A Dynamic Competitive Forecasting Model Incorporating Dyadic Decision Making

References

• Aikin K. J., Swasy J. L., Braman A. C. Patient and physician attitudes and behaviors associated with DTC promotion of prescription drugs—Summary of FDA survey research results. (2004) . Report, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, FDA, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
• Bates D. M., Watts D. G.Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Applications (1988) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P. K., Jain D. C., Vilcassim N. J. Investigating heterogeneity in brand preferences in logit models for panel data. J. Marketing Res. (1991) 28(4):417–428Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper L. G., Eliashberg J., Lilien G. L. Market share models. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science (1993) (Elsevier, New York) 259–314Google Scholar
• Corfman K. P., Gupta S., Eliashberg J., Lilien G. L. Mathematical models of group choice and negotiations. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science (1993) (Elsevier, New York) 83–142Google Scholar
• Curry D. J., Menasco M. B., Van Ark J. W. Multiattribute dyadic choice: Models and tests. J. Marketing Res. (1991) 28(3):259–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. S., Sarin R. K. Measurable multiattribute value functions. Oper. Res. (1979) 27(4):810–822Link, Google Scholar
• Eliashberg J., Winkler R. L. Risk sharing and group decision-making. Management Sci. (1981) 27(11):1221–1235Link, Google Scholar
• Gatignon H., Weitz B., Bansal P. Brand introduction strategies and competitive environments. J. Marketing Res. (1990) 27(4):390–401Crossref, Google Scholar
• Givon M. U. Variety seeking through brand switching. Marketing Sci. (1984) 3(1):1–22Link, Google Scholar
• Gliebe J. P., Koppelman F. S. A model of joint activity participation between household members. Transportation (2002) 29(1):49–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gliebe J. P., Koppelman F. S. Modeling household activity-travel interactions as parallel constrained choices. Transportation (2005) 32(5):449–471Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grimmett G. R., Stirzaker D. R.Probability and Random Processes (1992) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Hahn M., Park S., Krishnamurthi L., Zoltners A. A. Analysis of new product diffusion using a four-segment trial-repeat model. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13(3):224–247Link, Google Scholar
• Harsanyi J. C. Cardinal welfare, individual ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility theory. J. Political Econom. (1955) 63:309–321Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser R. J., Wisniewski K. J. Dynamic analysis of consumer response to marketing strategies. Management Sci. (1982) 28(5):455–486Link, Google Scholar
• Kahn B. E., Kalwani M. U., Morrison D. G. Measuring variety-seeking and reinforcement behavior using panel data. J. Marketing Res. (1986a) 23(2):89–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahn B. E., Morrison D. G., Wright G. P. Aggregating individual purchases to the household level. Marketing Sci. (1986b) 5(3):260–268Link, Google Scholar
• Keeney R. L., Raiffa H.Decisions with Multiple Objectives (1976) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Kimball G. E. Some industrial applications of military operations research methods. Oper. Res. (1957) 5(2):201–204Link, Google Scholar
• Kirkwood C. W., Sarin R. K. Preference conditions for multiattribute value functions. Oper. Res. (1980) 28(1):225–232Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnan T. V., Bass F. M., Kumar V. Impact of a late entrant on the diffusion of a new product/service. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(2):269–278Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lilien G. L., Rao A. G., Kalish S. Bayesian estimation and control of detailing effort in a repeat purchase diffusion environment. Management Sci. (1981) 27(5):493–506Link, Google Scholar
• Mahajan V., Wind Y., Sharma S. An approach to repeat purchase diffusion models. Proc. Amer. Marketing Educator's Conf., Amer. Marketing Association (1983) Chicago:442–446Google Scholar
• McFadden D., Manski C. F., McFadden D. Econometric models of probabilistic choice. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications (1981) (MIT, Cambridge, MA) 198–272Google Scholar
• McGuire T. W., Staelin R. An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(2):161–191Link, Google Scholar
• O'Connell V. Patients' success in drug requests shows the power of medication ads. Wall Street Journal (2002) April 15Google Scholar
• Ofek E., Srinivasan V. How much does the market value an improvement in a product attribute? Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(4):398–411Link, Google Scholar
• Pakes A. Patents as options: Some estimates of the value of holding European patent stocks. Econometrica (1986) 54(4):755–784Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker P., Gatignon H. Specifying competitive effects in diffusion models: An empirical analysis. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1994) 11(1):17–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker P., Gatignon H. Order of entry, trial diffusion, and elasticity dynamics: An empirical case. Marketing Lett. (1996) 7(1):95–109Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petrin A. Quantifying the benefits of new products: The case of the minivan. J. Political Econom. (2002) 110(4):705–729Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao A. G., Yamada M. Forecasting with a repeat purchase diffusion model. Management Sci. (1988) 34(6):734–752Link, Google Scholar
• Seber G. A. F., Wild C. J.Nonlinear Regression (1989) (Wiley, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shankar V. New product introduction and incumbent response strategies: Their interrelationship and the role of multimarket contact. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(3):327–344Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shankar V., Carpenter G. S., Krishnamurthi L. Late mover advantage: How innovative late entrants outsell pioneers. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(1):54–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shankar V., Carpenter G., Krishnamurthi L. The advantages of entering in the growth stage of the product life cycle: An empirical analysis. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(2):269–276Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song I., Chintagunta P. K. A micromodel of new product adoption with heterogeneous and forward-looking consumers: Application to the digital camera category. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2003) 1:371–407Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sudhir K. Competitive pricing behavior in the auto market. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(1):42–60Link, Google Scholar
• Sultan F., Farley J. U., Lehmann D. R. A meta-analysis of applications of diffusion models. J. Marketing Res. (1990) 27(1):70–77Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zufryden F. Multibrand transition probabilities as a function of explanatory variables: Estimation by a least-squares-based approach. J. Marketing Res. (1986) 23(2):177–183Crossref, Google Scholar