Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0884

References

  • Anderson E. G., Davis-Blake A., Erzurumlu S. S., Joglekar N. R., Parker G. G., Loch C., Kavadias S. The effects of outsourcing, offshoring, and distributed product development organization on coordinating the NPD process. Handbook of New Product Development Management (2006) (Butterworth Heinemann-Elsevier, Burlington, MA) 259–290Google Scholar
  • Bulkeley W. M. Got a better letter opener? Staples solicits inventive ideas from the public for products it can brand, sell exclusively. Wall Street Journal (2006) July 13Google Scholar
  • Che Y., Gale I. Optimal design of research contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2003) 93(3):646–671CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen F., Xiao W. Salesforce incentives and information screening: Individualistic vs. competitive schemes. (2005) . Working paper, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Chesbrough H. W.Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (2003) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Dahan E., Mendelson H. An extreme-value model of concept testing. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):102–116LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Deng S., Elmaghraby W. Parallel sourcing with a tournament. Productions Oper. Management (2005) 14(2):252–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eppinger S. D., Chitkara A. R. The new practice of global product development. Sloan Management Rev. (2006) 47(4):22–30Google Scholar
  • Fullerton R. L., McAfee R. P. Auctioning entry into tournaments. J. Political Econom. (1999) 107(3):573–605CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glazer A., Hassin R. Optimal contests. Econom. Inquiry (1988) 26(1):133–143CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ha A., Porteus E. L. Optimal timing of reviews in concurrent design for manufacturability. Management Sci. (1995) 41(9):1431–1447LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hempel J. Crowdsourcing—Milk the masses for inspiration. Bus. Week (2006) September 25Google Scholar
  • Huston L., Sakkab N. Connect and develop: Inside Procter & Gambles's new model for innovation. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2006) 84(3):58–67Google Scholar
  • Kalra A., Shi M. Designing optimal sales contests: A theoretical perspective. Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(2):170–193LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Krishnan V., Ulrich K. T. Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):1–21LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lakhani K. R., Jeppesen L. B., Lohse P. A., Panetta J. A. The value of openness in scientific problem solving. (2007) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear E. P., Rosen S. Rank order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econom. (1981) 89(5):841–864CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loch C. H., Kavadias S.Handbook of New Product Development Management (2007) (Butterworth Heinemann-Elsevier, Burlington, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loch C. H., DeMeyer A., Pich M. T.Managing the Unknown: A New Approach to Managing High Uncertainty and Risk in Projects (2006) (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loch C. H., Huberman B. A., Stout S. T. Status competition and performance in work groups. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2000) 43:35–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loch C. H., Terwiesch C., Thomke S. Parallel and sequential testing of design alternatives. Management Sci. (2001) 47(5):663–678LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mihm J., Loch C., Huchzermeier A. Problem-solving oscillations in complex engineering projects. Management Sci. (2003) 49(6):733–750LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moldovanu B., Sela A. The optimal allocation of prizes in contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91(3):542–558CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Novak S., Eppinger S. D. Sourcing by design: Product complexity and the supply chain. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):189–204LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Snir E., Hitt L. M. The emerging knowledge economy: Exchange in Internet spot markets for IT services. Management Sci. (2003) 49(11):1504–1520LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sommer S. C., Loch C. Selectionism and learning in projects with complexity and unforeseeable uncertainty. Management Sci. (2004) 50(10):1334–1347LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor C. R. Digging for golden carrots: An analysis of research tournaments. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1995) 85(4):872–890Google Scholar
  • Taylor W. C. Here's an idea: Let everyone have ideas. New York Times (2006) March 26Google Scholar
  • Terwiesch C., Loch C. H. Collaborative prototyping and the pricing of custom-designed products. Management Sci. (2004) 50(2):145–158LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Terwiesch C., Ulrich K. T.Innovation (2008) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Ulrich K. T.Design: The Creation of Artifacts in Society (2008) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Ulrich K. T., Ellison D. J. Holistic customer requirements and the design-select decision. Management Sci. (1999) 45(5):641–658LinkGoogle Scholar
  • von Hippel E.Democratizing Innovation (2005) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weitzman M. L. Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica (1979) 47(3):641–654CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whang S. Contracting for software development. Management Sci. (1992) 38(3):307–324LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.