The Effect of Product Introduction Delays on Operating Performance

References

• Ahmed A. S. Accounting earnings and future economic rents. J. Accounting Econom. (1994) 17:377–400Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barber B. M., Lyon J. D. Detecting abnormal operating performance: The empirical power and specification of test statistics. J. Financial Econom. (1996) 41:359–399Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayus B. L. Speed to market and new product performance trade-offs. J. Product Innovation Management (1997) 14:485–497Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayus B. L., Jain S., Rao A. G. Truth or consequences: An analysis of vaporware and new product announcements. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38:3–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya S., Krishnan V., Mahajan V. Managing new product definitions in highly dynamic environments. Management Sci. (1998) 44:S50–S64Link, Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20:347–378Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen S. S., Chung T. Y., Ho K. W., Lee C. F. Intra-industry effects of delayed new product introductions. (2003) . Working paper, College of Management, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan, TaiwanGoogle Scholar
• Clark K. B., Fujimoto T.Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Cohen M. A., Eliashburg J., Ho T. H. New product development: The performance and time-to-market tradeoff. Management Sci. (1996) 42:17–186Link, Google Scholar
• Cooper R. G., Kleinschmidt E. J. New products: What separates winners from losers? J. Product Innovation Management (1987) 4:169–184Crossref, Google Scholar
• Datar S., Jordan C. C., Kekre S., Rajiv S., Srinivasan K. Advantages of time-based new product development in fast-cycle industry. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 36:36–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama E. F., French K. Size and book-to-market factors in earnings and returns. J. Finance (1995) 50:131–155Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaimon C., Morton A. Investment in facility changeover flexibility for early entry into high-tech markets. Production Oper. Management (2005) 14:159–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Girotra K., Terwiesch C., Ulrich K. T. Valuing R&D projects in a portfolio: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Management Sci. (2007) 53:1452–1466Link, Google Scholar
• Griffin A. The effect of project and process characteristics on product development cycle time. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 36:24–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendricks K. B., Singhal V. R. Delays in new product introductions and the market value of the firm: The consequences of being late to the market. Management Sci. (1997) 43:422–436Link, Google Scholar
• Hendricks K. B., Singhal V. R. An empirical analysis of the effect of supply chain disruptions on long-run stock price performance and risk of the firm. Production Oper. Management (2005) 14:35–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ittner C. D., Larcker D. F. Product development cycle time and organizational performance. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 36:13–23Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarrell G., Peltzman S. The impact of product recalls on the wealth of sellers. J. Political Econom. (1985) 93:512–536Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V., Ulrich K. T. Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Sci. (2001) 47:1–21Link, Google Scholar
• McGahan A. M., Porter M. E. How much does industry matter really? Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:15–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer M. H., Utterback J. M. Product development cycle time and commercial success. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1995) 42:297–304Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penman S. An evaluation of the accounting rate of return. J. Accounting, Auditing, Finance (1991) 6:233–255Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shane S. A., Ulrich K. T. Technology innovation, product development, and entrepreneurship in Management Science. Management Sci. (2004) 50(2):133–144Link, Google Scholar
• Sharma A., Lacey N. Linking product development outcomes to market valuation of the firm: The case of the US pharmaceutical industry. J. Product Innovation Management (2004) 21:297–308Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C., Loch C., Niederkofler M. When product development performance makes a difference: A statistical analysis in the electronic industry. J. Product Innovation Management (1998) 15:3–15Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ulrich K. T., Eppinger S. D.Product Design and Development (2004) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar