Top Management Team Diversity and Firm Performance: Moderators of Functional-Background and Locus-of-Control Diversity

References

• Aiken L. S., West S. C.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Allen N. A., Stanley D. J., Williams H. M., Ross S. J. Assessing the impact of nonresponse on work group diversity effects. Organ. Res. Methods (2007) 10:262–285Crossref, Google Scholar
• Attneave F.Applications of Information Theory to Psychology (1959) (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York) Google Scholar
• Austin J. R. Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88:866–878Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balkundi P., Harrison D. A. Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about the effects of network structure on team viability and performance. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:49–68Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barkema H. G., Shvyrkov O. Does top management team diversity promote or hamper foreign expansion. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28:663–680Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrick M. R., Bradley B. H., Kristof-Brown A. L., Colbert A. E. The moderating role of top management team interdependence: Implications for real teams and working groups. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50:544–557Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrick M. R., Stewart G. L., Neubert M. J., Mount M. K. Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. J. Appl. Psych. (1998) 83:377–391Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barsade S. G., Ward A. J., Turner J. D., Sonnenfeld J. A. To your hearts content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:802–836Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bliese P. D., Klein K. J., Kozlowski S. W. J. Within-group agreement, nonindependence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (2000) (Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer, San Francisco) 349–382Google Scholar
• Boone C., De Brabander B., Hellemans J. Locus of control and small-firm performance: A research note. Organ. Stud. (2000) 21:641–646Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boone C., De Brabander B., van Witteloostuijn A. CEO locus of control and small firm performance: An integrative framework and empirical test. J. Management Stud. (1996) 33:667–699Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boone C., van Olffen W., van Witteloostuijn A. Psychological team make-up as a determinant of economic firm performance: An experimental study. J. Econom. Psych. (1998) 19:43–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boone C., van Olffen W., van Witteloostuijn A. Team locus of control composition, leadership structure, information acquisition and financial performance: A business simulation game study. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:889–909Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brodbeck F. C., Kerschreiter R., Mojzisch A., Schulz-Hardt S. Group decision making under conditions of distributed knowledge: The information asymmetries model. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32:459–479Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson J. S. Team member functional background and involvement in management teams: Direct effects and the moderating role of power centralization. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46:458–474Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunderson J. S., Sutcliffe K. M. Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45:875–893Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carmeli A., Schaubroeck J. Top management team behavioral integration, decision quality, and organizational decline. Leadership Quart. (2006) 17:441–453Crossref, Google Scholar
• Certo S. T., Lester R. H., Dalton C. M., Dalton D. R. Top management teams, strategy and financial performance: A meta-analytic examination. J. Management Stud. (2006) 43:813–839Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J., Cohen P., West S. G., Aiken L. S.Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2003) 3rd ed.(Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Cronin M. A., Weingart L. R. Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Acad. Management J. (2007) 32:761–773Google Scholar
• Cummings J. N. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. (2004) 50:352–364Link, Google Scholar
• Cycyota C. S., Harrison D. A. What (not) to expect when surveying executives: A meta-analysis of top manager response rates and techniques over time. Organ. Res. Methods (2006) 9:133–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlin K. B., Weingart L. R., Hinds P. J. Team diversity and information use. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:1107–1123Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Brabander B., Thiers G. Successful information system development in relation to situational factors which affect communication between MIS users and EDP specialists. Management Sci. (1984) 30:137–155Link, Google Scholar
• De Dreu C. K. W., van Vianen A. E. M. Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of teams. J. Organ. Behav. (2001) 22:309–328Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu C. K. W., Weingart L. R. Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88:741–749Crossref, Google Scholar
• Declerck C. H., Boone C., De Brabander B. On feeling in control: A biological theory for individual differences in control perception. Brain Cognition (2006) 62:143–176Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deutsch M.Conflict Resolution: Constructive and Destructive Processes (1973) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. C., Roberto M. A., Watkins M. D. A dynamic model of top management team effectiveness: Managing unstructured task streams. Leadership Quart. (2003) 14:297–325Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S. Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35:505–538Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedkin N. E., Slater M. R. School leadership and performance: A social network approach. Sociol. Ed. (1994) 67:139–157Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruenfeld D. H., Mannix E. A., Williams K. Y., Neale M. A. Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1996) 67:1–15Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C., Staw B. M., Cummings L. Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the team label. Research in Organizational Behavior (1994) 16(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 171–214Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C. Fragmentation and the other problems CEOs have with their top management teams. Calif. Management Rev. (1995) 37:110–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C. Upper echelons theory: An update. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32:334–343Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D. C., Mason P. A. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9:193–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison D., Klein K. J. What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32:1199–1228Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison D., Price K., Bell M. Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41:96–107Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison D. A., Price K. H., Gavin J. H., Florey A. T. Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Acad. Management J. (2002) 5:1029–1045Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiller N. J., Hambrick D. C. Conceptualizing executive hubris: The role of (hyper-)core self-evaluations in strategic decision making. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26:297–319Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoyle R. H., Crawford A. M. Use of individual-level data to investigate group phenomena. Small Group Res. (1994) 25:464–486Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H., Nohria N., Eccles R. G. Structural alignments, individual strategies, and managerial action: Elements toward a network theory of getting things done. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action (1992) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Ilgen D. R., Hollenbeck J. R., Johnson M., Jundt D. Teams in organizations: From I-P-O models to IMOI models. Annual Rev. Psych. (2005) 56:517–543Crossref, Google Scholar
• James L. R., Demaree R. G., Wolf G. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. (1984) 69:85–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A., Northcraft G. B., Neale M. A. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:741–763Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge T. A., Erez A., Bono J. E., Thoresen C. J. Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2002) 83:693–710Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz R. The interaction between intragroup conflict and leadership effectiveness. Acad. Management Proc. (1977) 66–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein J. K., Harrison D. A. On the diversity of diversity: Tidy logic, messier realities. Acad. Management Perspectives (2007) 21:26–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kotlyar I., Karakowsky L. Leading conflict? Linkages between leader behaviors and group conflict. Small Group Res. (2006) 37:377–403Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larson J. R., Foster-Fishman P. G., Fransz T. M. Leadership style and the discussion of shared and unshared information in decision making groups. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1998) 24:482–495Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lefcourt H. M.Locus of Control: Current Trends in Theory and Research (1982) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Li J., Hambrick D. C. Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegration of groups in work teams. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:794–813Crossref, Google Scholar
• McClelland G. H., Judd C. M. Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psych. Bull. (1993) 114:376–390Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D., Kets de Vries M. F. R., Toulouse J. M. Top executives locus of control and its relationship to strategy-making, structure, and environment. Acad. Management J. (1982) 25:237–253Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohammed S., Angell L. C. Surface- and deep-level diversity in workgroups: Examining the moderating effect of team orientation and team process on relationship conflict. J. Organ. Behav. (2004) 25:1015–1039Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moynihan L. M., Peterson R. S. A contingent configuration approach to understanding the role of personality in organizational groups. Res. Organ. Behav. (2001) 23:327–380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murnighan J. K., Conlon D. E. The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:165–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunnally J. C.Psychometric Theory (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• O'Reilly C. A., Roberts K. H. Relationships among components of credibility and communication behavior in work units. J. Appl. Psych. (1976) 61:99–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Reilly C. A., Caldwell D. F., Barnett W. P. Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34:21–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Page S. E. Making the difference: Applying a logic of diversity. Acad. Management Perspectives (2007) 21:6–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pedhazur E. J., Schmelkin L. P.Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach (1991) (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Pelled L. H., Eisenhardt K. M., Xin K. R. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:1–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pitcher P., Smith A. D. Top management team heterogeneity: Personality, power, and proxies. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:1–18Link, Google Scholar
• Priem R. L., Lyon D. E., Dess G. G. Inherent limitations of demographic proxies in top management team heterogeneity research. J. Management (1999) 25:935–953Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rahim M. A. Relationships of leader power to compliance and satisfaction with supervision: Evidence from a national sample of managers. J. Management (1989) 15:545–556Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson R. B. Measures of small firm effectiveness for strategic planning research. J. Small Bus. Management (1983) 21:22–29Google Scholar
• Roth P. L. Missing data: A conceptual review for applied psychologists. Personnel Psych. (1994) 47:537–560Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rotter J. B. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psych. Monographs (1966) 80:1–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rulke D. L., Gelaskiewicz J. Distribution of knowledge, group network structure and group performance. Management Sci. (2000) 46:612–625Link, Google Scholar
• Schwartz S. H., Bilsky W. Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1990) 58:878–891Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simons T., Pelled L. H., Smith K. A. Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42:662–673Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simsek Z., Veiga J. F., Lubatkin M. H., Dino R. N. Modeling the multilevel determinants of top management team behavioral integration. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:69–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Southwood K. E. Substantive theory and statistical interaction: Five models. Amer. J. Sociol. (1978) 83:1154–1203Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stasser G., Stewart D. Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1992) 63:426–434Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stasser G., Stewart D., Wittenbaum G. M. Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1995) 31:244–265Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ury W.Getting Past No: Negotiating with Difficult People (1991) (Bantam Books, Boston) Google Scholar
• van der Vegt G., Bunderson J. S. Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48:532–547Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D., De Dreu C. K. W., Homan A. C. Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. J. Appl. Psych. (2004) 89:1008–1022Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Vianen A. E. M., De Dreu C. K. W. Personality in teams: Its relationship to social cohesion, task cohesion, and team performance. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psych. (2001) 10:97–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waller M. J., Huber G. P., Glick W. H. Functional background as a determinant of executives' selective perception. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38:943–974Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wegner D. M., Mullen B., Goethals G. R. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Theories of Group Behavior (1986) (Springer-Verlag, New York) 185–208Google Scholar
• Zuckerman M.Sensation Seeking: Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal (1979) (Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar