The Impact of Simulation Training on Call Center Agent Performance: A Field-Based Investigation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0818

References

  • Anderson J. R.The Architecture of Cognition (1983) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Anderson J. R.Learning and Memory: An Integrated Approach (1995) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Anderson J. R., Bower G. H.Human Associative Memory (1973) (Winston and Sons, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
  • Arthur W., Bennett W., Stanush P. L., McNelly T. L. Factors that influence skill decay and retention: A quantitative review and analysis. Human Performance (1998) 11(1):57–101CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashford S. J., Northcraft G. B. Conveying more (or less) than we realize: The role of impression management in feedback-seeking. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1992) 53(3):310–334CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker W. Simulation training: The power of continuous performance optimization. Customer Inter@ction Solutions (2005) 23(12):56–59Google Scholar
  • Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psych. Rev. (1977) 84(2):191–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A.Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory (1986) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Bolt M. A., Killough L. N., Koh H. C. Testing the interaction effects of task complexity in computer training using the social cognitive model. Decision Sci. (2001) 32(1):1–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell D. J. Task complexity: A review and analysis. Acad. Management Rev. (1988) 13(1):40–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Compeau D. R., Higgins C. A. Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6(2):118–143LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cook T. D., Campbell D. T.Quasi-Experimentation: Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings (1979) (Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston) Google Scholar
  • Craik F. I. M., Lockhart R. S. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. (1972) 11(6):671–684CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. D., Yi M. Y. Improving computer skill training: Behavior modeling, symbolic mental rehearsal, and the role of knowledge structures. J. Appl. Psych. (2004) 89(3):509–523CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Croon E. M., Sluiter J. K., Blonk R. W., Broersen J. P., Frings-Dresen M. H. Stressful work, psychological job strain, and turnover: A 2-year prospective cohort study of truck drivers. J. Appl. Psych. (2004) 89(3):442–454CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Decker P. J., Nathan B. R.Behavior Modeling Training: Principles and Applications (1985) (Praeger, New York) Google Scholar
  • Eich E. Context, memory, and integrated item/context imagery. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn. Memory, and Cognition (1985) 11:764–770CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleischer J. More than lip service. Call Center Magazine (2003) 16(3):42–54Google Scholar
  • Gattiker U. E. Computer skills acquisition: A review and future directions for research. J. Management (1992) 18(3):547–574CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldstein A. P., Sorcher M. S.Changing Supervisory Behavior (1974) (Pergamon Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Goldstein I. L.Training in Organizations: Needs Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (1993) 3rd ed.(Brooks Cole, Pacific Grove, CA) Google Scholar
  • Hays W. L.Statistics (1988) 4th ed.(Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hirsch C. R. The effects of guided discovery and individualized instructional packages on initial learning, transfer, and retention. J. Res. Math. Ed. (1977) 8:359–368CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Howell W. C., Cooke N. J., Goldstein and Associates I. L. Training the human information processor: A look at cognitive models. Training and Development in Organizations (1989) (Jossey Bass, San Francisco) 121–182Google Scholar
  • Johnson R. D., Marakas G. M. The role of behavioral modeling in computer skills acquisition: Toward refinement of the model. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(4):402–417LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kohli A. K., Shervani T. A., Challagalla G. N. Learning and performance orientation of salespeople: The role of supervisors. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(2):263–274CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kraiger K., Ford J. K., Salas E. Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. J. Appl. Psych. (1993) 78(2):311–328CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levy P. E., Albright M. D., Cawley B. D., Williams J. R. Situational and individual determinants of feedback seeking: A closer look at the process. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1995) 62(1):23–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J., Simon H.Organizations (1958) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Markels A. Please hold…forever. U.S. News & World Report. (2003) August 18):34–35Google Scholar
  • May G. L., Kahnweiler W. M. The effect of a mastery practice design on learning and transfer in behavior modeling training. Personnel Psych. (2000) 53(2):353–373CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nunnally J. C.Psychometric Theory (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Parasuraman A. Technology readiness index [TRI]: A multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. J. Service Res. (2000) 2(4):307–321CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robertson I. T. Behaviour modelling: Its record and potential in training and development. British J. Management (1990) 1(1):117–125CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rouse W. B., Morris N. M. On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psych. Bull. (1986) 100(3):349–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schroder H. M., Driver J. J., Streufert S.Human Information Processing (1967) (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York) Google Scholar
  • Simon S. J., Werner J. M. Computer training through behavior modeling, self-paced, and instructional approaches: A field experiment. J. Appl. Psych. (1996) 81(6):648–659CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon S. J., Grover G., Teng J. T., Whitcomb K. The relationship of information system training methods and cognitive ability to end user satisfaction, comprehension, and skill transfer: A longitudinal field study. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(4):466–490LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tannenbaum S. I., Yukl G. Training and development in work organizations. Annual Rev. Psych. (1992) 43:399–441CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor P. J., Russ-Eft D. F., Chan D. W. A meta-analytic review of behavior modeling training. J. Appl. Psych. (2005) 90(4):692–709CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Terborg J., Miller H. Motivation, behavior and performance: A closer examination of goal-setting and monetary incentives. J. Appl. Psych. (1978) 63(1):29–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tuten T. L., Neidermeyer P. E. Performance, satisfaction and turnover in call centers: The effects of stress and optimism. J. Bus. Res. (2004) 57(1):26–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • VandeWalle D. A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process. J. Appl. Psych. (1997) 82(3):390–400CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weiss H. M., Dunnette M. D., Hough L. M. Learning theory and industrial and organisational psychology. Handbook of Industrial and Organisational Psychology (1990) 12nd ed.(Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA) 171–222Google Scholar
  • Wexley K. N., McCellin D. G. The effects of varying training task difficulty on training transfer. 95th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association (1987) New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Wood R. E. Task complexity: Definition of the construct. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1986) 37(1):60–82CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wood R. E., Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(3):361–384CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yi M. Y., Davis F. D. Improving computer training effectiveness for decision technologies: Behavior modeling and retention enhancement. Decision Sci. (2001) 32(3):521–544CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yi M. Y., Davis F. D. Developing and validating an observational learning model of computer software training and skill acquisition. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(2):146–169LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.