Competition and Cooperation in Decentralized Push and Pull Assembly Systems

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0792

References

  • Baye M. R., Crocker K. J., Ju J. Divisionalization, franchising, and divestiture incentives in oligopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1996) 86(1):223–236Google Scholar
  • Bernstein F., DeCroix G. Decentralized pricing and capacity decisions in a multitier system with modular assembly. Management Sci. (2004) 50(9):1293–1309LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein F., DeCroix G. Inventory policies for a decentralized assembly system. Oper. Res. (2006) 54(2):324–336LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein F., DeCroix G., Wang Y. Incentives and commonality in a decentralized multiproduct assembly system. Oper. Res. (2007) 55(4):630–646LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brueckner J. K., Whalen W. T. The price effects of international airline alliances. J. Law Econom. (2000) 43(2):503–545CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G. The allocation of inventory risk in a supply chain: Push, pull, and advance-purchase discount contracts. Management Sci. (2004) 50(2):222–238LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G., Lariviere M. Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: Strengths and limitations. Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):30–44LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cheng F., Ettl M., Lu Y., Yao D. D. A two-stage push-pull production planning model. (2005) . Working paper, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NYGoogle Scholar
  • Chwe M. S. Farsighted coalitional stability. J. Econom. Theory (1994) 63:299–325CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cournot A.Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth (1929) (Macmillan, New York) . Original published in French (1838), translated by Nathaniel BaconGoogle Scholar
  • Depoorter B., Parisi F. Fair use and copyright protection: A price theory explanation. Internat. Rev. Law Econom. (2002) 21:453–473CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Economides N., Salop S. Competition and integration among complements, and network market structure. J. Indust. Econom. (1992) 40(1):105–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eggleston K., Norman G., Pepall L. M. Pricing coordination failures and health care provider integration. Contributions Econom. Anal. Policy (2004) 3(1). Article 20Google Scholar
  • Feng T., Zhang F. Centralization of suppliers: The impact of modular assembly on supply chain efficiency. (2005) . Working paper, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Gerchak Y., Wang Y. Revenue-sharing vs. wholesale-price contracts in assembly systems with random demand. Production Oper. Management (2004) 13(1):23–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granot D., Sošić G. Formation of alliances in internet-based supply exchanges. Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):92–105LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang L., Wang Y. Channel structure and performance for complementary products with price-sensitive and uncertain demand. (2005) . Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
  • Lariviere M. A., Tayur S., Ganeshan R., Magazine M. Supply chain contracting and coordination with stochastic demand. Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management (1999) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) 233–268Chap. 8CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lariviere M. A., Porteus E. Selling to the newsvendor: An analysis of price-only contracts. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2001) 3(4):293–305LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liebowitz S. Economist predicts Microsoft breakup would harm consumers and software developers. Tech. Law J. (2000a) February 27Google Scholar
  • Liebowitz S. Economist estimates that court ordered Microsoft breakup would cost U.S. consumers $50 billion. Tech. Law J. (2000b) September 25Google Scholar
  • Mauleon A., Vannetelbosch V. Farsightedness and cautiousness in coalition formation games with positive spillovers. Theory Decision (2004) 56(3):291–324CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCracken J. Ford gets cut off by a top supplier as detroit squeezes parts makers. Wall Street Journal (2006) October 18Google Scholar
  • Nagarajan M., Bassok Y. A bargaining framework in supply chains. Management Sci. (2008) . ForthcomingLinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nagarajan M., Sošić G. Stable farsighted coalitions in competitive markets. Management Sci. (2007) 53(1):29–45LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Netessine S., Zhang F. Positive vs. negative externalities in inventory management: Implications for supply chain design. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2005) 7(1):58–73LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sošić G. Transshipment of inventories among retailers: Myopic vs. farsighted stability. Management Sci. (2006) 52(10):1493–1508LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Spengler J. Vertical integration and antitrust policy. Political Econom. (1950) 58:347–352CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Varian H. R. High-technology industries and market structure. Proc. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (2001) 65–101Google Scholar
  • Wang Y. Joint pricing-production decisions in supply chains of complementary products with uncertain demand. Oper. Res. (2006) 54(6):1110–1127LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang Y., Gerchak Y. Capacity games in assembly systems under uncertain demand. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2003) 5(3):252–267LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.