An Integrated Decision-Making Approach for Improving European Air Traffic Management

References

• Bana e Costa C., Nunes da Silva F., Vansnick J. C. Conflict dissolution in the public sector: A case study. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2000) 13:388–401Google Scholar
• Barnhart C., Johnson E. L., Nemhauser G. L., Savelsbergh M. W. P., Vance P. H. Branch-and-price: Column generation for solving huge integer programs. Oper. Res. (1998) 46(3):316–329Link, Google Scholar
• Beck M. P., Lin B. Some heuristics for consensus ranking problem. Comput. Oper. Res. (1983) 10(1):1–7Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belton V., Stewart T. J.Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach (2002) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butler J., Jia J., Dyer J. Simulation techniques for sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria decision models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1997) 103:531–546Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butterworth N. J. Giving up “The smoke”: A major institution investigates alternatives to being sited in the city. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1989) 40(8):711–717Google Scholar
• Chien C. F. A portfolio-evaluation framework for selecting R&D projects. R&D Management (2002) 32(4):359–368Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clemen R. T., Reilly T.Making Hard Decisions (2001) (Duxbury, Pacific Grove, CA) Google Scholar
• Degraeve Z. Scheduling joint product operations with proposal generation methods. (1992) . Ph.D. dissertation, Graduate School of Business, The University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
• Degraeve Z., Koopman G. J. Achieving air quality standards in the European union. Oper. Res. (1998) 46(5):643–654Link, Google Scholar
• Dickinson M. W., Thornton A. C., Graves S. Technology portfolio management: Optimizing interdependent projects over multiple time periods. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2001) 48(4):518–527Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Management Sci. (1990) 36(3):249–258Link, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. S., Edmunds T. A., Butler J. C., Jia J. A multiattribute utility analysis of alternatives for the disposition of surplus weapons-grade plutonium. Oper. Res. (1998) 46(6):749–762Link, Google Scholar
• Edwards W., Barron F. H. SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1994) 60:306–325Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ehrgott M., Wiecek M. M., Figueira J., Greco S., Ehrgott M. Multiobjective programming. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, State of the Art Surveys (2005) (Springer's International Series, New York) . Chap. 17Crossref, Google Scholar
• European Commission The single European sky. (2005) . Retrieved February 1, 2008, http://ec.europa.eu/transport/air_portal/Google Scholar
• Figueira J., Greco S., Ehrgott M.Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, State of the Art Surveys (2005) (Springer's International Series, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• French S.Decision Theory: An Introduction to the Mathematics of Rationality (1986) (Ellis Horwood Limited, England and John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Fox G., Baker N., Bryant J. Economic models for R&D project selection in the presence of project interactions. Management Sci. (1984) 30(7):890–902Link, Google Scholar
• Gershon M., Duckstein L., McAniff R. Multiobjective river basin planning with qualitative criteria. Water Resources Res. (1982) 18(2):193–202Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodwin P., Weight G.Decision Analysis for Management Judgment (2004) (Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England) Google Scholar
• Harker P. T. Incomplete pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarchy process. Math. Model. (1987) 9:837–848Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hotman E., Khosla R., Howlett R. J., Jain L. C. Base reference analytical hierarchy process for engineering process selection. Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2005) (Springer, New York) 184–190Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney R. L. Common mistakes in making value trade-offs. Oper. Res. (2002) 50(6):935–945Link, Google Scholar
• Keeney R. L., Raiffa H.Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (1976) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Liesio J., Mild P., Salo A. Preference programming for robust portfolio modeling and project selection. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2007) 181(3):1488–1505Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lübbecke M. E., Desrosiers J. Selected topics in column generation. Oper. Res. (2005) 53(6):1007–1023Link, Google Scholar
• Medaglia A. L., Graves S. B., Ringuest J. L. A multiobjective evolutionary approach for linearly constrained project selection under uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2007) 179:869–894Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merrick J. R. W., Parnell G. S., Barnett J., Garcia M. A multiple-objective decision analysis of stakeholder values to identify watershed improvement needs. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(1):44–57Link, Google Scholar
• Millet I., Harker P. T. Globally effective questioning in the analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1990) 48(1):88–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parnell G. S., Conley H. W., Jackson J. A., Lehmkuhl L. J., Andrew J. M. Foundations 2025: A value model for evaluating future air and space forces. Management Sci. (1998) 44(10):1336–1350Link, Google Scholar
• Petrovski A., McCall J., Zitzler E., Deb K., Thiele L., Coello Coello C. A., Corne D. Multi-objective optimisation of cancer chemotherapy using evolutionary algorithms. Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2001) 1993(Springer-Verlag, London) 531–545Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips L. D. A theory of requisite decision models. Acta Psychologica (1984) 56:29–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reynolds T. G., Ren L., Clarke J.-P. B., Burke A. S., Green M.History, Development and Analysis of Noise Abatement Arrival Procedures for UK Airports (2005) . AIAA 5th Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations Forum, Arlington, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
• Saaty T. L. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1990) 48(1):9–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santhanam R., Kyparisis G. J. Theory and methodology a decision model for interdependent information system project selection. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1996) 89:380–399Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schrage L.Optimization Modeling with Lingo (2000) (Lindo Systems, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Shane S. A., Ulrich K. T. Technological innovation, product development, and entrepreneurship in management science. Management Sci. (2004) 50(2):133–144Link, Google Scholar
• Solak S., Clarke J.-P. B., Johnson E. L., Barnes E., Collopy P.Optimization of Technology Development Portfolios (2008) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Stewart T. J., Scott L. A scenario-based framework for multicriteria decision analysis in water resources planning. Water Resources Res. (1995) 31(11):2835–2843Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stirling A., Mayer S.Rethinking Risk: A Pilot Multi-Criteria Mapping of a Genetically Modified Crop in Agricultural Systems in the UK (SPRU Reports) (1999) (Science and Technology Policy Research, Brighton, UK) Google Scholar
• Tavana M. CROSS: A multicriteria group-decision-making model for evaluating and prioritizing advanced-technology projects at NASA. Interfaces (2003) 33(3):40–56Link, Google Scholar
• Vanderbeck F. On Dantzig-Wolfe decomposition in integer programming and ways to perform branching in a branch-and-price algorithm. Oper. Res. (2000) 48(1):111–128Link, Google Scholar