R&D/Returns Causality: Absorptive Capacity or Organizational IQ

References

• Adams J. D., Jaffe A. B. Bounding the effects of R&D: An investigation using matched establishment-firm data. RAND J. Econom. (1996) 27:700–721Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ameniya T. A note on a random coefficients model. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1978) 19(3):793–796Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow K. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (1962) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campisi D., Mancuso P., Nastasi A. R&D competition, absorptive capacity, and market shares. J. Econom. (2001) 73(1):57–80Google Scholar
• Cohen W., Levinthal D. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Econom. J. (1989) 99:569–596Google Scholar
• Cohen W., Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Nelson R. R., Walsh J. P. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). (2000) . NBER Working Paper 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Eeckhout J., Jovanovic B. Knowledge spillovers and inequality. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92:1290–1307Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grunfeld L. A. Meet me halfway but don't rush: Absorptive capacity and strategic R&D investment revisited. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2003) 21:1091–1109Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R., Cockburn I. Scale, scope, and spillovers: Determinants of research productivity in the pharmaceutical industry. RAND J. Econom. (1996) 27(1):32–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe A. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76:984–1001Google Scholar
• Jovanovic B., MacDonald G. Competitive diffusion. J. Political Econom. (1994) 102:24–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jovanovic B., Rob R. The growth and diffusion of knowledge. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1989) 56:569–582Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klepper S. Exit, entry, growth and innovation over the product life cycle. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1996) 86:562–583Google Scholar
• Knott A. M., Posen H. E. Firm R&D behavior and evolving technology in established industries. Organ. Sci. (2008) . ePub ahead of print, March 20, http://orgsci.journal.informs.org/cgi/content/abstract/orsc.1070.0332v1Google Scholar
• Knott A. M., Bryce D. J., Posen H. E. On strategic accumulation of intangible assets. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(2):192–207Link, Google Scholar
• Levin R., Reiss P., Griliches Z. Test of a Schumpeterian model of R&D and market structure. R&D, Patents and Productivity (1984) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 175–208Google Scholar
• Martin S. Spillovers, appropriability and R&D. J. Econom. (2002) 75(1):1–32Google Scholar
• McGahan A., Porter M. How much does industry matter, really? Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(S1):15–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R., Winter S.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Rumelt R. How much does industry matter? Strategic Management J. (1991) 12:167–185Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence A. M. Cost reduction, competition and industrial performance. Econometrica (1984) 52:101–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swamy P., Tavlas G. Random coefficient models: Theory and applications. J. Econom. Surveys (1995) 9(2):165–196Crossref, Google Scholar