(2):206–219LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Helsen K., Schmittlein D. C. Analyzing duration times in marketing: Evidence for the effectiveness of hazard rate models. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(4):395–414LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ittner C. Exploratory evidence on the behavior of quality costs. Oper. Res. (1996) 44(1):114–130LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kececioglu D.Reliability Engineering Handbook (1991) 1(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Kim K., Chhajed D. An experimental investigation of valuation change due to commonality in vertical product line extension. J. Product Innovation Management (2001) 18(4):219–230CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krishnan V., Gupta S. Appropriateness and impact of platform-based product development. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):52–68LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lapré M. A., Tsikriktsis N. Organizational learning curves for customer dissatisfaction: Heterogeneity across airlines. Management Sci. (2006) 52(3):352–366LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lapré M. A., Van Wassenhove L. N. Creating and transferring knowledge for productivity improvement in factories. Management Sci. (2001) 47(10):1311–1325LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lieberman M. The learning curve and pricing in the chemical processing industries. RAND J. Econom. (1984) 15:213–228CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacDuffie J. P., Sethuraman K., Fisher M. Product variety and manufacturing performance: Evidence from the international automotive assembly plant study. Management Sci. (1996) 42(3):350–369LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Macher J. T. Vertical disintegration and process innovation in semiconductor manufacturing: Foundries vs. integrated producers. (2003) . Working paper, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  • Mukherjee A. S., Lapré M. A., Van Wassenhove L. N. Knowledge driven quality improvement. Management Sci. (1998) 44(11):S35–S59LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ramdas K. Managing product variety: An integrative review and research directions. Production Oper. Management (2003) 12(1):79–101CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ramdas K., Sawhney M. A cross-functional approach to designing multiple line extensions for assembled products. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):22–36LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ramdas K., Fisher M. L., Ulrich K. T. Managing variety for assembled products: Modeling component systems sharing. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2003) 5(2):142–156LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., Argote L., Brooks D. Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Sci. (2005) 51(6):869–881LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rutenberg D. P. Design commonality to reduce multi-item inventory: Optimal depth of a product line. Oper. Res. (1971) 19(2):491–509LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schoonhoven C. B. Problems with contingency theory: Testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26(3):349–377CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swaminathan J., Tayur S. Managing broader product lines through delayed differentiation using vanilla boxes. Management Sci. (1998) 44(12):S161–S172LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thonemann U. W., Brandeau M. L. Optimal commonality in component design. Oper. Res. (2000) 48(1):1–19LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ulrich K. T. The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy (1995) 24(3):419–440CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ulrich K. T., Ellison D. J. Holistic customer requirements and the design-select decision. Management Sci. (1999) 45(5):641–658LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wong K. L. A new framework for part failure-rate prediction models. IEEE Trans. Reliability (1995) 44(1):139–146CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wright T. Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. J. Aeronautical Sci. (1936) 3(4):122–128CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang K., Kapur K. C. Customer driven reliability: Integration of QFD and robust design. IEEE Annual Reliability Maintainability Sympos. Proc. (1997) Philadelphia:339–344CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yano C. A., Dobson G., Ho T. H., Tang C. S. Profit optimizing product line design, selection and pricing with manufacturing cost consideration. Product Variety Management: Research Advances (1998) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston/Dordrecht/London) 145–176CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.