Dynamic Cost Reduction Through Process Improvement in Assembly Networks

References

• Andersson B. GM's global supply footprint. (2006) Presentation, The supplier industry in transition: The new geography of auto productionApril 19Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, DetroitGoogle Scholar
• Baily M., Farrell D. Increasing global competition and labor productivity: Lessons from the U.S. auto industry. (2006) Presentation, The supplier industry in transition: The new geography of auto productionApril 18Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, DetroitGoogle Scholar
• Baron D., Besanko D. Regulation and information in a continuing relationship. Inform. Econom. Policy (1984) 1:267–302Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein F., Federgruen A. Dynamic inventory and pricing models for competing retailers. Naval Res. Logist. (2004) 51(2):258–274Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bijmolt T., Van Heerde H., Pieters R. New empirical generalizations on the determinants of price elasticity. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42:141–156Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown T. Ford's new purchasing strategy. (2006) Presentation, The supplier industry in transition: The new geography of auto productionApril 18Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, DetroitGoogle Scholar
• Carr S., Karmarkar U. Competition in multiechelon assembly supply chains. Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):45–59Link, Google Scholar
• Corbett C., Karmarkar U. Competition and structure in serial supply chains. Management Sci. (2001) 47(7):966–978Link, Google Scholar
• Chappell L. Toyota: Slash—but we'll help. Automotive News (2002) 77(6002):4Google Scholar
• Chozick A. A key strategy of Japan's car makers backfires. Wall Street Journal (2007) July 20):B.1Google Scholar
• Clanton. GM puts squeeze on suppliers. The Detroit News (2005) September 9Google Scholar
• Curtat L. O. Markov equilibria of stochastic games with complementarities. Games Econom. Behav. (1996) 17:177–199Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J., Hatch N. Relation-specific capabilities and barriers to knowledge transfers: Creating advantage through network relationships. Strategic Management J. (2006) 27(8):701–719Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elmaghraby W. Supply contract competition and sourcing policies. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2000) 2(4):350–371Link, Google Scholar
• Elmaghraby W., Oh S. Procurement auctions and eroding price contracts in the presence of learning by doing. (2004) . Working paper, University of Maryland, College ParkGoogle Scholar
• Fine C. Quality improvement and learning in productive systems. Management Sci. (1986) 32(10):1301–1315Link, Google Scholar
• Fine C. A quality control model with learning effects. Oper. Res. (1988) 36(3):437–444Link, Google Scholar
• Fine C., Porteus E. Dynamic process improvement. Oper. Res. (1989) 37(4):580–591Link, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D., Tirole J.Game Theory (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Gilbert S., Cvsa V. Strategic supply chain contracting to stimulate downstream process innovation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2003) 150(3):617–639Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert S. M., Xia Y., Yu G. Strategic outsourcing for competing OEMs that face cost reduction opportunities. IIE Trans. (2006) 38(11):903–915Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman S., Hart O. The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. J. Political Econom. (1986) 94(4):691–719Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta S. Channel structure with knowledge spillovers. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(2):247–261Link, Google Scholar
• Gupta S., Loulou R. Process innovation, product differentiation, and channel structure: Strategic incentives in a duopoly. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(4):301–316Link, Google Scholar
• Hatch N., Mowery D. Process innovation and learning by doing in semiconductor manufacturing. Management Sci. (1998) 44(11):1461–1477Link, Google Scholar
• Heese H., Swaminathan J. Product line design with component commonality and cost-reduction effort. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2006) 8(2):206–219Link, Google Scholar
• Iyer A., Schwarz L., Zenios S. A principal-agent model for product specification and production. Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):106–119Link, Google Scholar
• Kim B. Coordinating an innovation in supply chain management. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2000) 123:568–584Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laffont J., Tirole J.A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation (1993) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Lewis T., Yildirim H. Learning by doing and dynamic regulation. RAND J. Econom. (2002) 33(1):22–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li G., Rajagopalan S. Process improvement, quality and learning effects. Management Sci. (1998) 44(11):1517–1532Link, Google Scholar
• Liu X., Cetinkaya S. The impact of supplier quality and supplier development on contract design. (2005) . Working paper, Texas A&M University, College StationGoogle Scholar
• Mazzola J., McCardle K. The stochastic learning curve: Optimal production in the presence of learning-curve uncertainty. Oper. Res. (1997) 45(3):440–450Link, Google Scholar
• McCracken J., Glader P. Hitting a wall: New Detroit woe: Makers of parts won't cut prices. Wall Street Journal (2007) March 20):A1Google Scholar
• McMillan J. Managing suppliers: Incentive systems in Japanese and U.S. industry. Calif. Management Rev. (1990) 32(4):38–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milligan B. Automakers keep demanding price cuts from suppliers. Purchasing (2000) 128(3):87–89Google Scholar
• Nagarajan M., Bassok Y. A bargaining framework in supply chains (the assembly problem). (2002) . Working paper, University of Southern California, Los AngelesCrossref, Google Scholar
• Serel D., Dada M., Moskowitz H., Plante R. Investing in quality under autonomous and induced learning. IIE Trans. (2003) 35:545–555Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence A. The learning curve and competition. Bell J. Econom. (1981) 12:49–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Talluri K., van Ryzin G.The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management (2004) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Topkis D.Supermodularity and Complementarity (1998) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yelle L. The learning curve: Historical review and comprehensive survey. Decision Sci. (1979) 10:302–328Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao Z., Anand J., Mitchell W. Transferring collective knowledge: Teaching and learning in the Chinese auto industry. Strategic Organ. (2004) 2(2):133–167Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu K., Zhang R., Tsung F. Pushing quality improvement along supply chains. Management Sci. (2007) 53(3):421–436Link, Google Scholar