How Do Decision Frames Influence the Stock Investment Choices of Individual Investors?

References

• Bailey T., Gatrell A.Interactive Spatial Data Analysis (1995) (Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow, Essex, England) Google Scholar
• Barber B., Odean T. Trading is hazardous to your wealth: The common stock investment performance of individual investors. J. Finance (2000) 55:773–806Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barber B., Odean T. Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Quart. J. Econom. (2001) 116:261–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N., Huang M. Mental accounting, loss aversion, and individual stock returns. J. Finance (2001) 56:1247–1292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N., Huang M. Preferences with frames: A new utility specification that allows for the framing of risks. (2007) . Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
• Barberis N., Xiong W. What drives the disposition effect? An analysis of a long-standing preference-based explanation. J. Finance (2008) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Barberis N., Huang M., Thaler R. H. Individual preferences, monetary gambles, and stock market participation: A case for narrow framing. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2006) 96:1069–1090Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benartzi S., Thaler R. H. Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quart. J. Econom. (1995) 110:73–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carhart M. M. On persistence in mutual fund performance. J. Finance (1997) 52:57–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coval J. D., Moskowitz T. J. The geography of investment: Informed trading and asset prices. J. Political Econom. (2001) 109:811–841Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhar R., Zhu N. Up close and personal: An individual level analysis of the disposition effect. Management Sci. (2006) 52:726–740Link, Google Scholar
• Fama E. F., French K. R. Common risk factors in returns on stocks and bonds. J. Financial Econom. (1993) 33:3–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feng L., Seasholes M. S. Do investor sophistication and trading experience eliminate behavioral biases in financial markets? Rev. Finance (2005) 9:305–351Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U., Kapteyn A., Potters J. Evaluation periods and asset prices in a market experiment. J. Finance (2003) 58:821–837Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goetzmann W. N., Kumar A. Equity portfolio diversification. Rev. Finance (2008) . ForthcomingCrossref, Google Scholar
• Graham J. R., Harvey C. R., Huang H. Investor competence, trading frequency, and home bias. (2006) . Working paper, Duke University, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
• Hirst E. D., Joyce E. J., Schadewald M. S. Mental accounting and outcome contiguity in consumer borrowing decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1994) 58:136–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ivković Z., Sialm C., Weisbenner S. Portfolio concentration and the performance of individual investors. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (2008) . ForthcomingCrossref, Google Scholar
• Jegadeesh N., Titman S. Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for market efficiency. J. Finance (1993) 48:65–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D. Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2003) 93:1449–1475Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Lovallo D. Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Marketing Sci. (1993) 39:17–31Abstract, Google Scholar
• Korniotis G. M., Kumar A. Does investment skill decline due to cognitive aging or improve with experience? (2007) . Working paper, McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at AustinGoogle Scholar
• Lim S. S. Do investors integrate losses and segregate gains? Mental accounting and investor trading decisions. J. Bus. (2006) 79:2539–2573Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linville P. W., Fischer G. W. Preferences for separating or combining events. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1991) 60:5–23Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller G. A. The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psych. Rev. (1956) 63:81–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Odean T. Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? J. Finance (1998) 53:1775–1798Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D., Loewenstein G. Diversification bias: Explaining the discrepancy in variety seeking between combined and separated choices. J. Experiment. Psych.: Appl. (1995) 1:34–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Read D., Loewenstein G., Rabin M. Choice bracketing. J. Risk Uncertainty (1999) 19:171–197Crossref, Google Scholar
• Redelmeier D. A., Tversky A. On the framing of multiple prospects. Psych. Sci. (1992) 3:191–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shefrin H. M., Statman M. The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long. J. Finance (1985) 40:777–790Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H. A.Models of Man: Social and Rational (1957) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Thaler R. H. Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4:199–214Link, Google Scholar
• Thaler R. H., Johnson E. J. Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Sci. (1990) 36:643–660Link, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science (1981) 211:453–458Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. J. Bus. (1986) 59:S252–S278Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu N. The local bias of individual investors. (2002) . Working paper, International Center for Finance, Yale School of Management, New Haven, CTCrossref, Google Scholar