Active Feature-Value Acquisition

References

• Blake C. L., Merz C. J. UCI repository of machine learning databases. (1998) . http://www.ics.uci.edu/mlearn/MLRepository.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Cohn D., Atlas L., Ladner R. Improving generalization with active learning. Machine Learn. (1994) 15(2):201–221Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fayyad U. M., Irani K. B., Bajcsy R. Multi-interval discretization of continuous-valued attributes for classification learning. Proc. 13th Internat. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (1993) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco) 1022–1027Google Scholar
• Federov V.Theory of Optimal Experiments (1972) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Freund Y., Seung H. S., Shamir E., Tishby N. Selective sampling using the query by committee algorithm. Machine Learn. (1997) 28(2/3):133–168Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman J. H. On bias, variance, 0/1-loss, and the curse-of-dimensionality. Data Mining Knowledge Discovery (1997) 1(1):55–77Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greiner R., Grove A., Roth D. Learning cost-sensitive active classifiers. Artificial Intelligence (2002) 139(2):137–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hevner A., March S., Park J., Ram S. Design science in information systems research. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(1):75–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang Z. Selectively acquiring ratings for product recommendation. Proc. 9th Internat. Conf. Electronic Commerce (ICEC '07) (2007) (ACM, New York) 379–388Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen D. D., Cohen P. R. Multiple comparisons in induction algorithms. Machine Learn. (2000) 38(3):309–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• John G. H., Kohavi R., Pfleger K., Cohen W. W., Hirsh H. Irrelevant features and the subset selection problem. Proc. 11th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (ICML-94) (1994) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco) 121–129Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley P. Crafting papers on machine learning. Proc. 17th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (ICML-2000) (2000) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco) 1207–1216Google Scholar
• Lizotte D., Madani O., Greiner R., Meek C., Kjaerulff U. Budgeted learning of Naive-Bayes classifiers. Proc. 19th Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence (UAI-2003) (2003) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco) Google Scholar
• Mannino M. V., Mookerjee V. S. Optimizing expert systems: Heuristics for efficiently generating low cost information acquisition strategies. Informs J. Comput. (1999) 11(3):278–291Link, Google Scholar
• McCardle K. Information acquisition and the adoption of new technology. Management Sci. (1985) 31(11):1372–1389Link, Google Scholar
• Melville P., Saar-Tsechansky M., Provost F., Mooney R. Active feature-value acquisition for classifier induction. Proc. 4th IEEE Internat. Conf. Data Mining (ICDM-04) (2004) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C.) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melville P., Saar-Tsechansky M., Provost F., Mooney R. An expected utility approach to active feature-value acquisition. Proc. 5th IEEE Internat. Conf. Data Mining (ICDM-05) (2005) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C.) 745–748Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mookerjee V. S., Mannino M. V. Sequential decision models for expert system optimization. IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Engrg. (1997) 9(5):675–687Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore J. C., Whinston A. B. A model of decision-making with sequential information-acquisition (part 1). Decision Support Systems (1986) 2(4):285–307Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore J. C., Whinston A. B. A model of decision-making with sequential information-acquisition (part 2). Decision Support Systems (1987) 3(1):47–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quinlan J. R.C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning (1993) (Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, CA) Google Scholar
• Robbins H. Some aspects of the sequential design of experiments. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (1952) 55:527–535Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roy N., McCallum A., Brodley C. E., Danyluk A. P. Toward optimal active learning through sampling estimation of error reduction. Proc. 18th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (ICML-2001) (2001) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco) 441–448Google Scholar
• Saar-Tsechansky M., Provost F. Active sampling for class probability estimation and ranking. Machine Learn. (2004) 54:153–178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saar-Tsechansky M., Provost F. Handling missing values when applying classification models. J. Machine Learn. Res. (2007) 8:1623–1657Google Scholar
• Siegel S., Fouraker L. E.Bargaining and Group Decision-Making: Experiments in Bilateral Monopoly (1960) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Simon H. A., Lea G., Gregg L. W. Problem solving and rule induction: A unified view. Knowledge and Cognition (1974) (Erlbaum, Potomac, MD) . Chap. 5Google Scholar
• Tan M., Schlimmer J. C., Dietterich T., Swartout W. Two case studies in cost-sensitive concept acquisition. Proc. 8th National Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-90) (1990) (Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA) 854–860Google Scholar
• Turney P. D., Dietterich T., Margineantu D., Provost F., Turney P. Types of cost in inductive concept learning. Proc. Workshop on Cost-Sensitive Learn. 17th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (2000) Stanford, CA:15–21Google Scholar
• Vapnik V. N.Statistical Learning Theory (1998) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Veeramachaneni S., Olivetti E., Avesani P., Cohen W. W., Moore A. Active sampling for detecting irrelevant features. Proc. 23rd Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (ICML-2006) (2006) Pittsburgh:961–968Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams D., Liao X., Carin L. Active data acquisition with incomplete data. (2005) . Technical report, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
• Witten I. H., Frank E.Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques with Java Implementations (1999) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco) Google Scholar
• Zheng Z., Padmanabhan B., Zhong N., Yu P. S. On active learning for data acquisition. Proc. IEEE Internat. Conf. Data Mining (ICDM-2002) (2002) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C.) 562–569Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zheng Z., Padmanabhan B. Selectively acquiring customer information: A new data acquisition problem and an active learning based solution. Management Sci. (2006) 52(5):697–712Link, Google Scholar