Contagion of Wishful Thinking in Markets

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0973

References

  • Bailey W., Kumar A., Ng D. Foreign investments of U.S. individual investors: Causes and consequences. Management Sci. (2007) 54:443–459LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bar-Hillel M., Budescu D. V. The elusive wishful thinking effect. Thinking Reasoning (1995) 1:71–104CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benartzi S. Excessive extrapolation and the allocation of 401(k) accounts to company stock. J. Finance (2001) 56:1747–1764CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloomfield R. Quotes, prices and estimates in a laboratory market. J. Finance (1996a) 51:1791–1808CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloomfield R. The interdependence of reporting discretion and informational efficiency in laboratory markets. Accounting Rev. (1996b) 71:493–511Google Scholar
  • Bloomfield R., Libby R., Nelson M. W. Communication of confidence as a determinant of group judgment accuracy. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1996) 68:287–300CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloomfield R., O'Hara M., Saar G. How noise trading affects markets: An experimental analysis. Rev. Financial Stud. (2009) . ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradshaw M. T., Bushee B. J., Miller G. S. Accounting choice, home bias, and U.S. investment in non-U.S. firms. J. Accounting Res. (2004) 42:795–841CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Budescu D. V., Bruderman M. The relationship between the illusion of control and the desirability bias. J. Behavioral Decision Making (1995) 8:109–125CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Budescu D. V., Maciejovsky B. The effect of payoff feedback and information pooling on reasoning errors: Evidence from experimental markets. Management Sci. (2005) 51:1829–1843LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C. Do biases in probability judgments matter in markets—Experimental evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1987) 77:981–997Google Scholar
  • Camerer C., Weigelt K. Information mirages in experimental asset markets. J. Bus. (1991) 64:463–493CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coval J. D., Moskowitz T. J. The geography of investment: Informed trading and asset prices. J. Political Econom. (2001) 109:811–841CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dansereu F., Alluto J. A., Yammarino F. J.Theory Testing in Organizational Behavior: The Variant Approach (1984) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Ditto P. H., Lopez D. F. Motivated skepticism: The use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1992) 63:568–584CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmans A., Garcia D., Norli O. Sports sentiment and stock returns. J. Finance (2007) 62:1967–1998CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forsythe R., Lundholm R. J. Information aggregation in an experimental market. Econometrica (1990) 58:309–347CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forsythe R., Nelson F., Neumann G. R., Wright J. Anatomy of an experimental political stock market. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1992) 82:1142–1161Google Scholar
  • Gollier C., Pratt J. W. Risk vulnerability and the tempering effect of background risk. Econometrica (1996) 64:1109–1123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hahn R. W., Tetlock P. C.Information Markets: A New Way of Making Decisions (2006) (AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
  • Hales J. Directional preferences, information processing, and investors' forecasts of earnings. J. Accounting Res. (2007) 45:607–628CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hales J. Are investors really willing to agree to disagree? An experimental investigation of how disagreement and attention to disagreement affect trading behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2009) . ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hau H. Location matters: An examination of trading profits. J. Finance (2001) 56:1959–1983CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Irwin F. W. States expectations as functions of probability and desirability of outcomes. J. Personality (1953) 21:329–335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Irwin F. W., Snodgrass J. G. Effects of independent and dependent outcome values upon bets. J. Experiment. Psych. (1966) 71:282–285CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kimball M. Standard risk aversion. Econometrica (1993) 61:589–611CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krizan Z., Windschitl P. D. The influence of outcome desirability on optimism. Psych. Bull. (2007) 133:95–121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kunda Z. The case for motivated reasoning. Psych. Bull. (1990) 108:480–498CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ledyard J. O., Hahn R., Tetlock P. Designing information markets for policy analysis. Information Markets: A New Way of Making Decisions (2006) (AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
  • Lintner J. The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1965) 47:13–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lundholm R. J. What affects the efficiency of a market? Some answers from the laboratory. Accounting Rev. (1991) 66:486–515Google Scholar
  • O'Hara M.Market Microstructure Theory (2004) (Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Oliven K., Rietz T. A. Suckers are born but markets are made: Individual rationality, arbitrage, and market efficiency on an electronic futures market. Management Sci. (2004) 50:336–351LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Plott C. R., Sunder S. Efficiency of experimental security markets with insider information: An application of rational-expectations models. J. Political Econom. (1982) 90:663–698CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Plott C. R., Sunder S. Rational expectations and the aggregation of diverse information in laboratory security markets. Econometrica (1988) 56:1085–1118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Russ R. Prediction markets and the financial “wisdom of crowds”. J. Behavioral Finance (2006) 7:2–4CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schnitzlein C. R. Call and continuous trading mechanisms under asymmetric information: An experimental investigation. J. Finance (1996) 51:613–636CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sharpe W. F. Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J. Finance (1964) 19:425–442Google Scholar
  • Slovic P. Value as a determiner of subjective probability. IEEE Trans. Human Factors Electronics (1966) HFE7:22–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strong N., Xu X. Understanding the equity home bias: Evidence from survey data. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2003) 84:307–312CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sunder S., Roth A., Kagel J. Experimental asset markets: A survey. The Handbook of Experimental Economics (1995) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 445–500Google Scholar
  • Wolfers J., Zitzewitz E. Prediction markets. J. Econom. Perspect. (2004) 18:107–126CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.