The Predictive Power of Three Prominent Tournament Formats

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0856

References

  • Amegashie J., Cadsby C., Song Y. Competitive burnout: Theory and experimental evidence. Games Econom. Behav. (2007) 59:213–239CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Appleton D. May the best man win? Statistician (1995) 4:529–538CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baye M., Hoppe H. The strategic equivalence of rent-seeking, innovation, and patent-race games. Games Econom. Behav. (2003) 44:217–226CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bearden J., Rapoport A., Murphy R. Sequential observation and selection with rank-dependent payoffs: An experimental study. Management Sci. (2006) 52:1437–1449LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Yashar R., Nitzan S. The optimal decision rule for fixed-size committees in dichotomous choice situations: The general result. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1997) 38:175–186CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bognanno M. Corporate tournaments. J. Labor Econom. (2001) 19:290–315CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cornes R., Hartley R. Asymmetric contests with general technologies. Econom. Theory (2005) 26:923–946CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ehrenberg R., Bognanno M. Do tournaments have incentive effects? J. Political Econom. (1990a) 98:1307–1324CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ehrenberg R., Bognanno M. The incentive effects of tournaments revisited: Evidence from the European PGA Tour. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. (1990b) 43:74S–88SCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eriksson T. Executive compensation and tournament theory: Empirical test on Danish data. J. Labor Econom. (1999) 17:262–280CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Esteban J., Ray D. Social decision rules are not immune to conflict. Econom. Governance (2001) 2:59–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferrall C., Smith A. A sequential game model of sports championship series: Theory and estimation. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1999) 81:704–719CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frick B. Contest theory and sport. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy (2003) 19:512–529CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U., Niederle M., Rustichini A. Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econom. (2003) 118:1049–1074CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gradstein M. Optimal contest design: Volume and timing of rent seeking in contests. Eur. J. Political Econom. (1998) 14:575–585CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gradstein M., Konrad K. Orchestrating rent-seeking contests. Econom. J. (1999) 109:536–545Google Scholar
  • Green J., Stokey N. A comparison of tournaments and contracts. J. Political Econom. (1983) 91:349–364CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Groh C., Moldovanu B., Sela A., Sunde U. Optimal seedings in elimination tournaments. (2006) . Working paper, University of Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  • Harary E., Moser L. The theory of round robin tournaments. Amer. Math. Monthly (1966) 73:231–246CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harbaugh R., Klumpp T. Early round upsets and championship blowouts. Econom. Inquiry (2005) 43:316–329CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison G., Carpenter J., Harrison G. W., List J. A. Field experiments and control. Field Experiments in Economics. Research in Experimental Economics (2005) 10(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 17–50Google Scholar
  • Harter H. Expected values of normal order statistics. Biometrika (1961) 48:151–165Google Scholar
  • Hertwig R., Hoffrage U., Martignon L., Gigerenzer G., Todd P. M., ABC Research Group . Quick estimation: Letting the environment do the work. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart (1999) (Oxford University Press, New York) 209–234Google Scholar
  • Horen J., Reizman R. Comparing draws for single elimination tournaments. Oper. Res. (1985) 33:249–262LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klumpp T., Polborn M. K. Primaries and the New Hampshire effect. J. Public Econom. (2006) 90:1073–1114CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knoeber C., Thurman W. Testing the theory of tournaments: An empirical analysis of broiler production. J. Labor Econom. (1994) 10:357–379Google Scholar
  • Knuth D. Random knockout tournament: Problem 86-2. SIAM Rev. (1987) 29:127–129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lai E., Matros A. Sequential contests with ability revelation. (2007) . Working paper, University of Pittsburgh, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear E. Personnel economics: Past lessons and future directions. J. Labor Econom. (1999) 17:199–236CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear E., Rosen S. Rank-order tournaments as optimal labor contracts. J. Political Econom. (1981) 89:841–864CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levin J., Nalebuff B. An introduction to vote-counting schemes. J. Econom. Perspectives (1995) 9:3–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lockard A., Tullock G.Efficient Rent-Seeking: Chronicle of an Intellectual Quagmire (2001) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGarry T., Schutz R. Efficacy of traditional sport tournament structures. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1997) 48:65–74Google Scholar
  • Moldovanu B., Sela A. The optimal allocation of prizes in contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91:542–558CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moon J., Pullman N. On generalized tournament matrices. SIAM Rev. (1970) 12:384–399CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nalebuff B., Stiglitz J. Prizes and incentives: Towards a general theory of compensation and competition. Bell J. Econom. (1983) 14:21–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Flaherty B., Siow A. Up-or-out rules in the market for lawyers. J. Labor Econom. (1995) 13:709–735CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orrison A., Schotter A., Weigelt K. Multiperson tournaments: An experimental examination. Management Sci. (2004) 50:268–279LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Prendergast C. The provision of incentives in firms. J. Econom. Literature (1999) 37:7–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reed W. The Pareto, Zipf, and other power laws. Econom. Lett. (2001) 74:15–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosen S. Prizes and incentives in elimination tournaments. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76:701–715Google Scholar
  • Rubinstein A. Ranking the participants in a tournament. SIAM J. Appl. Math. (1980) 38:108–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schotter A., Weigelt K. Asymmetric tournaments, equal-opportunity laws, and affirmative action—Some experimental results. Quart. J. Econom. (1992) 107:511–539CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Searls D. On the probability of winning with different tournament procedures. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1963) 58:1064–1081CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szymanski S. The economic design of sporting contests: A review. J. Econom. Literature (2003) 41:1137–1187CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor C. Digging for golden carrots: An analysis of research tournaments. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1995) 85:872–890Google Scholar
  • Tullock G., Buchanan J., Toltison R., Tullock G. Efficient rent seeking. Towards a Theory of Rent Seeking Society (1980) (A&M University Press, College Station, TX) 97–112Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.