When Rational Sellers Face Nonrational Buyers: Evidence from Herding on eBay

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0881

References

  • Ariely D., Simonson I. Buying, bidding, playing, or competing? Value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions. J. Consumer Psych. (2003) 13(1–2):113–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bajari P., Hortacsu A. The winner's curse, reserve prices, and endogenous entry: Empirical insights from eBay auctions. RAND J. Econom. (2003) 34(2):329–355CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bajari P., Hortacsu A. Economic insights from Internet auctions. J. Econom. Literature (2004) 42(2):457–486CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banerjee A. V. A simple-model of herd behavior. Quart. J. Econom. (1992) 107(3):797–817CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barber B. M., Odean T. All that glitters: The effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors. Rev. Financial Stud. (2008) 21(2):785–818CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bikhchandani S., Hirshleifer D., Welch I. A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural-change as informational cascades. J. Political Econom. (1992) 100(5):992–1026CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brint A. T. Investigating buyer and seller strategies in online auctions. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2003) 54(11):1177–1188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dodonova A., Khoroshilov Y. English auctions with loss averse bidders. (2005) . Working paper, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. http://ssrn.com/abstract=922534CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisensee T., Strömberg D. News droughts, news floods, and U.S. disaster relief. Quart. J. Econom. (2007) 122(2):693–728CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Häubl G., Popkowski Leszczyc P. T. L. Minimum prices and product valuations in auctions. Marketing Sci. Inst. Rep. (2003) 3(03-117):115–141Google Scholar
  • Heider F.The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (1958) (Wiley & Sons, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heyman J., Orhun Y., Ariely D. Auction fever: The effects of opponents and quasi-endowment on product valuations. J. Interactive Marketing (2004) 18(4):7–15CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hossain T., Morgan J. …Plus shipping and handling: Revenue (non)equivalence in field experiment on eBay. Adv. Econom. Anal. Policy (2006) 6(2). Article 3Google Scholar
  • Kamins M. A., Dreze X., Folkes V. S. Effects of seller-supplied prices on buyers' product evaluations: Reference prices in an Internet auction context. J. Consumer Res. (2004) 30(4):622–628CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ku G., Galinsky A. D., Murnighan J. K. Starting low but ending high: A reversal of the anchoring effect in auctions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2006) 90(6):975–986CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ku G., Malhotra D., Murnighan J. K. Towards a competitive arousal model of decision-making: A study of auction fever in live and Internet auctions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2005) 96(2):89–103CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lucking-Reiley D. Auctions on the Internet: What's being auctioned, and how? J. Indust. Econom. (2000) 48(3):227–252CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mackenzie S. B. The role of attention in mediating the effect of advertising on attribute importance. J. Consumer Res. (1986) 13:174–195CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nisbett R. E., Ross L.Human Inference (1980) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Ockenfels A., Reiley D. H., Sadrieh A., Hendershott T. Online auctions. Handbook of Information Systems and Economics (2008) (Elsevier Science). ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Park Y.-H., Bradlow E. T. An integrated model for bidding behavior in Internet auctions: Whether, who, when, and how much. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(November):470–482CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reiley D. H., Rapoport A., Zwick R. Experimental evidence on the endogenous entry of bidders in Internet auctions. Experimental Business Research, Vol. 2: Economic and Managerial Perspectives (2005) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) 103–121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor S. E., Fiske S. T. Point of view and perceptions of causality. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1975) 32(3):439–445CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson T. D., Schooler J. W. Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1991) 60(2):181–192CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.