Scanning the Commons? Evidence on the Benefits to Startups Participating in Open Standards Development

References

• Abbate J.Inventing the Internet (1999) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Allen T. J.Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information within the R&D Organizations (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Baldwin C., Clark K. Architectural innovation and dynamic competition: The smaller “footprint” strategy. (2006) . Working Paper 07-014, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Baum J. A. C., Oliver C. Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36(2):187–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonaccorsi A., Giannangeli S., Rossi C. Entry strategies under competing standards: Hybrid business models in the open source software industry. Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):1085–1098Link, Google Scholar
• Box-Steffensmeier J. M., Jones B. S.Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists (2004) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradner S. The Internet standards process—Revision 3. (1996) . RFC 2026, The Internet Engineering Task Force, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2026.txtGoogle Scholar
• Bradner S. The IETF working group guidelines and procedures. (1998) . RFC 2418, The Internet Engineering Task Force, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2418.txtGoogle Scholar
• Bradner S., DiBona C., Ockman S., Stone M. The Internet engineering task force. Open Sources: Voices from the Revolution. (1999) (O'Reilly, Sebastopol, CA) 47–52Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H.Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (2003) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Corbett C. J., Montes-Sancho M. J., Kirsch D. A. The financial impact of ISO 9000 certification in the United States: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. (2005) 51(7):1046–1059Link, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L. Appropriation and appropriability in open source software. Internat. J. Innovation Management (2005) 9(3):259–285Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L., Wallin M. W. A man on the inside: Unlocking communities as complementary assets. Res. Policy (2006) 35(8):1243–1259Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckhardt J. T., Shane S. A. Opportunities and entrepreneurship. J. Management (2003) 29(3):333–349Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L., Waguespack D. Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(2):165–180Link, Google Scholar
• Gandal N., Gantman N., Genesove D. Intellectual property and the standardization committee participation in the U.S. modem industry. (2004) . Working paper, Tel Aviv University, Tel AvivGoogle Scholar
• Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (1993) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
• Gruber M., Henkel J. New ventures based on open innovation—An empirical analysis of startup firms in embedded Linux. Internat. J. Tech. Management (2006) 33(4):356–372Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R., Higgins M. C. Which ties matter when? The contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(2):127–144Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris S. The Tao of the IETF—A novice's guide to the Internet Engineering Task Force. (2001) . RFC 3160, The Internet Engineering Task Force, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3160.txtGoogle Scholar
• Henkel J. Selective revealing in open innovation processes: The case of embedded Linux. Res. Policy (2006) 35(7):953–969Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hochberg Y. V., Ljungqvist A., Lu Y. Whom you know matters: Venture capital networks and investment performance. J. Finance (2007) 62(1):251–301Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman P., Bradner S. Defining the IETF. (2002) . RFC 3233, The Internet Engineering Task Force, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3233.txtGoogle Scholar
• Hsu D. What do entrepreneurs pay for venture capital affiliation? J. Finance (2004) 61(4):1805–1844Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen L. B., Frederiksen L. Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(1):45–63Link, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen L. B., Molin M. J. Consumers as co-developers: Learning and innovation outside the firm. Tech. Anal. Strategic Management (2003) 15(3):363–383Crossref, Google Scholar
• King A. A., Lenox M. J., Terlaak A. The strategic use of decentralized institutions: Exploring certification with the ISO 14001 management standard. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(6):1091–1106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakhani K. R., von Hippel E. How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Res. Policy (2003) 32(6):923–943Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laursen K., Salter A. Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management J. (2006) 27(2):131–150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee G. K., Cole R. E. From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the Linux kernel development. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(6):633–649Link, Google Scholar
• Lerner J., Tirole J. Some simple economics of open source. J. Indust. Econom. (2002) 50(2):197–234Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J., Tirole J. The economics of technology sharing: Open source and beyond. J. Econom. Perspectives (2005) 19(2):99–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J., Tirole J. A model of forum shopping. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2006) 96(4):1091–1113Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery D. C., Simcoe T. Is the Internet a U.S. invention? An economic and technological history of computer networking. Res. Policy (2002) 31(8–9):1369–1387Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olsen M.The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (1965) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• O'Reilly T., DiBona C., Cooper D., Stone M. The open source paradigm shift. Open Sources 2.0 (2006) (O'Reilly, Sebastopol, CA) 253–270Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M. A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. (1993) 98(4):829–872Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell W. W., Koput K. W., Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41(1):116–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H. The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:29–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raymond E. Conventions at light speed: What hackers can learn from SF fandom. (2000) . http://www.catb.org/∼esr/writings/sfshows/Google Scholar
• Roberts J. A., Hann I. H., Slaughter S. A. Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the Apache projects. Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):984–999Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L., Metiu A., George V. P. From the bottom up? Technical committee activity and alliance formation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(4):748–772Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rysman M., Simcoe T. Patents and the performance of voluntary standard-setting organizations. Management Sci. (2008) 54(11):1920–1934Link, Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld D. Partial residuals for the proportional hazards regression model. Biometrika (1982) 69:239–241Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah S. K. Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):1000–1014Link, Google Scholar
• Shane S. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(4):448–469Link, Google Scholar
• Simcoe T. Standard setting committees. (2006) . Working paper, University of Toronto, TorontoGoogle Scholar
• Spence A.Market Signaling (1974) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Spencer J. W. Firms' knowledge-sharing strategies in the global innovation system: Empirical evidence from the flat panel display industry. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(3):217–233Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart T. E., Hoang H., Hybels R. C. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(2):315–349Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E. Economics of product development by users: The impact of “sticky” local information. Management Sci. (1998) 44(5):629–644Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E., Katz R. Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management Sci. (2002) 48(7):821–833Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E., von Krogh G. Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(2):209–223Link, Google Scholar
• von Krogh G., Spaeth S., Lakhani K. R. Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Res. Policy (2003) 32(7):1217–1241Crossref, Google Scholar
• West J. How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Res. Policy (2003) 32(7):1259–1285Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolridge J. M.Econometric Analysis of Cross-Section and Panel Data (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar