Interactive Coordination of Objective Decompositions in Multiobjective Programming

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0848

References

  • Benson H. P., Sun E. Outcome space partition of the weight set in multiobjective linear programming. J. Optim. Theory Appl. (2000) 105(1):17–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caballero R., Gómez T., Luque M., Miguel F., Ruiz F. Hierarchical generation of Pareto optimal solutions in large-scale multiobjective systems. Comput. Oper. Res. (2002) 29(11):1537–1558CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlsson C., Fullér R. Multiple criteria decision making: The case for interdependence. Comput. Oper. Res. (1995) 22(3):251–260CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlsson C., Fullér R. Decision problems with interdependent objectives. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2000) 2(2):98–107Google Scholar
  • Chankong V., Haimes Y. Y.Multiobjective Decision Making, North-Holland Series in System Science and Engineering (1983) 8(North-Holland Publishing, New York) Google Scholar
  • Coello Coello C. A., Van Veldhuizen D. A., Lamont G. B.Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems, Genetic Algorithms and Evolutionary Computation (2002) 5(Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deb K.Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms (2001) (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK) Wiley-Interscience Series in Systems and OptimizationGoogle Scholar
  • Ehrgott M., Gandibleux X.Multiple Criteria Optimization: State of the Art Annotated Bibliographic Surveys. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science (2002) 52(Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Ehrgott M., Nickel S. On the number of criteria needed to decide Pareto optimality. Math. Methods Oper. Res. (2002) 55(3):329–345CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ehrgott M., Wiecek M. M., Figueira J., Greco S., Ehrgott M. Multiobjective programming. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science (2005) 78(Springer, New York) 667–722CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ehrgott M., Klamroth K., Schwehm C. An MCDM approach to portfolio optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2004) 155(3):752–770CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elton E. J., Gruber M. J., Brown S. J., Goetzmann W. N.Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis (2003) 6th ed.(John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Engau A., Wiecek M. M. 2D decision making in multicriteria design optimization. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. (2007a) 34(4):301–315CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Engau A., Wiecek M. M. Exact generation of epsilon-efficient solutions in multiple objective programming. OR Spectrum (2007b) 29(2):335–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Engau A., Wiecek M. M. Generating ε-efficient solutions in multiobjective programming. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2007c) 177(3):1566–1579CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fadel G. M., ul Haque I., Blouin V. Y., Wiecek M. M., Herskovits J., Mazorche S., Canelas A. Multi-criteria multi-scenario approaches in the design of vehicles. Proc. 6th World Congresses of Structural Multidisciplinary Optimization (2005) Rio de Janeiro, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  • Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) Web-Based Encyclopedia, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). (2007) . http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/Main/index.aspxGoogle Scholar
  • Figueira J., Greco S., Ehrgott M.Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys (2005) 78(Springer, New York) International Series in Operations Research & Management ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fu Y. Private communication. (2006) . Technical Expert, Optimization & Robustness, Ford Research & Advance Engineering LaboratoriesGoogle Scholar
  • Gal T., Hanne T. Consequences of dropping nonessential objectives for the application of MCDM methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1999) 119(2):244–250CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gal T., Hanne T. Nonessential objectives within network approaches for MCDM. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2006) 168(2):584–592CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gal T., Leberling H. Redundant objective functions in linear vector maximum problems and their determination. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1977) 1(3):176–184CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geoffrion A. M. Proper efficiency and the theory of vector maximization. J. Math. Anal. Appl. (1968) 22:618–630CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gómez T., González M., Luque M., Miguel F., Ruiz F. Multiple objectives decomposition-coordination methods for hierarchical organizations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2001) 133(2):323–341CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grabisch M., Lebreuche C., Figueira J., Greco S., Ehrgott M. Fuzzy measures and integrals in MCDA. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science (2005) 78(Springer, New York) 563–608CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greco S., Matarazzo B., Slowinski R., Gal T., Hanne T., Stewart T. The use of rough sets and fuzzy sets in MCDM. Multicriteria Decision Making: Advances in MCDM Models, Algorithms, Theory, and Applications (1999) 21(Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) 14-1–14-59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haimes Y. Y., Tarvainen K., Shima T., Thadathil J.Hierarchical Multiobjective Analysis of Large-Scale Systems (1990) (Hemisphere Publishing, New York) Google Scholar
  • Insurance Institute for Highway SafetyRCAR-IIWPG Seat/Head Restraint Evaluation Protocol (2006) . Research Council for Automobile Repair, International Insurance Whiplesh Prevention Group. Version 2.5 (September). http://www.iihs.org/ratings/protocols/pdf/rcar_iiwpg_protocol.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Keeney R. L., Raiffa H.Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (1976) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical StatisticsGoogle Scholar
  • Korhonen P. Interactive methods. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science (2005) 78(Springer, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazimy R. Solving multiple criteria problems by interactive decompositions. Math. Programming (1986) 35(3):334–361CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee S. M., Rho B. H. Multicriteria decomposition model for two-level, decentralized organizations. Internat. J. Policy Inform. (1985) 9(1):119–133Google Scholar
  • Lowe T. J., Thisse J.-F., Ward J. E., Wendell R. E. On efficient solutions to multiple objective mathematical programs. Management Sci. (1984) 30(11):1346–1349LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Luenberger D. G.Linear and Nonlinear Programming (1984) 2nd ed.(Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Malivert C., Boissard N. Structure of efficient sets for strictly quasi-convex objectives. J. Convex Anal. (1994) 1(2):143–150Google Scholar
  • Markowitz H. M. Portfolio selection. J. Finance (1952) 7(1):77–91Google Scholar
  • Miettinen K. Interactive nonlinear multiobjective procedures. Multiple Criteria Optimization: State of the Art Annotated Bibliographic Surveys (2002) 52(Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) 227–276International Series in Operations Research and Management ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Popovici N. Pareto reducible multicriteria optimization problems. Optimization (2005) 54(3):253–263CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roy A. D. Safety first and the holding of assets. Econometrica (1952) 20(3):431–449CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ruzika S., Wiecek M. M. Approximation methods in multiobjective programming. J. Opt. Theory Appl. (2005) 126(3):473–501CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sakawa M.Genetic Algorithms and Fuzzy Multiobjective Optimization, Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series (2002) 14(Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steuer R. E.Multiple Criteria Optimization. Theory, Computation, and Application (1986) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics: Applied Probability and StatisticsGoogle Scholar
  • Steuer R. E., Qi Y., Hirschberger M. Multiple objectives in portfolio selection. J. Financial Decision Making (2005) 1(1):11–26Google Scholar
  • Tappeta R. V., Renaud J. E. Multiobjective collaborative optimization. J. Mech. Design (1997) 119(3):403–411CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tappeta R. V., Renaud J. E., Rodriguez J. F. An interactive multiobjective optimization design strategy for decision based multidisciplinary design. Engrg. Optim. (2002) 34(5):523–544CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ward J. Structure of efficient sets for convex objectives. Math. Oper. Res. (1989) 14(2):249–257LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wiecek M. M., Blouin V. Y., Fadel G. M., Engau A., Hunt B. J., Singh V., Barichard V., Ehrgott M., Gandibleux X., T'kindt V. Multi-scenario multi-objective optimization with applications in engineering design. MOPGP'06 Post-Conference Volume. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (2006) (Springer, Berlin) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.