How Does Outsourcing Affect Performance Dynamics? Evidence from the Automobile Industry

References

• Anderlini L., Felli L. Incomplete contracts and complexity costs. Theory Decision (1999) 46(1):23–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres N., Bigelow L. Do transaction costs matter for survival at all stages of the industry life cycle? Management Sci. (2007) 53(8):1332–1344Link, Google Scholar
• Bajari P., Tadelis S. Incentives versus transaction costs: A theory of procurement contracts. RAND J. Econom. (2001) 32(3):387–407Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker G., Hubbard T. Contractibility and asset ownership: On-board computers and governance in U.S. trucking. Quart. J. Econom. (2004) 119(4):1443–1479Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker G., Gibbons R., Murphy K. Subjective performance measures in optimal incentive contracts. Quart. J. Econom. (1994) 109(4):1125–1156Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker G., Gibbons R., Murphy K. Relational contracts and the theory of the firm. Quart. J. Econom. (2002) 117(1):39–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battigalli P., Maggi G. Costly contracting in a long-term relationship. (2004) . Working Paper EC-04-33, Stern School of Business, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Bigelow L. Make-or-buy revisited: A longitudinal, population-wide test of transaction cost alignment. (2003) . Working paper, Olin School of Management, Washington University, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
• Conner K. R., Prahalad C. K. A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(5):477–501Link, Google Scholar
• Dye R. A. Costly contract contingencies. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1985) 26(1):233–250Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forbes S. J., Lederman M. Control rights, network structure and vertical integration: Evidence from regional airlines. (2005) . Working paper, University of California, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
• Grant R. M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:109–122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart O. Incomplete contracts and the theory of the firm. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1988) 4(1):119–139Google Scholar
• Hart O., Moore J. Property rights and the nature of the firm. J. Political Econom. (1990) 98:1119–1158Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein P. G. The make-or-buy decision: Lessons from empirical studies. (2004) . Working Paper 2004-07, Contracting and Organizations Research Institute, Columbia, MOGoogle Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397Link, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(5):502–518Link, Google Scholar
• Lafontaine F., Slade M. Vertical integration and firm boundaries: The evidence. J. Econom. Literature (2007) 45(3):631–687Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiblein M. J., Reuer J. J., Dalsace F. E. Do make-or-buy decisions matter? The influence of organizational governance on technological performance. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23:817–833Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macher J. T. Technological development and the boundaries of the firm: A knowledge-based examination in semiconductor manufacturing. Management Sci. (2006) 52(6):826–843Link, Google Scholar
• Macher J. T., Richman B. D. Transaction cost economics: An assessment of empirical research in the social sciences. Bus. Politics (2008) 10(1). Article 1Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masten S. Transaction costs, mistakes, and performance: Assessing the importance of governance. Managerial and Decision Econom. (1993) 14:119–129Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masten S., Saussier S., Brousseau E., Glachant J.-M. The econometrics of contracts: An assessment of developments in the empirical literature on contracting. The Economics of Contracts: Theory and Application (2002) (Cambridge, UK)273–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masten S., Meehan J., Snyder E. The costs of organization. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1991) 7:1–25Google Scholar
• Mayer K. J. Transactional alignment and project performance: Evidence from information technology. (2000) . Working paper, Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
• Mayer K. J., Nickerson J. Antecedents and performance implications of contracting for knowledge workers: Evidence from information technology services. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(3):225–242Link, Google Scholar
• Ménard C., Saussier S., Brousseau E., Glachant J.-M. Contractual choice and performance: The case of water supply in France. The Economics of Contracts (2002) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 440–462Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson J. A., Silverman B. S. Why firms want to organize efficiently and what keeps them from doing so: Inappropriate governance, performance, and adaptation in a deregulated industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(3):433–465Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson J. A., Zenger T. A knowledge-based theory of governance choice: The problem-solving approach. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(6):617–632Link, Google Scholar
• Novak S., Eppinger S. Sourcing by design: Product complexity and the supply chain. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):189–204Link, Google Scholar
• Novak S., Stern S. Complementarity among vertical integration decisions: Evidence from automobile product development. Management Sci. (2008) . ePub ahead of print November 24, http://mansci.journal.informs.org/cgi/content/abstract/mnsc.1080.0924v1Google Scholar
• Novak S., Wernerfelt B. The design of industry. (2007) . Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
• Poppo L., Zenger T. Testing alternative theories of the firm: Transaction cost, knowledge-based, and measurement explanations for make-or-buy decisions in information Services. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:853–877Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poppo L., Zenger T. Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management J. (2002) 23(8):707–725Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sampson R. C. The cost of misaligned governance in R&D alliances. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (2004) 20:484–526Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shelanski H., Klein P. Empirical research in transaction cost economics: A review and assessment. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1995) 11:335–361Google Scholar
• Silverman B. S., Nickerson J. A., Freeman J. Profitability, transactional alignment, and organizational mortality in the U.S. trucking industry. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:31–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tadelis S. Complexity, flexibility and the make-or-buy decision. Amer. Econom. Rev., Papers Proc. (2002) 92(2):433–437Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whinston M. D. Assessing the property rights and transaction-cost theories of firm scope. Amer. Econom. Rev., Papers Proc. (2001) 91(2):184–188Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36(2):269–296Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J. M. On two stage least squares estimation of the average treatment effect in a random coefficient model. Econom. Lett. (1997) 56(2):129–133Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yvrande-Billon A., Ménard C. Institutional constraints and organizational changes: The case of the British rail reform. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2005) 56(4):675–699Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yvrande-Billon A., Saussier S., James H. Do organization choices matter? Assessing the importance of governance through performance comparisons. New Ideas in Contracting and Organizational Researches (2005) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) 71–87Google Scholar