Look Before You Leap: Market Opportunity Identification in Emerging Technology Firms

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0877

References

  • Abell D. F.Defining the Business: Starting Point of Strategic Planning (1980) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Armstrong J. S., Overton T. S. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. (1977) 24:396–402CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron R. A., Ensley M. D. Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns. Management Sci. (2006) 52:1331–1344LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boeker W. Strategic change: The effects of founding and history. Acad. Management J. (1989) 32:489–515CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan T. F., Trajtenberg M. General purpose technologies: “Engines of growth?”. J. Econometrics (1995) 65:83–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brews P. J., Hunt M. R. Learning to plan and planning to learn: Resolving the planning school/learning school debate. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20:889–913CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brüderl J., Preisendörfer P., Ziegler R.Der Erfolg neugegründeter Betriebe (1996) (Duncker and Humblot, Berlin) Google Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Danneels E. The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23:1095–1121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danneels E. Tight-loose coupling with customers: The enactment of customer orientation. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:559–576CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danneels E. The process of technological competence leveraging. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28:511–533CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Delmar F., Shane S. Does experience matter? The effect of founding team experience on the survival and sales of newly founded ventures. Strategic Organ. (2006) 4:215–247CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dierickx I., Cool K. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Sci. (1989) 35:1504–1511LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:179–202LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Schoonhoven C. B. Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:504–529CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L., Sorenson O. Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25:909–928CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fox J.Regression Diagnostics: An Introduction (1991) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gagné R. M., Glaser R., Gagné R. M. Foundations in learning research. Instructional Technology: Foundations (1987) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 49–84Google Scholar
  • Galunic D. C., Rodan S. Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:1193–1201CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G., Levinthal D. Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experimental search. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:113–137CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geroski P. A. Thinking creatively about markets. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1998) 16:677–695CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gifford S. Allocation of entrepreneurial attention. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1992) 19:265–284CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gifford S. Limited entrepreneurial attention and economic development. Small Bus. Econom. (1998) 10:17–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glick W. H., Huber G. P., Miller C. C., Doty D. H., Sutcliffe K. M. Studying changes in organizational design and effectiveness: Retrospective event histories and periodic assessments. Organ. Sci. (1990) 1:293–312LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W.Econometric Analysis (2003) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Greve H.Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback (2003) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gruber M., MacMillan I. C., Thompson J. D. A tale of four genes: How human capital endowments shape the identification of subjective market opportunities in technology start-ups. (2007) . Working paper CDM-EPFL & Sol C. Snider Entrepreneurial Research Center, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  • Gruber M., MacMillan I. C., Thompson J. D. The role of social capital in market opportunity identification for emerging technologies. (2008) . Working paper CDM-EPFL & Sol C. Snider Entrepreneurial Research Center, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  • Halford G., Wilson W., Guo et al. J., Gayler R. W., Wiles J., Stewart J. E. M. Connectionist implications for processing capacity limitations in analogies. Advances in Connectionist and Neural Computation Theory (1994) 2(Ablex, Norwood, NJ) 363–415Google Scholar
  • Hamilton B. H., Nickerson J. A. Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organ. (2003) 1:51–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hausman J., Hall B. H., Griliches Z. Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica (1984) 52:909–938CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman J. J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica (1979) 47:153–161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helfat C. E., Lieberman M. B. The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of pre-history. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11:725–760CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huber G. P., Power D. J. Retrospective reports of strategic-level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management J. (1985) 6:171–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Janis I. L., Mann L.Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment (1977) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Jolly V. K.Commercializing New Technologies: Getting from Mind to Market (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Katila R., Ahuja G. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45:1183–1194CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knight F. H.Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (1921) (Houghton Mifflin, New York) Google Scholar
  • Knudsen T., Levinthal D. A. Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18:39–54LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Simon H.Organizations (1958) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • McGrath R. G., MacMillan I. C.The Entrepreneurial Mindset (2000) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • McKnight T.Will It Fly? How to Know If Your Business Idea Has Wings…Before You Take the Leap (2004) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Miller D. J. Technological diversity, related diversification, and firm performance. Strat. Management J. (2006) 27:601–619CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D. J., Fern M. J., Cardinal L. B. The use of knowledge for technological innovation within the diversified firm. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50:308–326CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitchell W. Are more good things better, or will technical and market capabilities conflict when a firm expands? Indust. Corporate Change (1992) 1:327–346CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mullins J. W.The New Business Road Test: What Entrepreneurs and Executives Should Do Before Writing a Business Plan (2003) (FT/Prentice Hall, London) Google Scholar
  • Nerkar A., Roberts P. W. Technological and product-market experience and the success of new product introductions in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25:779–799CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Osborn A. F.Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking (1957) (Scribner, New York) Google Scholar
  • Pelled L. H., Eisenhardt K. M., Xin K. R. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:1–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Penrose E. T.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1959) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Peteraf M. A., Bergen M. E. Scanning dynamic competitive landscapes: A market-based and resource-based framework. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:1027–1041CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peters T. J., Waterman R. H.In Search of Excellence (1982) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Prahalad C. K., Hamel G. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1990) 68(3):79–91Google Scholar
  • Radner R. Bounded rationality, indeterminacy, and the theory of the firm. Econom. J. (1996) 106:1360–1373Google Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., Nerkar A. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:287–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roy P. Leveraging existing technology: The role of alliances in the cross-application across technology domains in high-tech entrepreneurial firms. (2005) . Working paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11:448–469LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S.Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation (2004) (Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S., Venkataraman S. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 24:217–226Google Scholar
  • Simon H. A.Models of Bounded Rationality (1982) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Stuart T. E., Podolny J. M. Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strat. Management J. (1996) 17(Summer Special Issue):21–38Google Scholar
  • Taylor A., Greve H. R. Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:723–740CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westhead P., Wright M. Novice, portfolio, and serial founders: Are they different? J. Bus. Venturing (1998) 13:173–204CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wiersema M. F., Bantel K. A. Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35:91–121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge J. M.Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.