Exploring the Relationship Between Scientist Human Capital and Firm Performance: The Case of Biomedical Academic Entrepreneurs in the SBIR Program

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0913

References

  • Agrawal A., Henderson R. Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Sci. (2002) 48(1):44–60LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Allen T. J.Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Astebro T., Bernhardt I. The winner's curse of human capital. Small Bus. Econom. (2005) 24:63–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azoulay P., Ding W., Stuart T. The determinants of faculty patenting behavior: Demographics or opportunities. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2007) 63(4):599–623CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cockburn I. M., Henderson R. M. Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. J. Indust. Econom. (1998) 46(2):157–182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corolleur C. D. F., Carrere M., Mangematin V. Turning scientific and technological human capital into economic capital: The experience of biotech start-ups in France. Res. Policy (2004) 33:631–642CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dasgupta P., David P. A. Toward a new economics of science. Res. Policy (1994) 23:487–521CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Etzkowitz H. Research groups as “quasi-firms”: The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Res. Policy (2003) 32:109–121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gittelman M., Kogut B. Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):366–382LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Grant R. M. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(4):375–387LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hall B. H., Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M. The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. (2001) . NBER Working Paper 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson R., Cockburn I. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:63–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Institute of Medicine (IOM)Scientific Opportunities and Public Needs: Improving Priority Setting and Public Input at the National Institutes of Health (1998) (National Academies, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
  • Jensen R., Thursby M. Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 19(1):240–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replications of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Latour B., Woolgar S.Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (1979) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Leibert R. J. Research-grant getting and productivity among scholars. J. Higher Ed. (1977) 48:164–192CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Louis K. S., Blumenthal D., Gluck M. E., Stoto M. A. Entrepreneurs in academe: An exploration of behaviors among life scientists. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34:110–131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murray F. Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: Exploring tissue engineering. Res. Policy (2002) 31:1389–1403CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murray F. The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: Sharing the laboratory life. Res. Policy (2004) 33:643–659CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH), Office of Extramural Research National survey to evaluate the NIH SBIR program. (2003) . Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MDGoogle Scholar
  • Owen-Smith J., Powell W. W. To patent of not: Faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer. J. Tech. Transfer (2001) 26:99–114CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Packer K., Webster A. Patenting culture in science: Reinventing the scientific wheel of credibility. Sci. Tech. Human Values (1996) 21(4):427–453CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell W. W., Owen-Smith J. Universities and the market for intellectual property in the life sciences. J. Policy Anal. Management (1998) 27(2):253–277CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stephan P. E., Gurmu S., Sumell A. J., Black G. Who's patenting in the university? Evidence from the survey of doctorate recipients. Econom. Innovation New Tech. (2007) 16(2):71–99CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stern S. Do scientists pay to be scientists? Management Sci. (2004) 50(6):835–853LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thursby J. G., Thursby M. C. Are faculty critical? Their role in university-industry licensing. Contemporary Econom. Policy (2004) 22(2):162–178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Toole A. A., Czarnitzki D. Biomedical academic entrepreneurship through the SBIR program. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2007) 63(4):716–738CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M. L. Boundary spanning roles in the innovation process. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1977) 22(4):587–605CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zucker L. G., Darby M. Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1996) 93:12709–12716CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zucker L. G., Darby M. R., Armstrong J. S. Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Sci. (2002) 48(1):138–153LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zucker L. G., Darby M. R., Brewer M. B. Geographically localized knowledge: Spillovers or markets? Econom. Inquiry (1998) 36(1):65–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.