Optimizing Product Line Designs: Efficient Methods and Comparisons

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0864

References

  • Aarts E., Korst J., van Laarhoven P., Aarts E., Lenstra J. K. Simulated annealing. Local Search in Combinatorial Optimization (1997) (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK) 91–120Google Scholar
  • Alexouda G., Paparrizos K. A genetic algorithm approach to the product line design problem using the seller's return criterion: An extensive comparative computational study. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2001) 134(1):165–178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balakrishnan P. V., Jacob V. S. Genetic algorithms for product design. Management Sci. (1996) 42(8):1105–1117LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Balakrishnan P. V., Gupta R., Jacob V. Development of hybrid genetic algorithms for product line designs. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics (2004) 34(1):468–483CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Belloni A., Lucena A., Resende M. G. C., de Sousa J. P. Lagrangian heuristics for the linear ordering problem. Metaheuristics: Computer Decision-Making (2004) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) 37–64Google Scholar
  • Belloni A., Sagastizábal C. Dynamic bundle methods. Math. Programming (2008) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsekas D. P.Nonlinear Programming (1999) (Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA) Google Scholar
  • Bertsimas D., Tsitsiklis J.Introduction to Linear Optimization (1997) (Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA) Google Scholar
  • Camm J. D., Cochran J. J., Curry D. J., Kannan S. Conjoint optimization: An exact branch-and-bound algorithm for the share-of-choice problem. Management Sci. (2006) 52(3):435–447LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dobson G., Kalish S. Positioning and pricing a product line. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(2):107–125LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dobson G., Kalish S. Heuristics for pricing and positioning a product line using conjoint and cost data. Management Sci. (1993) 39(2):160–175LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Green P. E., Krieger A. M. Models and heuristics for product line selection. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(1):1–19LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Green P. E., Krieger A. M., Eliashberg J., Lilien G. L. Conjoint analysis with product-positioning applications. Handbooks in Operations Research & Management Science (1993) 5(Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam) 467–515Google Scholar
  • Green P. E., Krieger A. M., Zelnio R. N. A componential segmentation model with optimal design features. Decision Sci. (1989) 20(2):221–238CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gutin G., Punnen A.The Traveling Salesman Problem and Its Variation (2002) (Kluwer Academic Publishes, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Kellerer H., Pferschy U., Pisinger D.Knapsack Problems (2004) (Springer, Berlin) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kivetz R., Netzer O., Srinivasan V. Alternative models for capturing the compromise effect. J. Marketing Res. (2004) 41(3):237–257CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kohli R., Krishnamurti R. A heuristic approach to product design. Management Sci. (1987) 33(12):1523–1533LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kohli R., Krishnamurti R. Optimal product design using conjoint analysis: Computational complexity and algorithms. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1989) 40:186–195CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kohli R., Sukumar R. Heuristics for product-line design using conjoint analysis. Management Sci. (1990) 36(12):1464–1478LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lucena A. Steiner problem in graphs: Lagrangian relaxation and cutting-planes. COAL Bull. (1992) 21:2–8Google Scholar
  • Lucena A. Tight bounds for the Steiner problem in graphs. Proc. NETFLOW93 (1993) 147–154Google Scholar
  • McBride R. D., Zufryden F. S. An integer programming approach to the optimal product line selection problem. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(2):126–140LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nair S. K., Thakur L. S., Wen K. Near optimal solutions for product line design and selection: Beam search heuristics. Management Sci. (1995) 41(5):767–785LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shi L., Olafsson S. Nested partitions method for global optimization. Oper. Res. (2000) 48(3):390–407LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shi L., Olafsson S., Chen Q. An optimization framework for product design. Management Sci. (2001) 47(12):1681–1692LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Steiner W., Hruschka H. Genetic algorithms for product design: How well do they really work? Internat. J. Market Res. (2003) 45(2):229–240CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Toubia O., Simester D. I., Hauser J. R., Dahan E. Fast polyhedral adaptive conjoint estimation. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(3):273–303LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.