Economic Analysis of Simulation Selection Problems

References

• Bertsekas D. P., Shreve S. E.Stochastic Optimal Control: The Discrete-Time Case (1996) (Athena Scientific, Nashua, NH) Google Scholar
• Blackwell D. Discounted dynamic programming. Ann. Math. Statist. (1965) 36:226–235Crossref, Google Scholar
• Branke J., Chick S. E., Schmidt C. Selecting a selection procedure. Management Sci. (2007) 53(12):1916–1932Link, Google Scholar
• Breakwell J., Chernoff H. Sequential tests for the mean of a normal distribution II (large t). Ann. Math. Statist. (1964) 35:162–163Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brealey R. A., Myers S. C.Principles of Corporate Finance (2001) 6th ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Brezzi M., Lai T. L. Optimal learning and experimentation in bandit problems. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (2002) 27:87–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butler J., Morrice D. J., Mullarkey P. W. A multiple attribute utility theory approach to ranking and selection. Management Sci. (2001) 47(6):800–816Link, Google Scholar
• Chang F., Lai T. L. Optimal stopping and dynamic allocation. Adv. Appl. Probab. (1987) 19:829–853Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chernoff H. Sequential tests for the mean of a normal distribution. Proc. Fourth Berkeley Sympos. Math. Statist. Probab. (1961) 1(University of California Press, Berkeley) 79–91Google Scholar
• Chernoff H. Sequential tests for the mean of a normal distribution III (small t). Ann. Math. Statist. (1965) 36:28–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chick S. E., Inoue K. New two-stage and sequential procedures for selecting the best simulated system. Oper. Res. (2001) 49(5):732–743Link, Google Scholar
• Fox B. L., Glynn P. W. Simulating discounted costs. Management Sci. (1989) 35(11):1297–1315Link, Google Scholar
• Gittins J. C. Bandit problems and dynamic allocation indices. J. Royal Statist. Soc. B (1979) 41:148–177Google Scholar
• Gittins J. C.Multi-Armed Bandit Allocation Indices (1989) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Glazebrook K. D. Stoppable families of alternative bandit processes. J. Appl. Probab. (1979) 16:843–854Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta S. S., Miescke K. J. Bayesian look ahead one-stage sampling allocations for selecting the best population. J. Statist. Planning Inference (1996) 54:229–244Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong L. J., Nelson B. L. The tradeoff between sampling and switching: New sequential procedures for indifference-zone selection. IIE Trans. (2005) 37:623–634Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim S.-H., Nelson B. L. On the asymptotic validity of fully sequential selection procedures for steady-state simulation. Oper. Res. (2006a) 54(3):475–488Link, Google Scholar
• Kim S.-H., Nelson B. L., Henderson S. G., Nelson B. L. Selecting the best system. Handbook in Operations Research and Management Science: Simulation (2006b) (Elsevier, Boston) 501–534Chap. 17Google Scholar
• Law A. M., Kelton W. D.Simulation Modeling & Analysis (2000) 3rd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Nelson B. L., Goldsman D. Comparisons with a standard in simulation experiments. Management Sci. (2001) 47(3):449–463Link, Google Scholar
• Whittle P. Multi-armed bandits and the Gittins index. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B (1980) 42:143–149Google Scholar