What Fraction of Stock Option Grants to Top Executives Have Been Backdated or Manipulated?
Published Online:28 Jan 2009https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0958
References
- CEO stock option awards and the timing of corporate voluntary disclosures. J. Accounting Econom. (2000) 29:73–100Crossref, Google Scholar
- Taking the heat for stock options: Executive grants under investigation. Bloomberg News (2006) May 26Google Scholar
- The discovery and reporting of internal control deficiencies prior to SOX-mandated audits. J. Accounting Econom. (2007) 44:166–192Crossref, Google Scholar
- The determinants of board size and composition: An empirical analysis. J. Financial Econom. (2007) 85:66–101Crossref, Google Scholar
- Altering the terms of executive stock options. J. Financial Econom. (2000) 57:103–128Crossref, Google Scholar
- Executive stock option exercises: Good timing or backdating. (2007) . Working paper, Drexel University, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- The timing of option repricing. J. Financial Econom. (2004) 59:1651–1676Google Scholar
- The “repricing” of executive stock options. J. Financial Econom. (2000) 57:129–154Crossref, Google Scholar
- Stock price decreases prior to executive stock option grants. J. Corporate Finance (2001) 7:53–76Crossref, Google Scholar
- Executive option repricing, internal governance mechanisms, and management turnover. J. Financial Econom. (2003) 69:153–189Crossref, Google Scholar
- Strategic timing and backdating of executive stock option exercises: Before and after the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. (2007) . Working paper, University of Delaware, Newark, DEGoogle Scholar
- The timing of CEO stock option grants: Scheduled versus unscheduled awards. (2005a) . Working paper, University of Iowa, Iowa CityGoogle Scholar
- The effect of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on the timing manipulation of CEO stock option awards. (2005b) . Working paper, University of Iowa, Iowa CityCrossref, Google Scholar
- Auditor size and audit quality. J. Accounting Econom. (1981) 3:183–200Crossref, Google Scholar
- Taxes and the backdating of stock option exercise dates. (2007) . Working paper, University of Rochester, Rochester, NYGoogle Scholar
- U.S. SEC said eyeing auditors in stock option probe. Reuters News (2006) June 7Google Scholar
- Industry costs of equity. J. Financial Econom. (1997) 43:153–193Crossref, Google Scholar
- The perfect payday: Some CEOs reap millions by landing stock options when they are most valuable. Luck—Or something else? Wall Street Journal (2006) March 18):A1Google Scholar
- Job site monster joins companies under options review. Reuters News (2006) June 12Google Scholar
- Corporate governance and equity prices. Quart. J. Econom. (2003) 118:107–155Crossref, Google Scholar
- How stockholders view option repricing: Evidence from “6 and 1” option exchanges. (2006) . Working paper, Bentley College, Waltham, MAGoogle Scholar
- Does backdating explain the stock price pattern around executive stock option grants? J. Financial Econom. (2007) 83:271–295Crossref, Google Scholar
- On the use (and abuse) of stock option grants. Financial Analysts J. (2007) 63:17–27Crossref, Google Scholar
- Investor's Business Daily Business briefs/in brief. (2006) May 22):A2Google Scholar
- On the timing of CEO stock option awards. Management Sci. (2005) 51:802–812Link, Google Scholar
- The determinants of board structure. J. Financial Econom. (2008) 87:308–328Crossref, Google Scholar
- Thumbs on the scale: A new executive-pay scandal comes to light. Forbes (2005) November 28):56Google Scholar
- The dating game: Do managers designate option grant dates to increase their compensation? Rev. Financial Stud. (2008) 21:1907–1945Crossref, Google Scholar
- Backdating woes beg the question of auditors' role. Wall Street Journal (2006a) June 23):C1Google Scholar
- Moving the market: Micrel says Deloitte approved options-pricing plan. Wall Street Journal (2006b) June 1):C3Google Scholar
- Wall Street Journal Online Options scorecard. (2006) OctoberGoogle Scholar
- Good timing: CEO stock option awards and company news announcements. J. Finance (1997) 52:449–476Crossref, Google Scholar
- Deduction ad absurdum: CEOs donating their own stock to their own family foundations. (2008) . Working paper, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar

