Optimal Auditing with Scoring: Theory and Application to Insurance Fraud

References

• Antle R., Gordon E., Narayanamoorthy G., Zhou L. The joint determination of audit fees, non-audit fees, and abnormal accruals. Rev. Quant. Finance Accounting (2006) 27:235–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Artis M., Ayuso M., Guillén M. Detection of automobile insurance fraud with discrete choice models and misclassified claims. J. Risk Insurance (2002) 69:325–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baiman S., Rajan M. V. On the design of unconditional monitoring systems in agencies. Accounting Rev. (1994) 69:217–229Google Scholar
• Beasley M. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. Accounting Rev. (1996) 71:443–465Google Scholar
• Belhadji E. B., Dionne G., Tarkhani F. A model for the detection of insurance fraud. Geneva Papers Risk Insurance Issues Practice (2000) 25:517–538Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beneish M. Detecting GAAP violation: Implications for assessing earnings management among firms with extreme financial performance. J. Accounting Public Policy (1997) 16:271–309Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyer M. M. Mitigating insurance fraud: Lump-sum awards, premium subsidies, and indemnity taxes. J. Risk Insurance (2001) 68:403–435Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caplan D. Internal controls and the detection of management fraud. J. Accounting Res. (1999) 37:101–117Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen P. O., Demski J. S., Frimor H. Accounting policies in agencies with moral hazard and renegotiation. J. Accounting Res. (2002) 40:1071–1090Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crocker K. J., Morgan R. J. Is honesty the best policy? Curtailing insurance fraud through optimal incentive contracts. J. Political Econom. (1997) 106:355–375Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crocker K. J., Tennyson S. Insurance fraud and optimal claims settlement strategies. J. Law Econom. (2002) 45:469–507Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dechow P., Sloan R., Sweeney A. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Res. (1996) 13:1–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dechow P., Ge W., Larson C. R., Sloan R. G. Predicting material accounting misstatements. (2007) . Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
• Derrig R. A., Weisberg H. I. Auto bodily injury claim settlement in Massachusetts. (2003) . Document, Automobile Insurers Bureau of Massachusetts, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Dionne G., Gagné R. Deductible contracts against fraudulent claims: Evidence from automobile insurance. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2001) 83:290–301Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dionne G., Gagné R. Replacement cost endorsement and opportunistic fraud in automobile insurance. J. Risk Uncertainty (2002) 24:213–230Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duda R. O., Hart P. E., Stork E. G.Pattern Classification (2001) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Dunn P. The impact of insider power on fraudulent financial reporting. J. Management (2004) 30:397–412Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dye R. A. Auditing standards, legal liability, and auditor wealth. J. Political Econom. (1993) 101:887–914Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gale D., Hellwig M. Incentive-compatible debt contracts: The one-period problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1985) 52:647–663Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graetz M. J., Reinganum J. F., Wilde L. L. The tax compliance game: Toward an interactive theory of law enforcement. J. Law Econom. Organ. (1986) 2:1–32Google Scholar
• Knowles J., Persico N., Todd P. Racial bias in motor vehicle searches: Theory and evidence. J. Political Econom. (2001) 109:203–229Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kofman F., Lawarrée J. Collusion in hierarchical agency. Econometrica (1993) 61:629–656Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melumad M. D., Mookherjee D. Delegation as commitment: The case of income tax audits. RAND J. Econom. (1989) 20:139–163Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mookherjee D., Png I. P. L. Optimal auditing insurance and distribution. Quart. J. Econom. (1989) 104:399–415Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morton S. Strategic auditing for fraud. Accounting Rev. (1993) 68:825–839Google Scholar
• Narayanan V. G. An analysis of auditor liability rules. J. Accounting Res. (1994) 32(Supplement):39–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman D. P., Patterson E., Smith R. The influence of potentially fraudulent reports on audit risk assessment and planning. Accounting Rev. (2001) 76:59–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pae S., Yoo S.-W. Strategic interaction in auditing: An analysis of auditors' legal liability, internal control system quality, and audit effort. Accounting Rev. (2001) 76:333–356Crossref, Google Scholar
• Persico N. Racial profiling, fairness, and effectiveness of policing. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92:1472–1497Crossref, Google Scholar
• Picard P. On the design of optimal insurance contracts under manipulation of audit costs. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1999) 41:1049–1071Crossref, Google Scholar
• Picard P., Dionne G. Economic analysis of insurance fraud. Handbook of Insurance (2000) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) 315–362Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shibano T. Assessing audit risk from errors and irregularities. J. Accounting Res. (1990) 28:110–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simunic D. A. Auditing, consulting, and auditor independence. J. Accounting Res. (1984) 22:679–702Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skousen C. J., Wright C. J. Contemporaneous risk factors and the prediction of financial statement fraud. (2006) . Working paper, University of Texas, ArlingtonCrossref, Google Scholar
• Summers S., Sweeney J. Fraudulently misstated financial statements and insider trading: An empirical analysis. Accounting Rev. (1998) 73:131–146Google Scholar
• Townsend R. Optimal contracts and competitive markets with costly state verification. J. Econom. Theory (1979) 21:265–293Crossref, Google Scholar
• Townsend R. Information constrained insurance: The revelation principle extended. J. Monetary Econom. (1988) 21:411–450Crossref, Google Scholar
• Viaene S., Derrig R. A., Baesens B., Dedene G. A comparison of state-of-the-art classification techniques for expert automobile insurance claim fraud detection. J. Risk Insurance (2002) 69:373–422Crossref, Google Scholar