Spillover Asymmetry and Why It Matters

References

• Abramowitz M. Catching up, forging ahead and falling behind. J. Economic History (1986) 46:385–406Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acs Z., Audretsch D., Feldman M. R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1994) 76:336–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams J. D., Jaffe A. B. Bounding the effects of R&D: An investigation using matched establishment-firm data. RAND J. Econom. (1996) 27:700–721Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aghion P., Harris C., Howitt P., Vickers J. Competition, imitation and growth with step-by-step innovation. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2001) 68:467–492Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aigner D., Lovell A. K., Schmidt P. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J. Econometrics (1977) 6:21–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akhavein J., Frame W. S., White L. J. The diffusion of financial innovations: An examination of the adoption of small business credit scoring by large banking organizations. J. Bus. (2005) 78(2):577–596Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M., Bond S. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1991) 58:277–297Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow K. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (1962) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Batiz-Lazo B., Wood D. Information technology innovations and commercial banking: A review and appraisal from an historical perspective. (2002) . Working paper, Economic History 0211002, Econ WPAGoogle Scholar
• Baumol W., Blackman S., Wolff E.Productivity and American Leadership: The Long View (1989) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Berger A. N., DeYoung R. Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial banks. J. Banking Finance (1997) 21(6):849–870Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger A. N., Humphrey D. B. Output measurement in the service sectors. Measurement and Efficiency Issues in Commercial Banking (1992) 56(University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 245–279National Bureau of Economic Research Studies in Income and WealthGoogle Scholar
• Berger A., Hancock D., Humphrey D. Bank efficiency derived from the profit function. J. Banking Finance (1993) 17:317–347Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black D., Henderson V. A theory of urban growth. J. Political Econom. (1999) 2:252–284Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bofondi M., Lotti F. Innovation in the retail banking industry: The diffusion of credit scoring. Rev. Indust. Organ. (2006) 28(4):343–358Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bromiley P. Testing a causal model of corporate risk and performance. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34(1):37–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cebenoyan A., Papaioannou G., Travlos N. Foreign takeover activity in the United States and wealth effects for target firm shareholders. Financial Management (1992) 21:58–68Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cockburn I., Henderson R., Stern S. Untangling the origins of competitive advantage. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:1123–1145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W., Levin R., Schmalensee R., Willig R. Innovation and market structure. Handbook of Industrial Organization (1989) (Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, Holland) 1059–1107Google Scholar
• Cohen W., Nelson R., Walsh J. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). (2000) . NBER Working Paper 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert R., March J.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Wiley-Blackwell, London) Google Scholar
• Eeckhout J., Jovanovic B. Knowledge spillovers and inequality. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92:1290–1307Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison G., Glaeser E. Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: A dartboard approach. J. Political Econom. (1997) 105:889–927Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell J. Econom. (1979) 10:92–116Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman G., Helpman E.Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy (1992) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Hannan T., McDowell J. Market concentration and the diffusion of new technology in the banking industry. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1984) 66(4):686–691Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hermalin B., Wallace N. The determinants of efficiency and solvency in savings and loans. RAND J. Econom. (1994) 25:361–381Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holtz-Eakin D., Newey W., Rosen H. Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica (1988) 56:1371–1395Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe A. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76:984–1001Google Scholar
• Jaffe A. Demand and supply influences in R&D intensity and productivity growth. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1988) 70:431–437Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jovanovic B., MacDonald G. Competitive diffusion. J. Political Econom. (1994) 102:24–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jovanovic B., Rob R. The growth and diffusion of knowledge. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1989) 56:569–582Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klepper S. Exit, entry, growth and innovation over the product life cycle. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1996) 86:562–583Google Scholar
• Knott A., Posen H. Is failure good? Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(7):617–641Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knott A., Posen H. Firm R&D behavior and evolving technology in established industries. Organ. Sci. (2008) . ePub ahead of print March 20, http://orgsci.journal.informs.org/cgi/content/abstract/orsc.1070.0332v1Google Scholar
• Krugman P. A model of innovation, technology tansfer and the world distribution of income. J. Political Econom. (1979) 87(21):253–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J. Where does state street lead? A first look at finance patents, 1971–2000. J. Finance (2002) 57:901–930Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin R. Appropriability, R&D spending, and technological performance. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1988) 78(2):424–428Google Scholar
• Levin R., Reiss P., Griliches Z. Tests of a schumpeterian model of R&D and market structure. R&D, Patents and Productivity (1984) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 175–204Google Scholar
• Levin R., Reiss P. Cost-reducing and demand-creating R&D with spillovers. RAND J. Econom. (1988) 19(4):538–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin R., Cohen W., Mowery D. R&D appropriability, opportunity and market structure: New evidence on some schumpeterian hypotheses. Amer. Econom. Rev. Proc. (1985) 75:20–24Google Scholar
• Mansfield E.The Economics of Technological Change (1968) (W.W. Norton, New York) Google Scholar
• Mester L. Efficiency in the savings and loan industry. J. Banking Finance (1993) 17:267–286Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan D. P., Rime B., Strahan P. E. Bank integration and state business cycles. Quart. J. Econom. (2004) 119(4):1555–1584Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R., Winter S.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Nickell S. Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica (1981) 49:1417–1426Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romer P. M. Increasing returns and long-run growth. J. Political Econom. (1986) 94:1002–1037Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L., Almeida P. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. (2003) 49(6):751–766Link, Google Scholar
• Sharma S. Behind the diffusion curve: An analysis of ATM adoption. (1992) . Working Paper 686, UCLA Department of Economics, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
• Spence A. M. Cost reduction, competition and industrial performance. Econometrica (1984) 52:101–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sullivan R., Wang Z. Internet banking: An exploration in technology diffusion and impact. (2005) . Payments System Research Working Paper PSR WP 05-05, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Kansas City, MOGoogle Scholar
• Thompson P. Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: Evidence from inventor- and examiner-added citations. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2006) 88(2):383–388Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheelock D., Wilson P. Evaluating the efficiency of commercial banks: Does our view of what banks do matter? Rev.—Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. (1995) 77:39–52Google Scholar
• Wheelock D., Wilson P. Robust non-parametric quantile estimation of efficiency and productivity change in U.S. commercial banking, 1985–2004. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (2008) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar