Alliance Structure and the Scope of Knowledge Transfer: Evidence from U.S.-Japan Agreements

References

• Ahmadjian C. L., Oxley J. E. Using hostages to support exchange: Dependence balancing and partial equity stakes in Japanese automotive supply relationships. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (2006) 22(1):213–233Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcacer J., Gittelman M. How do I know what you know? Patent examiners and the generation of patent citations. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2006) 88(4):774–779Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen S. A. Caterpillar-Mitsubishi (A). (1991) . Babson College Case Study 392-090-1, Babson College, Wellesley, MAGoogle Scholar
• Almeida P. Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter):155–165Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almeida P., Song J., Grant R. Are firms superior to alliances and markets? An empirical test of cross border knowledge building. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(2):147–161Link, Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan S., Koza M. P. Information asymmetry, adverse selection and joint ventures. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1993) 20:99–117Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bascle G. Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research. Strategic Organ. (2008) 6(3):285–328Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colombo M. G. Alliance form: A test of the contractual and competence perspectives. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(12):1209–1229Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dernis H., Khan M. Triadic patent family methodology. (2004) . OECD STI Working Paper 2004(2), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Science, Technology, and Industry, ParisGoogle Scholar
• Elkjaer B., Easterby-Smith M., Lyles M. A. Social learning theory: Learning as participation in social processes. The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management (2003) (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford) 38–52Google Scholar
• Fabrizio K. University patenting and the pace of industrial innovation. Indust. Corporate Change (2007) 16(4):505–534Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss N. J. More critical comments on the knowledge-based theories of the firm. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(5):519–523Link, Google Scholar
• Geringer J. M., Hebert L. Control and performance of international joint ventures. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1989) 20(2):235–254Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilson R. J., Roe M. J. Understanding the Japanese kieretsu: Overlaps between corporate governance and industrial organization. Yale Law J. (1993) 102:871–906Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gomes-Casseres B. Xerox and Fuji Xerox. (1991) . Harvard Business School Case Study 9-391-156, Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Gomes-Casseres B., Jaffe A. B., Hagedoorn J. Do alliances promote knowledge flows? J. Financial Econom. (2006) 80:5–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B. H., Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M. The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. (2001) . NBER Working Paper 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton B., Nickerson J. A. Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organ. (2003) 1:53–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heiman B., Nickerson J. A. How do firms manage knowledge sharing while avoiding knowledge expropriation in interfirm collaborations? Managerial Decision Econom. (2004) 25:401–420Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe A. B. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms' patents, profits and market value. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76:984–1001Google Scholar
• Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M.Patents, Citations and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M., Fogarty M. S. Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 90(2):215–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janowicz-Panjaitan M., Noorderhaven N. Formal and informal interorganizational learning within strategic alliances. Res. Policy (2008) 37:1337–1355Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B. Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9:319–332Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):283–301Link, Google Scholar
• Lampe R. Strategic citation. (2008) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Lane P. J., Lubatkin M. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(5):461–477Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liebeskind J. P. Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter):93–107Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacGarvie M. Do firms learn from international trade? Rev. Econom. Statist. (2006) 88(1):46–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery D. C., Oxley J. E., Silverman B. S. Strategic alliances and inter-firm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter):77–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery D. C., Oxley J. E., Silverman B. S., Contractor F., Lorange P. The two faces of partner-specific absorptive capacity: Learning and co-specialization in strategic alliances. Cooperative Strategies and Alliances (2002) (Elsevier, London) 291–319Google Scholar
• Murray M. P. Avoiding invalid instruments and coping with weak instruments. J. Econom. Perspectives (2006) 20(4):111–132Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osborn R. N., Baughn C. C. Forms of interorganizational governance for multinational alliances. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33(3):503–519Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oxley J. E. Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: A transaction cost approach. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1997) 13(2):387–409Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oxley J. E., Mahnke V., Pedersen T. Learning versus protection in interfirm alliances: A false dichotomy. Knowledge Flows, Governance and the Multinational Enterprise (2004) (Palgrave Macmillan, New York) 108–129Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oxley J. E., Sampson R. C. The scope and governance of international R&D alliances. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25:723–749Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pisano G. Using equity participation to support exchange: Evidence from the biotechnology industry. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1989) 5(1):109–126Google Scholar
• Reich R. B., Mankin E. D. Joint ventures with Japan give away our future. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1986) 64(2):78–86Google Scholar
• Reuer J., Arino A., Mellewigt T. Entrepreneurial alliances as contractual forms. J. Bus. Venturing (2006) 21(3):306–325Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sampat B., Mowery D. C., Ziedonis A. A. Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: A re-examination. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2003) 21:1371–1390Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santoro M. D., McGill J. P. The effect of uncertainty and asset co-specialization on governance in biotechnology alliances. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26:1261–1269Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver J. M. Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI survival? Management Sci. (1998) 44(4):571–585Link, Google Scholar
• Tallman S. The significance of Bruce Kogut's and Udo Zander's article, ‘Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation'. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2003) 34(6):495–497Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yan A., Gray B. Bargaining power, management control and performance in United States-China joint ventures: A comparative study. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37:1478–1994Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zander U., Kogut B. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(1):76–92Link, Google Scholar