Supply Disruptions, Asymmetric Information, and a Backup Production Option

References

• Anupindi R., Akella R. Diversification under supply uncertainty. Management Sci. (1993) 39(8):944–963Link, Google Scholar
• Babich V. Vulnerable options in supply chains: Effects of supplier competition. Naval Res. Logist. (2006) 53(7):656–673Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babich V., Burnetas A. N., Ritchken P. H. Competition and diversification effects in supply chains with supplier default risk. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2007) 9(2):123–146Link, Google Scholar
• Babich V., Aydin G., Brunet P.-Y., Keppo J., Saigal R. Risk, financing, and the optimal number of suppliers. (2005) . Working paper. Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
• Baiman S., Fischer P. E., Rajan M. V. Information, contracting, and quality costs. Management Sci. (2000) 46(6):776–789Link, Google Scholar
• Beil D., Wein L. An inverse-optimization-based auction mechanism to support a multiattribute RFQ process. Management Sci. (2003) 49(11):1529–1545Link, Google Scholar
• Che Y.-K. Design competition through multidimensional auctions. RAND J. Econom. (1993) 24(4):668–680Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen R., Roundy R., Zhang R., Janakiraman G. Efficient auction mechanisms for supply chain procurement. Management Sci. (2005) 51(3):467–482Link, Google Scholar
• Chopra S., Sodhi M. Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Management Rev. (2004) 46(1):53–61Google Scholar
• Corbett C. Stochastic inventory systems in a supply chain with asymmetric information: Cycle stocks, safety stocks, and consignment stock. Oper. Res. (2001) 49(4):487–500Link, Google Scholar
• Corbett C., Zhou D., Tang C. Designing supply contracts: Contract type and information asymmetry. Management Sci. (2004) 50(4):550–559Link, Google Scholar
• Corbin A. L.Corbin on Contracts (2007) (Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., Albany, NY) Google Scholar
• Dasgupta P., Hammond P., Maskin E. The implementation of social choice rules: Some general results on incentive compatibility. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1979) 46(2):185–216Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta S., Spulber D. F. Managing procurement auctions. Inform. Econom. Policy (1990) 4(1):5–29Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deng S.-J., Elmaghraby W. Supplier selection via tournaments. Production Oper. Management (2005) 14(2):252–268Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elmaghraby W., Simchi-Levi D., Wu S., Shen Z. Auctions and pricing in e-marketplaces. Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis: Modeling in the E-Business Era (2004) (Springer Science + Business Media, New York) . Chap. 6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D., Tirole J.Game Theory (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Gurnani H., Shi M. A bargaining model for a first-time interaction under asymmetric beliefs of supply reliability. Management Sci. (2006) 52(6):865–880Link, Google Scholar
• Hendricks K. B., Singhal V. R. The effect of supply chain glitches on shareholder wealth. J. Management (2003) 21:501–522Google Scholar
• Hendricks K. B., Singhal V. R. Association between supply chain glitches and operating performance. Management Sci. (2005a) 51(5):695–711Link, Google Scholar
• Hendricks K. B., Singhal V. R. An empirical analysis of the effect of supply chain disruptions on long-run stock price performance and equity risk of the firm. Production Oper. Management (2005b) 14(1):35–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kostamis D., Duenyas I. Purchasing under asymmetric demand and cost information. (2007) . Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
• Kostamis D., Beil D. R., Duenyas I. Sealed-bid versus open total-cost procurement auctions: Should the buyer reveal suppliers' quality? (2006) . Working paper, University of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
• Kouvelis P., Milner J. M. Supply chain capacity and outsourcing decisions: The dynamic interplay of demand and supply uncertainty. IIE Trans. (2002) 34:717–728Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laffont J.-J., Martimort D.The Theory of Incentives (2002) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim W. S. Producer-supplier contracts with incomplete information. Management Sci. (2001) 47(5):709–715Link, Google Scholar
• Lovejoy W. S. Optimal mechanisms with finite agent types. Management Sci. (2006) 52(5):788–803Link, Google Scholar
• Maskin E., Tirole J. The principal-agent relationship with an informed principal: The case of private values. Econometrica (1990) 58(2):379–409Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myers R. Food fights. CFO Magazine (2007) June 1Google Scholar
• Myerson R. B. Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem. Econometrica (1979) 47(1):61–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myerson R. B. Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. (1981) 6(1):58–73Link, Google Scholar
• Nishiguchi T., Beaudet A. The Toyota group and the Aisin fire. Sloan Management Rev. (1998) 40(1):49–59Google Scholar
• Plambeck E., Taylor T. Implications of breach remedy and renegotiation for design of supply contracts. Management Sci. (2007) 53(12):1859–1871Link, Google Scholar
• Rob R. The design of procurement contracts. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76(3):378–389Google Scholar
• Serel D. A., Dada M., Moskowitz H. Sourcing decisions with capacity reservation contracts. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2001) 131:635–648Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sheffi Y.The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage (2005) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Tang C. S. Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. Internat. J. Logist.: Res. Appl. (2006) 9(1):33–45Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tomlin B. Selecting a disruption-management strategy for short life-cycle products: Diversification, contingent sourcing and demand management. (2005) . Working paper, University of North Carolina, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
• Tomlin B. Impact of supply learning when suppliers are unreliable. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2008) . ePub ahead of print May 7, http://msom.journal.informs.org/cgi/content/abstract/msom.1070.0206v1Google Scholar
• Tomlin B., Wang Y. On the value of mix flexibility and dual sourcing in unreliable newsvendor networks. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2005) 7(1):37–57Link, Google Scholar
• Van Mieghem J. A. Capacity management, investment, and hedging: Review and recent developments. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2003) 5(4):269–302Link, Google Scholar
• Wan Z., Beil D. R. RFQ auctions with supplier qualification screening. Oper. Res. (2009) . ForthcomingLink, Google Scholar