Choice Interactions and Business Strategy

References

• Andrews K.The Concept of Corporate Strategy (1971) (Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL) Google Scholar
• Arrow K. J. Optimal capital policy, the cost of capital, and myopic decision rules. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. (1964) 16:21–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C., Clark K.Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellman R.Dynamic Programming (1957) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Burgelman R. Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:24–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Ethiraj E., Levinthal D. Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Sci. (2004) 50:159–173Link, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj E., Levinthal D. Bounded rationality and the search for organizational architecture: An evolutionary perspective on the design of organizations and their evolvability. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2005) 49:404–437Google Scholar
• Gavetti G., Levinthal D. Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:113–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P.Commitment (1991) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Kauffman S., Stein D. Adaptation on rugged fitness landscapes. Lectures in the Sciences of Complexity (1989) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) 527–618Google Scholar
• Kauffman S.The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution (1993) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lenox M. J., Rockart S. F., Lewin A. J. Interdependency, competition, and industry dynamics. Management Sci. (2007) 53:599–615Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. (1997) 43(7):934–950Link, Google Scholar
• Lewis A. On effectively computable realizations of choice functions. Math. Soc. Sci. (1985) 10:43–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacCormack A., Rusnak J., Baldwin C. Y. Exploring the structure of complex software designs: An empirical study of open source and proprietary code. (2004) . Working Paper Series 05-016, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
• March J., Simon H.Organizations (1958) (John Wiley & Co., New York) Google Scholar
• Milgrom P., Roberts J. The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80(3):511–528Google Scholar
• Milgrom P., Roberts J. The economics of modern manufacturing: Reply. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1995) 85(4):997Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H. Patterns in strategy formulation. Management Sci. (1978) 24:934–948Link, Google Scholar
• Porter M. E. What is strategy? Harvard Business Rev. (1996) November–December):61–78Google Scholar
• Rivkin J. W. Consequences of fit. (1997) . Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Rivkin J. W. Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. (2000) 46:824–844Link, Google Scholar
• Rivkin J. W., Siggelkow N. Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. (2003) 49:290–321Link, Google Scholar
• Rivkin J. W., Siggelkow N. Patterned interactions in complex systems: Implications for exploration. Management Sci. (2007) 53:1068–1085Link, Google Scholar
• Sharman D. M., Yassine A. A. Characterizing complex product architectures. Systems Engrg. J. (2004) 7(1):35–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N. Evolution towards fit. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002a) 47:125–159Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N. Misperceiving interactions among complements and substitutes: Organizational consequences. Management Sci. (2002b) 48:900–917Link, Google Scholar
• Simon H. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. (1955) 69:99–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H. The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. (1962) 106:467–482Google Scholar
• Solow D., Burnetas A., Roeder T., Greenspan N. Evolutionary consequences of selected locus-specific variations in epistasis and fitness contribution in Kauffman's NK model. J. Theoret. Biol. (1999) 196:181–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sussman H. J. Catastrophe theory. Synthese (1975) 31(2):4Google Scholar
• Teece D., Pisano G. The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction. Indust. Corporate Change (1994) 3:537–556Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Topkis D. M. Minimizing a submodular function on a lattice. Oper. Res. (1978) 26(2):305–331Link, Google Scholar
• Topkis D. M. Comparative statics of the firm. J. Econom. Theory (1995) 67(2):370–401Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weinberger E. Local properties of Kauffman's N-K Model: A tunably rugged energy landscape. Physical Rev. A (1991) 44:6399–6413Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright S. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics (1931) 16:97–159Crossref, Google Scholar