Quasi-Robust Multiagent Contracts

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0967

References

  • Bergemann D., Morris S. Robust mechanism design. Econometrica (2005) 73:1521–1534CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bergemann D., Morris S. Ex post implementation. Games Econom. Behav. (2008) 63:527–566CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chung K., Ely J. Foundations of dominant strategy mechanisms. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2007) 74:447–476CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cremer J., McLean R. P. Full extraction of the surplus in Bayesian and dominant strategy auctions. Econometrica (1988) 56:1247–1257CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Demski J., Dye R. Risk, return, and moral hazard. J. Accounting Res. (1999) 37:27–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Demski J., Sappington D. Optimal incentive contracts with multiple agents. J. Econom. Theory (1984) 33:152–171CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dutta S., Reichelstein S. Controlling investment decisions: Depreciation and capital charges. Rev. Accounting Stud. (2002) 7:253–281CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evans R. Simple efficient contracts in complex environments. Econometrica (2008) 76:459–491CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glover J., Ijiri Y., Levine C., Liang P. Usefulness lost: Aggregating information with differing levels of verifiability. (2006) . Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  • Laffont J.-J., Tirole J.A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation (1993) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Lopomo G. The English auction is optimal among simple sequential auctions. J. Econom. Theory (1998) 82:144–166CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ma A., Moore J., Turnbull S. Stopping agents from “cheating”. J. Econom. Theory (1988) 46:355–372CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maskin E., Riley J. Asymmetric auctions. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2000) 67:413–438CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McLean R. P., Postlewaite A. Efficient auction mechanisms with interdependent valuations and multidimensional signals. (2001) . Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mookherjee D., Reichelstein S. Dominant strategy implementation of Bayesian incentive compatible allocation rules. J. Econom. Theory (1992) 56:378–399CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neeman Z. The effectiveness of English auctions. Games Econom. Behav. (2003) 43:214–238CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parreiras S. O. Correlated information, mechanism design and informational rents. J. Econom. Theory (2005) 123:210–217CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reichelstein S. Investment decisions and managerial performance evaluation. Rev. Accounting Stud. (1997) 2:157–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson R., Bewley T. Game-theoretic analysis of trading processes. Advances in Economic Theory: Fifth World Congress (1987) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 33–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.