An Optimal Contact Model for Maximizing Online Panel Response Rates

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0969

References

  • Ansari A., Mela C. F. E-customization. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(2):131–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker K. R. An experimental study of the effectiveness of rolling schedules in production planning. Decision Sci. (1977) 8(1):19–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bitran G. R., Mondschein S. V. Mailing decisions in the catalog sales industry. Management Sci. (1996) 42(9):1364–1381LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blattberg R. C., Kim B. D., Neslin S. A.Database Marketing: Analyzing and Managing Customers (2008) (Springer, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carleton J. Panel integrity in the world of online market research. (2006) . White paper, Frost & Sullivan, Palo Alto, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Chand S., Hsu V. N., Sethi S. Forecast, solution and rolling horizons in operations management problems: A classified bibliography. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2002) 4(1):25–43LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davis H. Are you talking to the right people? The importance of online panel quality. (2003) . Quirk's Marketing Research Review (July/August) Article 1134, http://www.quirks.com/Google Scholar
  • Elsner R.Optimiertes Direkt- und Datenbankmarketing unter Einsatz von mehrstufigen dynamischen Modellen (Optimized Direct and Database Marketing Using Multilevel and Dynamic Models) (2002) (Wiesbaden, Gabler, Germany) Google Scholar
  • Elsner R., Krafft M., Huchzermeier A. Optimizing Rhenania's mail-order business through dynamic multilevel modeling (DMLM). Interfaces (2003) 33(1):50–66LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Federal SupplementAlbert v. Warner-Lambert Co. (2002) . 234, F. Suppl. 2d 101Google Scholar
  • Greenfield Greenfield/Ciao online research barometer. (2005) . http://greenfield.com/assets/pdfs/Barometer%2011-05.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Harris Interactive An interview with our panel expert: The top questions about Harris interactive's internet research panel. (2006) . http://www.harrisinteractive.com/partner/pubs/HI_Panel_Overview.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Hogg A. Web efforts energize customer research. Electric Perspectives (2003) 28(5):81–83Google Scholar
  • Lehmann D. R., Gupta S., Steckel J. H.Marketing Research (1998) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • McClain J. O., Thomas L. Horizon effects in aggregate production planning with seasonal demand. Management Sci. (1977) 23(7):728–736LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Neslin S. A., Gupta S., Kamakura W., Lu J., Mason C. Defection detection: Improving predictive accuracy of customer churn models. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(2):204–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simester D., Sun P., Tsitsiklis J. Dynamic catalog mailing policies. Management Sci. (2006) 52(5):683–696LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stenbjerre M., Laugesen J. N. Conducting representative online research: A summary of five years of learnings. (2005) ESOMAR Worldwide Panel Research ConferenceApril 17–19Budapest(ESOMAR, Amsterdam) Google Scholar
  • Sudman S., Wansink B.Consumer Panels (2002) 2nd ed.(American Marketing Association, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Thornton R. Online panels: The new frontier of B2B research. (2005) Ciao GmbH BIG Annual ConferenceMayCiao GmbH, Munich, GermanyGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.