Identifying Formal and Informal Influence in Technology Adoption with Network Externalities

References

• Allison P. D. Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories. Sociol. Methodology (1982) 13:61–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonacich P. Power and centrality: A family of measures. Amer. J. Sociol. (1987) 92(5):1170–1182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G., Freeman L. C. UCInet for windows: Software for social network analysis. (2002) . Technical report, Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MAGoogle Scholar
• Bothner M. Competition and social influence: The diffusion of the sixth generation processor in the global computer industry. Amer. J. Sociol. (2007) 6:1175–1210Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Kemerer C. Network externalities in microcomputer software: An econometric analysis of the spreadsheet market. Management Sci. (1996) 42:1627–1647Link, Google Scholar
• Burt R. S. Innovation as a structural interest: Rethinking the impact of network position on innovation adoption. Soc. Networks (1980) 2(4):327–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R. S.Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (1992) (Harvard University Press, Boston) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R. S., Sutton R. I., Staw B. M. The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior (2000) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 345–423Crossref, Google Scholar
• Centola D., Macy M. W. Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (2007) 113:702–734Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chamberlain G. Heterogeneity, omitted variable bias, and duration dependency. Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data (1985) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 3–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Czepiel J. A. Word-of-mouth processes in diffusion of a major technological innovation. J. Marketing Res. (1974) 11(2):172–180Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Lengel R. H. Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. Research in Organizational Behavior (1986) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 191–233Google Scholar
• Farrell J., Saloner G. Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. RAND J. Econom. (1985) 16:70–83Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman L. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry (1977) 40:35–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedkin N. E. Theoretical foundations for centrality measures. Amer. J. Sociol. (1991) 96(6):1478–1504Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gandal N. Hedonic price indexes for spreadsheets and an empirical test for network externalities. RAND J. Econom. (1994) 25(1):160–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garip F., DiMaggio P. Modeling intergroup inequality in diffusion processes with strong network externalities. (2008) . Working paper, Princeton University, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
• Gaspar J., Glaeser E. Information technology and the future of cities. J. Urban Econom. (1998) 43:136–156Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godes D., Mayzlin D. Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):545–560Link, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A. State dependence at internet portals. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2006) 15(2):317–352Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gowrisankaran G., Stavins J. Network externalities and technology adoption: Lessons from electronic payments. RAND J. Econom. (2004) 35(2):260–276Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78(6):1360–1380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. Threshold models of collective behavior. Amer. J. Sociol. (1978) 83(6):1420–1443Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 42):82–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz E., Lazarsfeld P. F.Personal Influence (1955) (Free Press, Glencoe, IL) Google Scholar
• Katz M. L., Shapiro C. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985) 75(3):424–40Google Scholar
• Kraut R. E., Rice R. E., Cool C., Fish R. S. Varieties of social influence: The role of utility and norms in the success of a new communication medium. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(4):437–453Link, Google Scholar
• Liebowitz S. J., Margolis S. E. Network externality: An uncommon tragedy. J. Econom. Perspectives (1994) 8(2):133–150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski C. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1993) 60(3):531–542Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marlow E.Corporate Television Programming: Applications and Technologies (1992) (KIP, Inc., White Plains, NY) Google Scholar
• Monge P. R., Contractor N. S.Theories of Communication Networks (2003) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newey W. Simultaneous estimation of limited dependent variable models with endogenous explanatory variables. J. Econometrics (1987) 36:231–250Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M., Stuart T. E. A role-based ecology of technological change. Amer. J. Sociol. (1995) 100(5):1224–1260Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers E. M.Diffusion of Innovations (2003) 5th ed.(Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Rohlfs J. A theory of interdependent demand for a communications service. Bell J. Econom. (1974) 5(1):16–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan S., Tucker C. Heterogeneity and the dynamics of technology adoption. (2007) . Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Rysman M. Competition between networks: A study of the market for yellow pages. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2004) 71(2):483–512Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saloner G., Shepard A. Adoption of technologies with network effects: An empirical examination of the adoption of automated teller machines. RAND J. Econom. (1994) 26(3):479–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strang D., Macy M. W. In search of excellence: Fads, success stories, and adaptive emulation. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001) 107(1):147–182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sundararajan A. Nonlinear pricing and type-dependent network effects. Econom. Lett. (2004) 83:107–113Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker C. Two-sided network effects in the adoption of electronic payments. (2004) . Discussion Paper 03-11, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Tucker C. Heterogeneity and positive-feedback in two-sided networks. (2008) . Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
• Tushman M. Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1977) 22(39):587–606Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Den Bulte C., Lilien G. A two-stage model of innovation adoption with partial observability: Model development and application. (2007) . Working paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar