An Investigation of Time Inconsistency

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0942

References

  • Ahlbrecht M., Weber M. An empirical study on intertemporal decision making under risk. Management Sci. (1997) 43(6):813–826LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ainslie G. Impulse control in pigeons. J. Experiment. Anal. Behav. (1974) 21:485–489CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ainslie G. Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psych. Bull. (1975) 82(4):463–496CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ainslie G., Haendel V., Gottheil E., Durley K., Skodola T., Waxman H. The motives of the will. Etiologic Aspects of Alcohol and Drug Abuse (1983) (Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL) 119–140Google Scholar
  • Attema A. E., Bleichrodt H., Rohde K. I. M., Wakker P. P. Time-tradeoff sequences for quantifying and visualising the degree of time inconsistency, using only pencil and paper. (2006) . Working paper, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  • Baron J. Can we use human judgments to determine the discount rate? Risk Anal. (2000) 20(6):861–868CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benzion U., Rapoport A., Yagil J. Discount rates inferred from decisions: An experimental study. Management Sci. (1989) 35(3):270–284LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Coller M., Williams M. B. Eliciting individual discount rates. Experiment. Econom. (1999) 2(2):107–127CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coller M., Harrison G. W., Rutström E. E. Are discount rates constant? Reconciling theory and observation. (2003) . Working paper, University of Central Florida, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  • Fishburn P. C., Rubinstein A. Time preference. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1982) 23(3):677–694CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher I.The Theory of Interest (1930) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Frederick S., Loewenstein G. F., O'Donoghue T. Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. J. Econom. Literature (2002) 40(2):351–401CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gerber A., Rohde K. I. M. Anomalies in intertemporal choice? (2007) . Working Paper 378, National Centre of Competence in Research, Financial Valuation and Risk Management, ZurichCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Green L., Myerson J. Exponential versus hyperbolic discounting of delayed outcomes: Risk and waiting time. Amer. Zoologist (1996) 36(4):496–505CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Green L., Myerson J. A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psych. Bull. (2004) 130(5):769–792CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Green L., Fristoe N., Myerson J. Temporal discounting and preference reversals in choice between delayed outcomes. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. (1994) 1(3):383–389CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Green L., Fisher E. B., Perlow S., Sherman L. Preference reversal and self control: Choice as a function of reward amount and delay. Behav. Anal. Lett. (1981) 1(1):43–51Google Scholar
  • Harris C., Laibson D. Instantaneous gratification. (2004) . Working paper, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  • Hoch S. J., Loewenstein G. F. Time-inconsistent preferences and consumer self-control. J. Consumer Res. (1991) 17(4):492–507CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holcomb J. H., Nelson P. S. Another experimental look at individual time preference. Rationality Soc. (1992) 4(2):199–220CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keren G., Roelofsma P. Immediacy and certainty in intertemporal choice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1995) 63(3):287–297CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirby K. N., Herrnstein R. J. Preference reversals due to myopic discounting of delayed reward. Psych. Sci. (1995) 6(2):83–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirby K. N., Marakovic N. N. Modeling myopic decisions: Evidence for hyperbolic delay-discounting within subjects and amounts. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1995) 64(1):22–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koopmans T. C. Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica (1960) 28(2):287–309CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loewenstein G. F. Anticipation and the valuation of delayed consumption. Econom. J. (1987) 97(387):666–684CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loewenstein G. F., Prelec D. Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation. Quart. J. Econom. (1992) 107(2):573–597CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mazur J. E., Commons M. L., Mazur J. E., Nevin J. A., Rachlin H. An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. Quantitative Analyses of Behavior: The Effect of Delay and Intervening Events on Reinforcement Value (1987) 5(Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 55–73Google Scholar
  • Rachlin H., Green L. Commitment, choice, and self-control. J. Experiment. Anal. Behav. (1972) 17(1):15–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Read D. Is time-discounting hyperbolic or subadditive? J. Risk Uncertainty (2001) 23(1):5–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Read D., Koehler D., Harvey N. Intertemporal choice. The Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (2004) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) 424–443CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Read D., Roelofsma P. H. M. P. Subadditive versus hyperbolic discounting: A comparison of choice and matching. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2003) 91(2):140–153CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Read D., van Leeuwen B. Predicting hunger: The effects of appetite and delay on choice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1998) 76(2):189–205CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Read D., Loewenstein G., Kalyanaraman S. Mixing virtue and vice: Combining the immediacy effect and the diversification heuristic. J. Behav. Decision Making (1999) 12(4):257–273CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Samuelson P. A. A note on measurement of utility. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1937) 4(2):155–161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scholten M., Read D. Discounting by intervals: A generalized model of intertemporal choice. Management Sci. (2006) 52(9):1424–1436LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stevenson M. K. A discounting model for decisions with delayed positive and negative outcomes. J. Experiment. Psych. (1986) 115(2):131–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strotz R. H. Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1955) 23(3):165–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Takeuchi K. When does the future really start? Non-monotonic time preference. (2007) . Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler R. Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Econom. Lett. (1981) 8(3):201–207CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (1992) 5(4):297–323CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.