Optimal Second-Stage Outsourcing

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0834

References

  • Anderson S., Glenn D., Sedatole K. Sourcing parts of complex products: Evidence on transactions costs, high-powered incentives and ex-post opportunism. Accounting, Organ. Soc. (2000) 25(8):723–749CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Armstrong J. Ford caves in on contracts; supplier group says some get a break on tough terms. Automotive News (2004) July 19):1Google Scholar
  • Armstrong J., Sherefkin R. Suppliers wary of increasing warranty charges; insurance plan offers expensive protection against chargebacks. Automotive News (2003) May 2):17Google Scholar
  • Baiman S., Fischer P., Rajan M. Information, contracting, and quality costs. Management Sci. (2000) 46(6):776–789LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baiman S., Fischer P., Rajan M. V. Performance measurement and design in supply chains. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):173–188LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Balachandran K., Radhakrishnan S. Quality implications of warranties in a supply chain. Management Sci. (2005) 51(8):1266–1277LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin C. Y., Clark K. B. Managing in an age of modularity. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) 75(5):84–93Google Scholar
  • Cooper R., Ross T. W. Product warranties and double moral hazard. RAND J. Econom. (1985) 16(1):103–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Costantino N., Pietroforte R. Subcontracting practices in USA homebuilding—An emperical verification of Eccle's findings 20 years later. Eur. J. Purchasing Supply Management (2002) 8:15–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dye R. A., Sridhar S. S. Moral hazard severity and contract design. Rand J. Econom. (2005) 36(1):78–92Google Scholar
  • Economist, The A revolution of one. The Economist (2001) April 14):63Google Scholar
  • Eppinger S., Ulrich K.Product Design and Development (2003) (McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York) Google Scholar
  • Helper S., Sako M. Determinants of trust in supplier relations: Evidence from the automotive industry in Japan and the United States. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1998) 34(3):387–417CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kisiel R. Ford wants better relations with its suppliers. Automotive News Europe (2005) October 17):22Google Scholar
  • Laffont J.-J., Martimort D.The Theory of Incentives (2002) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laux C. Limited-liability and incentive contracting with multiple projects. RAND J. Econom. (2001) 32(3):514–526CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nagar V., Rajan M. The revenue implications of financial and operational measures of product quality. Accounting Rev. (2001) 76(4):495–513CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sappington D. Limited liability contracts between principal and agent. J. Econom. Theory (1983) 29:1–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith D. C. Risks and rewards. Ward's Auto World (1997) 33(6):3Google Scholar
  • Treece J. Toyota: Modules may not be a bargain. Automotive News (1998) 77(5779):16Google Scholar
  • Wernle B. Bosch boss: Stop pointing fingers; carmakers, suppliers must share the quality burden, chairman says. Automotive News (2005) May 9):8Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.